Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 2003
The acute myotoxic effects of bupivacaine and ropivacaine after continuous peripheral nerve blockades.
Bupivacaine causes muscle damage. However, the myotoxic potency of ropivacaine is still unexplored. Therefore, we performed this study to compare the effects of bupivacaine and ropivacaine on skeletal muscle tissue in equipotent concentrations. Femoral nerve catheters were inserted into anesthetized minipigs, and 20 mL of either bupivacaine (5 mg/mL) or ropivacaine (7.5 mg/mL) was injected. Subsequently, bupivacaine (2.5 mg/mL) and ropivacaine (3.75 mg/mL) were continuously infused over 6 h. Control animals were treated with corresponding volumes of normal saline. Finally, muscle samples were dissected at injection sites. After processing and staining, histological patterns of muscle damage were blindly examined, scored (0 = no damage to 3 = myonecrosis), and statistically analyzed. After normal saline, only interstitial edema was found. Bupivacaine treatment caused severe tissue damage (score, 2.3 +/- 0.7), whereas ropivacaine induced fiber injury of a significantly smaller extent (score, 1.3 +/- 0.8). Furthermore, bupivacaine, but not ropivacaine, induced apoptosis in muscle fibers. In summary, both drugs induce muscle damage with similar histological patterns. Compared with bupivacaine, which induces both necrosis and apoptosis, the tissue damage caused by ropivacaine is significantly less severe. We conclude that ropivacaine's myotoxic potential is more moderate in comparison with that of bupivacaine. ⋯ After continuous peripheral nerve blockades, the long-acting local anesthetics bupivacaine and ropivacaine both induce fiber necrosis in porcine skeletal muscle tissue. In comparison with ropivacaine, bupivacaine causes tissue damage of a significantly larger extent and additionally induces apoptosis in skeletal muscle cells.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 2003
Comment Letter Comparative StudyClinical manifestations of latex anaphylaxis during anesthesia differ from those not anesthesia/surgery-related.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 2003
Can determining the minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration of volatile anesthetic be used as an objective tool to assess antinociception in animals?
We intended to evaluate the reliability of the minimum anesthetic alveolar concentration (MAC)-sparing effect as an objective measure of the antinociceptive properties of a drug. For this purpose, we tested different variables and analyzed the significance of the results obtained. In a first set of experiments, we studied rats under mechanical ventilation and sevoflurane anesthesia. Outcome variables such as gross purposeful movements consecutive to tail clamping, paw withdrawal consecutive to increasing pressure, and cardio-circulatory reactivity (MACBAR) after these stimuli were recorded. In a second set of experiment, sevoflurane-anesthetized rats under spontaneous breathing conditions were used. Thermal stimuli were compared with pressure. The MAC-sparing effect of several doses of sufentanil and clonidine was evaluated in both anesthetized and awake rodents. When considering the stimulus applied, larger concentrations of sevoflurane were required to suppress reactivity after tail clamp than after paw pressure or radiant heat (1.81 +/- 0.28 versus 1.45 +/- 0.22 and 1.53 +/- 0.26; P < 0.05). For the two first stimuli, no significant differences were noted between the concentrations that suppress motor or cardio-circulatory reactions. All doses of sufentanil tested significantly reduced (P < 0.05) the different MAC values except the smallest one (0.005 micro g x kg(-1) x min(-1)) that significantly increased MACBAR in ventilated animals and both MAC and MACBAR in spontaneously breathing rodents (P < 0.05). Clonidine, at its optimal dose (10 micro g/kg), significantly reduced both MAC and MACBAR to the same degree. In awake animals submitted to radiant heat or pressure challenge, none of the clonidine doses nor sufentanil doses (0.005 and 0.07) were active. In conclusion, the MAC-sparing effect provides several reliable and quantifiable variables that allow comparison between different analgesic substances. However, the observations made are not simply the result of antinociceptive effects of the tested drugs but rather that of complex interactions between these drugs and a halogenated vapor. ⋯ The MAC-sparing effect provides several variables that allow comparison between different analgesic substances. However, the observations made are not simply the result of the antinociceptive effects of the tested drugs but rather the result of complex interactions between these drugs and a halogenated vapor.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 2003
Review Meta AnalysisInhaled nitric oxide for acute hypoxic respiratory failure in children and adults: a meta-analysis.
We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials examining inhaled nitric oxide (INO) for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome or acute lung injury in children and adults. Qualitative assessments of identified trials were made, and metaanalyses were performed according to Cochrane methodology. Five randomized controlled trials (n = 535) met entry criteria. ⋯ Other clinical indicators of effectiveness, such as duration of hospital and intensive care stay, were inconsistently reported. Lack of data prevented assessment of all outcomes. If further trials assessing INO in acute respiratory distress syndrome or acute lung injury are to proceed, they should be stratified for primary etiology, incorporate other modalities that may affect outcome, and evaluate clinically relevant outcomes before any benefit of INO can be excluded.