Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2003
The diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea as a risk factor for unanticipated admissions in outpatient surgery.
The goal of this study was to determine whether the preoperative diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent risk factor for perioperative complications in patients undergoing nonotorhinolaryngologic outpatient surgical procedures. We used existing databases to identify 234 patients with polysomnography-confirmed OSA who had outpatient surgical procedures in the years 1997 through 2000. Control patients were matched for type of anesthesia, age, sex, body mass index, surgical procedure, and surgical date. Their perioperative medical records were reviewed. There was no significant difference in the intraoperative management of OSA and control patients, except that the laryngeal mask airway was less likely to be used in OSA patients. There was no significant difference in the rate of unplanned hospital admissions (23.9% versus 18.8%; odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.5) or other adverse events (2.1% versus 1.3%; odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-7.0) between OSA and non-OSA patients. Further, when admission did occur, it was generally unrelated to cardiac or respiratory events. In this retrospective analysis, the preoperative diagnosis of OSA was not a risk factor for either unanticipated hospital admission or for other adverse events among patients undergoing outpatient surgical procedures in a tertiary referral center. ⋯ In patients scheduled for outpatient surgery in a large academic practice, the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea confirmed by polysomnography was not an independent risk factor for unanticipated hospital admission or for other adverse perioperative events.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe influence of local active warming on pain relief of patients with cholelithiasis during rescue transport.
Upper abdominal pain, a frequent symptom of the presence of gallstone disease, is the cause of 6% of the emergency calls of the Austrian emergency system. Pain resulting from cholelithiasis is characteristically severe. Recent data show that active warming during emergency transport of trauma victims is effective in reducing pain. Therefore, we hypothesized that local active warming of the abdomen would be an effective pain treatment for patients with acute cholelithiasis and could be provided by paramedics. Sixty patients (>19 yr) consented to participate in this study. They were divided into two groups: Group 1, who received active warming of the upper abdomen with a carbon-fiber warming blanket (42 degrees C), and Group 2, who received no warming of the abdomen. Neither group received any drug-based pain care. Patients were asked to rate their pain and anxiety by using visual analog scales (VAS). Statistical evaluation was performed with Student's t-test; P < 0.05 was considered significant. In Group 1, a significant (P < 0.01) pain reduction was recorded in all cases on a visual analog scale (VAS), from 86.8 +/- 5.5 mm to 41.2 +/- 16.2 mm. In Group 2, the patients' pain scores remained comparable, from 88.3 +/- 9.9 mm to 88.1 +/- 10.0 mm on a VAS. In comparing Group 1 with Group 2 on arrival at the hospital, pain scores showed a significant difference (P < 0.01). In Group 1, the VAS score changes for anxiety were significantly reduced (P < 0.01), from 82.7 +/- 10.8 mm before treatment to 39.0 +/- 14.0 mm after treatment. In Group 2, a nonsignificant change of this score was noted, from 84.5 +/- 14.6 mm to 83.5 +/- 8.4 mm. Comparing Group 1 with Group 2 on arrival at the hospital showed a significant difference in anxiety scores (P < 0.01). We conclude that local active warming is an effective and easy-to-learn treatment for pain resulting from acute cholelithiasis in emergency care. ⋯ Active local warming of the upper abdomen is an effective treatment for patients with cholelithiasis being transported to the hospital by paramedics who are not permitted to provide any drug-based pain care. We observed no negative side effects of this treatment.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialIntravenous lidocaine as adjuvant to sevoflurane anesthesia for endotracheal intubation in children.
Supplementing a sevoflurane induction of anesthesia in children with IV lidocaine 2 mg/kg can suppress cough after tracheal intubation and thus improve intubating conditions. In addition, lidocaine minimizes blood pressure fluctuations after tracheal intubation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialRemifentanil with thiopental for tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants.
Tracheal intubation may be accomplished with remifentanil and a non-opioid IV anesthetic without a muscle relaxant. In this study, we evaluated in double-blinded, prospective, randomized manner the dose requirements for remifentanil with thiopental without muscle relaxant administration to obtain clinically acceptable intubation conditions and cardiovascular responses. After premedication with midazolam 0.03 mg/kg IV, 105 patients were randomized equally to one of three study groups, each receiving the following: remifentanil 2 micro g/kg (Group I), 3 micro g/kg (Group II), and 4 micro g/kg (Group III). Remifentanil was administered over 30 s, and anesthesia was induced with thiopental 5 mg/kg. Tracheal intubation conditions were assessed by the anesthesiologist performing the intubation as: (a) excellent, (b) satisfactory, (c) fair, and (d) unsatisfactory. There were no statistically significant differences among groups regarding to demographic data. Blood pressure and heart rate did not increase in any group after accomplishing intubation. There was a significant improvement in intubation conditions between Groups I and II, I and III, and II and III (P < 0.001). We conclude that remifentanil 4 micro g/kg administered before thiopental 5 mg/kg provided excellent or satisfactory intubation conditions in 94% of patients and prevented cardiovascular responses to intubation. ⋯ We evaluated in a double-blinded manner the dose requirements for remifentanil with thiopental without muscle relaxants for obtaining acceptable intubation condition. Our results show that remifentanil 4 micro g/kg administered before thiopental provided excellent or satisfactory intubation condition in 94% of patients.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2003
Meta AnalysisEpidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for labor: a meta-analysis.
Numerous studies have compared ropivacaine with bupivacaine for labor analgesia. Early studies suggested that obstetrical and some neonatal outcomes were improved when ropivacaine was used. We systematically reviewed and combined the results of the randomized controlled trials that compared ropivacaine with bupivacaine to determine whether or not there was a difference in these outcomes. We searched electronic databases and journals for randomized controlled trials composed of laboring parturients. The primary outcome was the incidence of spontaneous vaginal delivery. We examined other obstetrical, neonatal, and analgesic outcomes. Where possible, these were combined by using metaanalytic techniques and random effects modeling. We found 23 randomized controlled trials composed of 1043 patients receiving ropivacaine and 1031 receiving bupivacaine. There was no significant difference in the incidence of spontaneous vaginal delivery (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.41; P = 0.12) or any of the other outcomes. Although more studies reported a more frequent incidence of motor block with bupivacaine, the results were heterogeneous and therefore not combined. We conclude that there is no statistically significant difference between the two drugs in the incidence of any obstetrical or neonatal outcome. Further studies using clinically appropriate concentrations of drugs are required to determine whether or not there is a difference in the incidence of motor block. ⋯ This metaanalysis of 23 randomized controlled trials shows that both ropivacaine and bupivacaine provide excellent labor analgesia. There was no significant difference between the two drugs in mode of delivery, maternal satisfaction, or neonatal outcomes. Whether or not there is a difference in motor block at clinically relevant doses is unresolved.