Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2003
Meta AnalysisEpidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for labor: a meta-analysis.
Numerous studies have compared ropivacaine with bupivacaine for labor analgesia. Early studies suggested that obstetrical and some neonatal outcomes were improved when ropivacaine was used. We systematically reviewed and combined the results of the randomized controlled trials that compared ropivacaine with bupivacaine to determine whether or not there was a difference in these outcomes. We searched electronic databases and journals for randomized controlled trials composed of laboring parturients. The primary outcome was the incidence of spontaneous vaginal delivery. We examined other obstetrical, neonatal, and analgesic outcomes. Where possible, these were combined by using metaanalytic techniques and random effects modeling. We found 23 randomized controlled trials composed of 1043 patients receiving ropivacaine and 1031 receiving bupivacaine. There was no significant difference in the incidence of spontaneous vaginal delivery (odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.41; P = 0.12) or any of the other outcomes. Although more studies reported a more frequent incidence of motor block with bupivacaine, the results were heterogeneous and therefore not combined. We conclude that there is no statistically significant difference between the two drugs in the incidence of any obstetrical or neonatal outcome. Further studies using clinically appropriate concentrations of drugs are required to determine whether or not there is a difference in the incidence of motor block. ⋯ This metaanalysis of 23 randomized controlled trials shows that both ropivacaine and bupivacaine provide excellent labor analgesia. There was no significant difference between the two drugs in mode of delivery, maternal satisfaction, or neonatal outcomes. Whether or not there is a difference in motor block at clinically relevant doses is unresolved.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialClonidine combined with small-dose bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia for inguinal herniorrhaphy: a randomized double-blinded study.
The aim of this randomized double-blinded study was to see whether the addition of small-dose clonidine to small-dose bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia prolonged the duration of postoperative analgesia and also provided a sufficient block duration that would be adequate for inguinal herniorrhaphy. We randomized 45 patients to 3 groups receiving intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 6 mg combined with saline (Group B), clonidine 15 micro g (Group BC15), or clonidine 30 micro g (Group BC30); all solutions were diluted with saline to 3 mL. The sensory block level was insufficient for surgery in five patients in Group B, and these patients were given general anesthesia. Patients in Groups BC15 and BC30 had a significantly higher spread of analgesia (two to four dermatomes) than those in Group B. Two-segment regression, return of S1 sensation, and regression of motor block were significantly longer in Group BC30 than in Group B. The addition of clonidine 15 and 30 micro g to bupivacaine prolonged time to first analgesic request and decreased postoperative pain with minimal risk of hypotension. We conclude that clonidine 15 micro g with bupivacaine 6 mg produced an effective spinal anesthesia and recommend this dose for inguinal herniorrhaphy, because it did not prolong the motor block. ⋯ The addition of clonidine 15 micro g to 6 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine increases the spread of analgesia, prolongs the time to first analgesic request, and decreases postoperative pain, compared with bupivacaine alone, during inguinal herniorrhaphy under spinal anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2003
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialChanges in respiratory mechanics during cardiac surgery.
We investigated the role of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in compromised lung function associated with cardiac surgery. Low-frequency respiratory impedance (Zrs) was measured in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with (n = 30; CPB group) or without (n = 29; off-pump coronary artery bypass [OPCAB] group) CPB. Another group of CPB patients received dopamine (DA) (n = 12; CPB-DA group). Extravascular lung water was determined in five CPB subjects. Zrs was measured before skin incision and after chest closure. Airway resistance and inertance and tissue damping and elastance were determined from Zrs data. Airway resistance increased in the CPB group (74.9% +/- 20.8%; P < 0.05), whereas it did not change in the OPCAB group (11.8% +/- 7.9%; not significant) and even decreased in the CPB-DA patients (-40.6% +/- 9.2%; P < 0.05). Tissue damping increased in the CPB and OPCAB groups, whereas it remained constant in the CPB-DA patients. Significant increases in elastance were observed in all groups. There was no difference in extravascular lung water before and after CPB, suggesting that edema did not develop. These results indicate a significant and heterogeneous airway narrowing during CPB, which was counteracted by the administration of DA. The mild deterioration in tissue mechanics, reflecting partial closure of the airways, may be a consequence of the anesthesia itself. ⋯ We observed that cardiopulmonary bypass deteriorates lung function by inducing a heterogeneous airway constriction, whereas no such effects were observed in patients undergoing cardiac surgery without bypass. The impairment in parenchymal mechanics, which was obtained in both groups, may result from peripheral airway closure and/or be a consequence of mediator release.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2003
Case ReportsGuiding surgical cannulation of the inferior vena cava with transesophageal echocardiography.
We studied 150 adult cardiac surgery patients to assess visualization of the venous cannula and the venous system by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography and to register the incidence of cannulation of hepatic veins. The quality of images, the dimensions of the venous system, the position of the venous cannula, and the adequacy of venous return were registered. Acceptable image quality of the inferior vena cava and the right hepatic vein (RHV) was obtained in 95% and 87% of cases, respectively. Considerable individual variations were found in the dimensions of the venous system. The cannula position could be determined in 99% of the cases. Ten percent of venous cannulae were primarily placed in the RHV. A short distance between the eustachian valve and the RHV possibly predisposes to cannulation of the RHV. No other patient-related factors were associated with cannula position. Placement of the cannula deep in the inferior vena cava was associated with reduced venous return and may be a more important cause of reduced return than a cannula positioned in a hepatic vein. ⋯ Correct positioning of the venous cannula draining blood to the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit is important. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography allows satisfactory determination of the cannula position in nearly all patients. Ten percent of venous cannulae are primarily positioned in the right hepatic vein and not in the inferior vena cava as intended.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2003
The diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea as a risk factor for unanticipated admissions in outpatient surgery.
The goal of this study was to determine whether the preoperative diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent risk factor for perioperative complications in patients undergoing nonotorhinolaryngologic outpatient surgical procedures. We used existing databases to identify 234 patients with polysomnography-confirmed OSA who had outpatient surgical procedures in the years 1997 through 2000. Control patients were matched for type of anesthesia, age, sex, body mass index, surgical procedure, and surgical date. Their perioperative medical records were reviewed. There was no significant difference in the intraoperative management of OSA and control patients, except that the laryngeal mask airway was less likely to be used in OSA patients. There was no significant difference in the rate of unplanned hospital admissions (23.9% versus 18.8%; odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-2.5) or other adverse events (2.1% versus 1.3%; odds ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-7.0) between OSA and non-OSA patients. Further, when admission did occur, it was generally unrelated to cardiac or respiratory events. In this retrospective analysis, the preoperative diagnosis of OSA was not a risk factor for either unanticipated hospital admission or for other adverse events among patients undergoing outpatient surgical procedures in a tertiary referral center. ⋯ In patients scheduled for outpatient surgery in a large academic practice, the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea confirmed by polysomnography was not an independent risk factor for unanticipated hospital admission or for other adverse perioperative events.