Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2003
Lidocaine attenuates cytokine-induced cell injury in endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells.
Local anesthetics have been reported to attenuate the inflammatory response and ischemia/reperfusion injury. Therefore, we hypothesized that pretreatment with local anesthetics may protect endothelial and vascular smooth muscle (VSM) cells from cytokine-induced injury. Human microvascular endothelial cells and rat VSM cells were pretreated with lidocaine or tetracaine (5-100 microM for 30 min) and then exposed to the cytokines tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interferon-gamma, and interleukin-1beta for 72 h. Cell survival and integrity were evaluated by trypan blue exclusion and lactate dehydrogenase release. The role of adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels, protein kinase C, or both in modulating local anesthetic-induced protection was evaluated with the mitochondrial KATP antagonist 5-hydroxydecanoate, the cell-surface KATP antagonist 1-[5-[2-(5-chloro-o-anisamido)ethyl]-2-methoxyphenyl]sulfonyl-3-methylthiourea (HMR-1098), and the protein kinase C inhibitor staurosporine. Lidocaine attenuated cytokine-induced cell injury in a dose-dependent manner. Lidocaine (5 microM) increased cell survival by approximately 10%, whereas lidocaine (100 microM) increased cell survival by approximately 60% and induced a threefold decrease in lactate dehydrogenase release in both cell types. In contrast, tetracaine did not attenuate cytokine-induced cell injury. 5-hydroxydecanoate abolished the protective effects of lidocaine, but staurosporine and HMR-1098 had no effect on the lidocaine-induced protection. This study showed that lidocaine, but not tetracaine, attenuates cytokine-induced injury in endothelial and VSM cells. Lidocaine-induced protection appears to be modulated by mitochondrial KATP channels. ⋯ This study demonstrates that lidocaine attenuates cytokine-induced injury of endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells via mechanisms involving adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels. Protection of the vasculature from cytokine-induced inflammation may preserve important physiological endothelial and vascular smooth muscle functions.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2003
The effects of pyrilamine and cimetidine on mRNA C-fos expression and nociceptive flinching behavior in rats.
C-fos and Fos expression, frequently used as a neural nociceptive marker, is altered by many drugs. The effects of histamine receptor antagonists on c-fos messenger (m)RNA expression are unknown. We examined the effect of local and systemic administration of pyrilamine (H(1) receptor antagonist) and cimetidine (H(2) receptor antagonist) on the nociceptive flinching behavior elicited by injection of 50 micro L of 1% formalin into the dorsal region of the hind paw of rats. Nociceptive flinching behavior was observed for 45 min, and the rats were then killed and lumbar spinal cord obtained for c-fos mRNA expression, measured using the Northern blot hybridization technique. Systemic administration of pyrilamine and cimetidine did not elicit response in nociceptive behavior or in c-fos mRNA expression. When the drugs were locally administered, they affected behavior and c-fos mRNA expression in different patterns. Pyrilamine decreased the number of flinches in a dose dependent manner in both phases, whereas cimetidine did not affect Phase I and decreased the number of flinches in Phase II, but only partially. Pyrilamine 5 and 20 mM decreased c-fos mRNA expression, and cimetidine decreased the expression only at 100 mM. The systemic use of the drugs had no effect on c-fos mRNA expression. ⋯ Histamine receptor antagonists present antinociceptive effects when administered peripherally. These effects are observed through a nociceptive flinching behavior test and mRNA c-fos expression. Pyrilamine (H(1) receptor antagonist) has a greater antinociceptive effect than cimetidine (H(2) receptor antagonist).
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEphedrine fails to accelerate the onset of neuromuscular block by vecuronium.
The onset time of neuromuscular blocking drugs is partially determined by circulatory factors, including muscle blood flow and cardiac output. We thus tested the hypothesis that a bolus of ephedrine accelerates the onset of vecuronium neuromuscular block by increasing cardiac output. A prospective, randomized study was conducted in 53 patients scheduled for elective surgery. After the induction of anesthesia, the ulnar nerve was stimulated supramaximally every 10 s, and the evoked twitch response of the adductor pollicis was recorded with accelerometry. Patients were maintained under anesthesia with continuous infusion of propofol for 10 min and then randomly assigned to ephedrine 210 microg/kg (n = 27) or an equivalent volume of saline (n = 26). The test solution was given 1 min before the administration of 0.1 mg/kg of vecuronium. Cardiac output was monitored with impedance cardiography. Ephedrine, but not saline, increased cardiac index (17%; P = 0.003). Nonetheless, the onset of 90% neuromuscular block was virtually identical in the patients given ephedrine (183 +/- 41 s) and saline (181 +/- 47 s). There was no correlation between cardiac index and onset of the blockade. We conclude that the onset of the vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block is primarily determined by factors other than cardiac output. The combination of ephedrine and vecuronium thus cannot be substituted for rapid-acting nondepolarizing muscle relaxants. ⋯ Ephedrine increased cardiac index but failed to speed onset of neuromuscular block with vecuronium. We conclude that ephedrine administration does not shorten the onset time of vecuronium.