Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialCombined spinal-epidural anesthesia using epidural volume extension leads to faster motor recovery after elective cesarean delivery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
Epidural volume extension (EVE) via a combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique is the enhancement of a small-dose intrathecal block by epidural saline boluses. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we compared the EVE technique with single-shot spinal anesthesia with respect to its sensory and motor block profile and hemodynamic stability. Sixty-two parturients (n = 31 in each group) undergoing elective cesarean deliveries were administered either spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine 9 mg and fentanyl 10 microg or CSE comprising intrathecal hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine 5 mg with fentanyl 10 microg, followed by 0.9% saline 6.0 mL through the epidural catheter 5 min thereafter. In each group, the lowest systolic blood pressure (SBP), sensory block level to loss of pain from pinprick, and modified Bromage scores were recorded at 2.5-min intervals. The visual analog pain score (VAS), peak sensory block height, highest modified Bromage motor score, time for sensory regression to the tenth thoracic dermatome (T10), and motor block recovery were compared between groups. Both groups were comparable in demographic data, VAS scores, peak sensory block height, time for sensory regression to T10, and lowest SBP recorded. Patients in the EVE group demonstrated significantly faster motor recovery to modified Bromage 0 (73 +/- 33 min versus 136 +/- 32 min, P < 0.05). ⋯ When compared with conventional, single-shot spinal anesthesia, epidural volume extension of a small-dose spinal block provides satisfactory anesthesia for cesarean delivery with only 55% of the bupivacaine dose required and is associated with faster motor recovery of the lower limbs.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialDextromethorphan-associated epidural patient-controlled analgesia provides better pain- and analgesics-sparing effects than dextromethorphan-associated intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after bone-malignancy resection: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded study.
Pain after bone malignancy surgery is intense and requires large amounts of analgesics. The augmented antinociceptive effects of dextromethorphan (DM), a N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, were demonstrated previously. We assessed the use of postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) or IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in patients undergoing surgery for bone malignancy under standardized combined general and epidural anesthesia with or without DM. Patients (n = 120) were randomly allocated to receive PCEA (ropivacaine 3.2 mg plus fentanyl 8 microg/dose) or IV-PCA (morphine 2 mg/dose) postoperatively, starting at subjective visual analog scale pain intensity >or=4 of 10 for up to 96 h. Placebo or DM 90 mg orally (30 patients/group/set) was given in a double-blinded manner before surgery and for 2 days afterwards. Diclofenac 75 mg IM was available as a rescue drug. DM patients used PCA and rated their pain >50% less than their placebo counterparts in each set, especially during the first 2 postoperative days (P < 0.01). Hourly and overall maximal pain intensity among PCEA patients was approximately 50% less than in the IV-PCA set (P < 0.01). Diclofenac was used 42% less (P < 0.01) by the PCA-DM patients compared with their placebo counterparts. Seven PCEA-DM and 11 IV-PCA-DM individuals reported having side effects compared with 44 in the PCEA-placebo and the IV-PCA-placebo groups (P < 0.01). Time to first ambulation was similar with both analgesia techniques but shorter among the DM-treated patients compared with the placebo recipients (1.5 +/- 0.8 versus 2.1 +/- 1.1 days, P = 0.02). Thus, DM afforded better pain control and reduced the demand for analgesics, augmented the PCEA effect versus IV-PCA, and was associated with minimal untoward effects in each analgesia set. DM patients ambulated earlier than placebo recipients. ⋯ Patients undergoing bone-malignancy surgery under combined general and epidural anesthesia received randomly patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) or IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) postoperatively and dextromethorphan (DM) 90 mg or placebo double-blindly for 3 days (n = 30/group/set). The DM effect was recorded with minimal untoward effects: it afforded better pain control and reduced the demand for analgesics compared with the placebo, especially when associated with PCEA. DM patients ambulated earlier than placebo recipients.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialTreatment of hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation using intravenous almitrine.
