Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2003
Clinical TrialAn intervention study to enhance postoperative pain management.
This study, conducted before and after the implementation of an acute pain service (APS) in a 1000-bed hospital, describes the process of the implementation of an APS. The nursing, anesthesia, and surgery departments were involved. In this study we sought to evaluate the results of a continuous quality improvement program by defining quality indicators and using quality tools. A quality program in accordance with current standards of acute pain treatment (multimodal) was worked out to enhance pain relief for all surgical inpatients. A survey of nurses' knowledge with regard to postoperative pain was conducted, and a visual analog scale (VAS) was introduced to assess pain intensity. Both nurses and physicians became familiar with evidence-based guidelines concerning postoperative pain. The entire process was monitored in three consecutive surveys and enrolled 2383 surgical inpatients. Pain indicators based on VAS and analgesic consumption were recorded during the first 72 postoperative hours. After a baseline survey about current practices of pain treatment, a nurse-based, anesthesiologist-supervised APS was implemented. The improvement in pain relief, expressed as VAS scores, was assessed in two further surveys. A quality manual was written and implemented. A major improvement in pain scores was observed after the APS inception (P < 0.001). ⋯ The implementation of an acute pain service, including pain assessment by a visual analog scale, standard multimodal pain treatment, and continuous quality evaluation, improved postoperative pain relief. Establishing teams of surgeons, anesthesiologists, and nurses is the prerequisite for this improvement.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2003
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialLidocaine sprayed down the endotracheal tube attenuates the airway-circulatory reflexes by local anesthesia during emergence and extubation.
To determine whether lidocaine sprayed down the endotracheal tube (ETT) would attenuate airway-circulatory reflexes during emergence, we compared the reflex responses after endotracheal or IV lidocaine (IVL) in 75 patients receiving a standardized anesthetic protocol. At the end of surgery, the patients were divided into 3 groups (n = 25 for each group) and given no drug (Group 1), given 1 mg/kg of 2% lidocaine sprayed down the ETT 5 min before (Group 2), or given the same dose of IVL 3 min before extubation (Group 3). Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at predetermined time points from 5 min (baseline) before until 5 min after extubation. The number of coughs per patient was continuously monitored during this period. The number (mean +/- SD) of coughs was decreased in Group 2 (4.5 +/- 3.7) compared with the control (10.2 +/- 6.0) (P < 0.01) with no difference for the control versus Group 3 (7.8 +/- 4.6). The increase in blood pressure was only attenuated immediately before extubation (P < 0.05), whereas the increase in heart rate was attenuated (P < 0.05) at all (except baseline) time points (P < 0.05) in Group 2 compared with the control with no difference for the control versus Group 3. The results indicate that lidocaine sprayed down the ETT suppresses the reflexes whereas using the same dose IVL does not, which is probably attributable to the mucosa-anesthetizing effect of lidocaine. ⋯ Lidocaine sprayed down the endotracheal tube suppresses the airway-circulatory reflex responses whereas using the same dose IV lidocaine does not. This effect seems to be from the direct local anesthesia rather than from systemic absorption from the airway.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2003
Clinical TrialThe predictive value of modified computerized thromboelastography and platelet function analysis for postoperative blood loss in routine cardiac surgery.
Hemorrhage after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) remains a clinical problem. Point-of-care tests to identify hemostatic disturbances at the bedside are desirable. In the present study, we evaluated the predictive value of two point-of-care tests on postoperative bleeding after routine cardiac surgery. Prospectively, 255 consecutive patients were studied to compare the ability of modified thromboelastography (ROTEG) as well as a platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) to predict postoperative blood loss. Measurements were performed at three time points: preoperatively, during CPB, and after protamine administration with three modified thromboelastography and PFA tests. The best predictors of increased bleeding tendency were the tests performed after CPB. The angle alpha is the best predictor (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.69) and, in combination with the adenosine diphosphate-PFA test, the predictive accuracy is enhanced (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.73). The negative predictive value for the angle alpha is 82%, although the positive predictive value is small (41%). Thromboelastography is a better predictor than PFA. In routine cardiac surgery, impaired hemostasis as identified by point-of-care tests does not inevitably lead to hemorrhage postoperatively. However, patients with normal test results are unlikely to bleed for hemostatic reasons. Bleeding in these patients is probably caused surgically. The high negative predictive value supports early identification and targeted treatment of surgical bleeding by distinguishing it from a significant coagulopathy. ⋯ Thrombelastography and platelet function analysis in routine cardiac surgery demonstrate high negative predictive values for postoperative bleeding, which supports early identification and targeted treatment of surgical bleeding by distinguishing it from a significant coagulopathy. The positive predictive values are small. The best predictors are thrombelastography values obtained after cardiopulmonary bypass.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2003
Extending the skeletal muscle viability period in the malignant hyperthermia test.
The caffeine halothane contracture test (CHCT) is the only validated test for diagnosing malignant hyperthermia (MH) susceptibility (MHS) and phenotyping MHS families. Although most diagnostic laboratory tests can check intra- and interlaboratory consistency through the use of standard control samples, there has been no practical way to achieve this goal for the CHCT. The distances between diagnostic centers and time constraints of the CHCT protocol (5 h) prohibit centers from sharing tissue samples. In this study, we investigated varying storage conditions to extend the standard viability period of skeletal muscle to 24 h. Twenty MHS patients were tested according to the North America protocol. After standard CHCT, the surplus muscle samples were placed in one of the following four treatment groups. In Groups 1 and 2, muscles remained under tension and were stored in Krebs buffer (pH 7.4) at 23 degrees C-25 degrees C (clamped-warm) and 4 degrees C (clamped-cold), respectively. In Groups 3 and 4, muscle strips were dissected, and the ends were tied with silk sutures, cut from the clamp, and placed in Krebs buffer at 23 degrees C-25 degrees C (free-warm) and 4 degrees C (free-cold), respectively. The responses of the treatment groups to halothane (3%) and caffeine (0.5-32 mM) were tested at 22-26 h after excision. The clamped-warm storage group correctly diagnosed MHS in all patients. ⋯ Varying conditions for storage of muscle were investigated to extend the viability period of muscle in the malignant hyperthermia (MH) test from 5 to 24 h. Muscles stored for 24 h under tension at room temperature remained viable and correctly diagnosed MH susceptibility in all patients.