Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2004
Clinical TrialA secure method of nasotracheal tube fixation using an infant feeding tube.
A well secured endotracheal tube is very essential for the safe conduct of anesthesia. In maxillofacial surgeries, providing secure fixation of the nasotracheal tube has always been a problem. We have used an infant feeding tube that goes around the nasal septum for the fixation of the nasal endotracheal tube. This method of securing the nasotracheal tube does not hinder the surgical access, is well tolerated by patients, and is safe.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialA multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing patient-controlled epidural with intravenous analgesia for pain relief in labor.
In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, we sought to determine whether patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for labor affected the incidence of cesarean delivery when compared with patient-controlled IV opioid analgesia (PCIA). Healthy, term nulliparous patients in 4 Canadian institutions were randomly assigned to receive PCIA with fentanyl (n = 118) or PCEA with 0.08% bupivacaine and fentanyl 1.6 microg/mL (n = 124). There was no difference in the incidence of cesarean delivery-10.2% (12 of 118) versus 9.7% (12 of 124)-or instrumental vaginal delivery-21.2% (25 of 118) versus 29% (36 of 124)-between groups. ⋯ More neonates in the PCIA group required active resuscitation (52% versus 31%; P = 0.001) and naloxone (17% versus 3%; P < 0.001). These observations support the hypothesis that PCEA does not result in an increased incidence of obstetrical intervention compared with PCIA. PCEA provides superior analgesia and less maternal and neonatal sedation compared with PCIA.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialIntraoperative wake-up test and postoperative emergence in patients undergoing spinal surgery: a comparison of intravenous and inhaled anesthetic techniques using short-acting anesthetics.
Surgical procedures on the vertebral column may result in spinal cord damage, leading to neurological deficits that demand immediate therapeutical intervention. We designed this study to determine which anesthetic regimen allows a rapid wake-up test during and after surgery to detect neurological deficits. ⋯ Group PS required significantly longer times for the onset of breathing (8.9 +/- 1.6 min), elevation of the head (17.0 +/- 3.8 min), and motion of the feet (17.0 +/- 7.4 min) than group PR (6.9 +/- 2.6 min, 9.3 +/- 2.2 min, and 9.4 +/- 2.4 min, respectively) or group DR (5.4 +/- 0.8 min, 6.1 +/- 1.0 min, and 6.2 +/- 1.0 min, respectively). The anesthetic regimen with desflurane and remifentanil allowed faster awakening during and after surgery that permitted immediate neurological examination after spinal surgery compared with propofol/remifentanil.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialXenon does not prolong neuromuscular block of rocuronium.
With the exception of xenon, the interaction between muscle relaxants and inhaled anesthetics is known. We therefore compared the pharmacodynamics of rocuronium during xenon anesthesia versus a total IV anesthesia with propofol. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and remifentanil in both the xenon and propofol groups (each n = 20). ⋯ Anesthesia was maintained with xenon and remifentanil (xenon group) or with propofol and remifentanil (propofol group). There were no significant differences between the groups concerning the onset time (xenon group 125 +/- 33 and propofol group 144 +/- 43 s), duration (xenon group 33.2 +/- 10.8 and propofol group 32.6 +/- 8.4 min), recovery index (xenon group 9.4 +/- 6.6 and propofol group 8.4 +/- 5.3 min), and clinical recovery (xenon group 18.0 +/- 10.2 and propofol group 17.1 +/- 8.5 min). We conclude that the neuromuscular blocking effects of rocuronium are not different when given during propofol versus xenon anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of unilateral spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine, ropivacaine, or levobupivacaine for inguinal herniorrhaphy.
In 60 patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair, we compared the clinical profile of unilateral spinal anesthesia produced with either 8 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (n = 20), 8 mg of hyperbaric levobupivacaine 0.5% (n = 20), or 12 mg of hyperbaric ropivacaine 0.5% (n = 20). The study drug was injected slowly through a 25-gauge Whitacre directional needle and patients maintained the lateral decubitus position for 15 min. ⋯ Complete regression of spinal anesthesia occurred after 166 +/- 42 min with ropivacaine, 210 +/- 63 min with levobupivacaine, and 190 +/- 51 min with bupivacaine (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively); however, no differences were observed in time for home discharge (329 +/- 89 min with bupivacaine, 261 +/- 112 min with levobupivacaine, and 332 +/- 57 min with ropivacaine [P = 0.28]). We conclude that 8 mg of levobupivacaine or 12 mg of ropivacaine are acceptable alternatives to 8 mg of bupivacaine when limiting spinal block at the operative side for inguinal hernia repair.