We performed this prospective randomized double-blinded study to assess the ability of almitrine to treat hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation (OLV). Twenty-eight patients were anesthetized with propofol, sufentanil, and atracurium; lung separation was achieved with a double-lumen tube. A transesophageal Doppler probe was inserted to evaluate cardiac index. If SpO(2) was equal to or decreased to <95% during OLV (inspired fraction of oxygen of 0.6), patients were included in the study and received a placebo or almitrine (12 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 10 min followed by 4 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) infusion until SpO(2) reached 90% or decreased to <90% (exclusion from the study). Eighteen of the 28 patients were included and received either almitrine (n = 9) or a placebo (n = 9). Treatment was discontinued in 1 patient in the almitrine group and 6 in the placebo group (P < 0.05). Treatment was successful (SpO(2) remaining >or=95% during OLV) in 8 patients in the almitrine group and 1 in the placebo group (P < 0.01). Heart rate, arterial blood pressure, and cardiac index did not change throughout the study, but we could obtain an adequate aortic blood flow signal in only half of the patients. Almitrine could be used to treat hypoxemia during OLV. ⋯ IV almitrine improves oxygenation during one-lung ventilation without hemodynamic modification. Such treatment could be used when conventional ventilatory strategy fails to treat hypoxemia or cannot be used.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialProphylactic treatment with desmopressin does not reduce postoperative bleeding after coronary surgery in patients treated with aspirin before surgery.
The synthetic vasopressin analog desmopressin has hemostatic properties and may reduce postoperative bleeding after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). A study on the effects of recent aspirin ingestion on platelet function in cardiac surgery showed a greater impairment of platelet function in patients treated with aspirin <2 days before the operation. We evaluated the effects of desmopressin on postoperative bleeding in CABG patients who were treated with aspirin 75 or 160 mg until the day before surgery. The study was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial. One-hundred patients were included and divided into two groups. One group received desmopressin 0.3 micro g/kg and the other received placebo (0.9% NaCl) after the neutralization of heparin with protamine sulfate. Postoperative blood loss was recorded for 16 h. The mean (SD) bleeding was 606 (237) mL in the desmopressin group and 601 (301) mL in the placebo group (P = 0.93), representing no significant difference (95% confidence interval, -107 to 117 mL). We conclude that desmopressin does not reduce postoperative bleeding in CABG patients treated with aspirin until the day before surgery. ⋯ Continuation of aspirin until the day before coronary artery bypass grafting may increase postoperative bleeding. The administration of desmopressin to these patients after the neutralization of heparin with protamine sulfate does not reduce postoperative bleeding.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialProphylactic phenylephrine infusion for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
In a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial, we investigated the prophylactic infusion of IV phenylephrine for the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Immediately after intrathecal injection, phenylephrine was infused at 100 microg/min (n = 26) for 3 min. From that point until delivery, phenylephrine was infused at 100 microg/min whenever systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP), measured each minute, was less than baseline. A control group (n = 24) received IV bolus phenylephrine 100 microg after each measurement of SAP <80% of baseline. Phenylephrine infusion decreased the incidence (6 [23%] of 26 versus 21 [88%] of 24; P < 0.0001), frequency, and magnitude (median minimum SAP, 106 mm Hg; interquartile range, 95-111 mm Hg; versus median, 80 mm Hg; range, 73-93 mm Hg; P < 0.0001) of hypotension compared with control. Heart rate was significantly slower over time in the infusion group compared with the control group (P < 0.0001). Despite a large total dose of phenylephrine administered to the infusion group compared with the control group (median, 1260 microg; interquartile range, 1010-1640 microg; versus median, 450 microg; interquartile range, 300-750 microg; P < 0.0001), umbilical cord blood gases and Apgar scores were similar. One patient in each group had umbilical arterial pH <7.2. Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion is a simple, safe, and effective method of maintaining arterial blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. ⋯ In patients receiving spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery, a prophylactic infusion of phenylephrine 100 microg/min decreased the incidence, frequency, and magnitude of hypotension with equivalent neonatal outcome compared with a control group receiving IV bolus phenylephrine.