Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe effects of spread of block and adrenaline on cardiac output after epidural anesthesia in young children: a randomized, double-blind, prospective study.
Epidural anesthesia is considered to be without significant hemodynamic consequence in young children. However, conversely to adults, few studies have investigated cardiac output. Using transesophageal Doppler monitoring of cardiac output, we prospectively investigated hemodynamic alterations in 48 children (median age, 22.5 mo) receiving sevoflurane general anesthesia combined with caudal or thoracolumbar epidural anesthesia. They were randomly assigned to receive 0.8 mL/kg of plain local anesthetic mixture (lidocaine 1% + bupivacaine 0.25% (50/50) + 1 microg/mL of fentanyl) or 1 mL/kg of the same mixture with 5 microg/mL of adrenaline. No significant hemodynamic alteration was elicited in caudal and thoracolumbar groups receiving the plain mixture except a moderate decrease in heart rate. Conversely, a mixture with adrenaline added provoked a significant decrease in mean arterial blood pressure by 14% and 17%, in systemic vascular resistance by 24% and 40%, and an increase in cardiac output by 20% and 34% in caudal and thoracolumbar groups, respectively. The adrenaline effect was greater by the thoracolumbar than the caudal approach. In young children, epidural anesthesia induces an increase in cardiac output only when adrenaline is added to local anesthetics, probably through its systemic absorption from the epidural space. ⋯ Epidural anesthesia may induce significant hemodynamic changes, well documented in adults. Using noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in children, we reported an increase in cardiac output and a decrease in arterial blood pressure only when epinephrine was added to epidurally-injected local anesthetics.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEpidural infusions of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for labor analgesia: a randomized, double-blind study of obstetric outcome.
Studies have shown better obstetric outcome when ropivacaine 0.25% was used for labor epidural analgesia compared with bupivacaine 0.25%, but it is controversial whether there is any difference at smaller concentrations. In a prospective, double-blind trial, we randomized 350 ASA physical status I and II parturients with term cephalic singleton pregnancies to receive epidural labor analgesia using ropivacaine or bupivacaine. Analgesia was initiated with a 0.25% solution and maintained with a continuous infusion of a 0.1% solution with fentanyl 0.0002%. Supplementary boluses of 0.25% solution were given when requested. Labor was managed according to institutional standard labor ward protocols. Among patients who delivered vaginally, the duration of the first stage of labor was shorter in the ropivacaine group (median, 520 min; interquartile range, 377-745 min) compared with the bupivacaine group (645 min; interquartile range, 460-820 min; P = 0.009), but there was no difference in any other obstetric or neonatal outcomes. The mode of delivery was similar between groups, with operative (instrumental vaginal and cesarean) delivery rates of 61.8% (95% confidence interval, 54.4%-68.8%) in the ropivacaine group and 58.4% (95% confidence interval, 50.9%-65.5%) in the bupivacaine group (P = 0.72). ⋯ In a randomized-controlled study, we found no major outcome advantage of continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl 0.0002% over bupivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl 0.0002% for labor analgesia. Although ropivacaine was associated with a shorter first stage of labor, the relative difference is probably of limited clinical importance, and there was no difference in the mode of delivery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialSingle-dose haloperidol for the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting after intrathecal morphine.
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) occurs frequently with the use of intrathecal morphine. We studied the ability of a single, small dose of the inexpensive, long-acting, dopamine receptor-blocking drug, haloperidol, to prevent PONV after spinal anesthesia using local anesthetic with morphine 0.3 mg. One-hundred-eight adult patients undergoing elective lower limb orthopedic or endoscopic urologic procedures under spinal anesthesia were randomized to receive IM haloperidol 1 mg (H1), haloperidol 2 mg (H2), or placebo (P) after an intrathecal injection. Patients were assessed for 24 h after surgery, with treatment failure being defined as nausea >1 on a 10-cm visual analog scale or any vomiting or request for rescue antiemetic. Most treatment failures occurred during the first 12 h (60% overall), and haloperidol led to a dose-dependent decrease in PONV (first 12 h: 76% P, 56% H1, and 50% H2; P = 0.012). A history of PONV was strongly associated with PONV in the current study, regardless of treatment group. There were no dystonic reactions noted to either dose of haloperidol. We conclude that haloperidol reduces the incidence of PONV after intrathecal morphine, although this incidence remains a significant problem even with treatment. ⋯ In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, a single, small IM dose of haloperidol 1 mg or 2 mg reduced the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after spinal anesthesia with local anesthetic and intrathecal morphine.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialTramadol added to 1.5% mepivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block improves postoperative analgesia dose-dependently.
