Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of the costs and efficacy of ondansetron and dolasetron in the prophylaxis of postoperative vomiting in pediatric patients undergoing ambulatory surgery.
Postoperative vomiting (POV) after ambulatory surgery remains a major problem. We designed this study to determine the smallest dose of dolasetron equivalent to the Food and Drug Administration approved dose of ondansetron 100 micro g/kg IV, for the prophylaxis of POV in children undergoing surgery. In this double-blinded controlled study, 204 healthy ASA I-II children aged 2-12 yr, undergoing superficial ambulatory (day-case) surgery, were randomized to receive either ondansetron 100 micro g/kg IV, or dolasetron 45, 175, 350, or 700 micro g/kg IV during a standardized perioperative regimen. The primary end-point was the incidence of complete response, defined as the absence of POV symptoms. Costs were calculated from the perspective of the hospital using a previously described model. The incidence of early (0-6 h) and 24-h emesis was more frequent in the dolasetron 45 micro g/kg group compared with the dolasetron 350 and 700 micro g/kg groups and with the ondansetron group. Repeated POV occurred more often when dolasetron was used in a dose <350 micro g/kg. There were no significant differences in emesis rates between the dolasetron 175, 350, and 700 micro g/kg groups or between these groups and the ondansetron 100 micro g/kg group. The smallest dose of dolasetron with acceptable equivalent efficacy and patient satisfaction scores to ondansetron 100 micro g/kg was 350 micro g/kg. Institutional costs for managing POV were less with dolasetron 350 micro g/kg than with ondansetron. ⋯ This randomized double-blinded dose-ranging study concluded that dolasetron, 350 micro g/kg IV, was the smallest dose that provided acceptable equivalent efficacy and patient satisfaction scores to ondansetron, 100 micro g/kg IV, for the prophylaxis of postoperative vomiting in children undergoing outpatient surgery. However, with this dose, the costs to the institution for managing postoperative vomiting were less.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 2003
The effects of pyrilamine and cimetidine on mRNA C-fos expression and nociceptive flinching behavior in rats.
C-fos and Fos expression, frequently used as a neural nociceptive marker, is altered by many drugs. The effects of histamine receptor antagonists on c-fos messenger (m)RNA expression are unknown. We examined the effect of local and systemic administration of pyrilamine (H(1) receptor antagonist) and cimetidine (H(2) receptor antagonist) on the nociceptive flinching behavior elicited by injection of 50 micro L of 1% formalin into the dorsal region of the hind paw of rats. Nociceptive flinching behavior was observed for 45 min, and the rats were then killed and lumbar spinal cord obtained for c-fos mRNA expression, measured using the Northern blot hybridization technique. Systemic administration of pyrilamine and cimetidine did not elicit response in nociceptive behavior or in c-fos mRNA expression. When the drugs were locally administered, they affected behavior and c-fos mRNA expression in different patterns. Pyrilamine decreased the number of flinches in a dose dependent manner in both phases, whereas cimetidine did not affect Phase I and decreased the number of flinches in Phase II, but only partially. Pyrilamine 5 and 20 mM decreased c-fos mRNA expression, and cimetidine decreased the expression only at 100 mM. The systemic use of the drugs had no effect on c-fos mRNA expression. ⋯ Histamine receptor antagonists present antinociceptive effects when administered peripherally. These effects are observed through a nociceptive flinching behavior test and mRNA c-fos expression. Pyrilamine (H(1) receptor antagonist) has a greater antinociceptive effect than cimetidine (H(2) receptor antagonist).