Adjuncts to local anesthetics for peripheral plexus blockade may enhance the quality and duration of anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. The analgesic, tramadol, has a unique mechanism of action that suggests efficacy as such an adjunct. It displays a central analgesic and peripheral local anesthetic effect. We designed a prospective, randomized, controlled and double-blind clinical trial to assess the effect of tramadol added to brachial plexus anesthesia. One-hundred patients scheduled for carpal tunnel release surgery under brachial plexus anesthesia were randomized into four groups. All patients received 1.5% mepivacaine 40 mL plus a study solution containing either isotonic sodium chloride (Group P, n = 17), tramadol 40 mg (Group T(40), n = 22), tramadol 100 mg (Group T(100), n = 20) or tramadol 200 mg (Group T(200), n = 20). We evaluated the time of onset of anesthesia, duration of sensory and motor blockade, duration and quality of postoperative analgesia, and occurrence of adverse effects. Onset and duration of sensory and motor blocks were not different among groups. The number of patients requesting analgesia in the postoperative period was significantly less in the 3 tramadol groups compared with the placebo group (P = 0.02); this was also noted with the placebo and T(40) groups compared with the T(200) group. No statistical significance was demonstrated between the placebo and the T(40) group or the T(100) group and the T(200) group. Furthermore, there was a significant trend effect among groups applying the Cochran-Armitage tendency test (P = 0.003), suggesting a dose-dependent decrease for additional postoperative analgesia requirements when tramadol was added. Side effects did not differ among groups, although they were more frequently recorded in the T groups. Our study suggests that tramadol added to 1.5% mepivacaine for brachial plexus block enhances in a dose-dependent manner the duration of analgesia with acceptable side effects. However, the safety of tramadol has to be investigated before allowing its use in clinical practice. ⋯ Tramadol's unique mechanism of action suggests efficacy as a local anesthetic adjunct for peripheral plexus blockade. Our study demonstrates that tramadol, added to mepivacaine for brachial plexus anesthesia, extends the duration and improves the quality of postoperative analgesia in a dose dependent fashion with acceptable side effects.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAcetylsalicylic acid, diclofenac, and lornoxicam, but not rofecoxib, affect platelet CD 62 expression.
Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are routinely administered in the perioperative period. Because of the absence of cyclooxygenase-2 in platelets, cyclooxygenase-2-selective drugs are thought not to cause platelet inhibition. Because platelets play an important role in the coagulation process, the absence of platelet function inhibition may lead to fewer bleeding complications after surgery. We studied the influence of aspirin, diclofenac, lornoxicam, and rofecoxib on arachidonic acid and collagen-induced CD 62 P (P selectin) expression by using flow cytometry. Blood from 68 volunteers was obtained before and 1, 3, and 12 h after the oral ingestion of 1 of the randomly assigned study medications. Aspirin, diclofenac, and lornoxicam had a significant effect on arachidonic acid and collagen-induced CD 62 P expression in platelets, whereas rofecoxib did not show this effect. We conclude that rofecoxib is safe to use perioperatively with respect to inhibition of platelet function. ⋯ We compared the effect of rofecoxib and three nonselective nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on platelet function, measured by CD 62 P expression. Platelet function was not altered by rofecoxib, but it was inhibited by aspirin, diclofenac, and lornoxicam. Rofecoxib may be safer than classic NSAIDs with respect to platelet function during the perioperative period.