Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialImprovement of pain treatment after major abdominal surgery by intravenous S+-ketamine.
The use of intraoperative racemic ketamine for pain prevention after abdominal surgery is controversial. We compared one preincisional i.v. injection of S(+)-ketamine with its preincisional and repeated intraoperative use in 45 patients undergoing surgery with epidural and general anesthesia. S(+)-ketamine is a new drug formulation that contains the more potent S(+)-stereoisomer of ketamine. Patients were randomized to receive placebo, 0.5 mg/kg preincisional S(+)ketamine, or 0.5 mg/kg preincisional and 0.2 mg/kg intraoperative S(+)-ketamine repeated at 20-min intervals. In the postoperative period, epidural ropivacaine (2 mg/mL; 0.12 mL.kg(-1).h(-1)) was infused for pain therapy. Patients who received repeated S(+)-ketamine reported smaller pain scores than those who received placebo after awakening and 3 and 6 h later (P < or = 0.05). Fewer patients with repeated S(+)-ketamine required additional analgesics than those with placebo (P < or = 0.05). Cumulative consumption of additional diclofenac and dextropropoxyphene at 24 h was less after single (P < 0.05) and repeated (P < 0.05) S(+)-ketamine versus placebo. After awakening, patients who received repeated S(+)-ketamine reported being in a better mood than those in the other groups (P < 0.05). No psychotomimetic side effects were noted. In conclusion, preincisional and repeated intraoperative small-dose S(+)-ketamine added to general and epidural anesthesia causes better postoperative pain relief than general and epidural anesthesia alone. ⋯ After major visceral surgery, preincisional and repeated intraoperative small-dose S(+)-ketamine added to general and epidural anesthesia causes better postoperative pain relief than general and epidural anesthesia alone.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2004
Clinical TrialIs bilateral monitoring of cerebral oxygen saturation necessary during neonatal aortic arch reconstruction?
In this study, we measured cerebral oxygenation in both cerebral hemispheres by using near-infrared spectroscopy before, during, and after regional low-flow cerebral perfusion (RLFP) to determine whether bilateral monitoring was necessary. Neonates undergoing aortic arch reconstruction with RLFP were studied. The bilateral regional cerebral oxygenation index was measured and recorded at 1-min intervals during the following periods: 1) before bypass, 2) during bypass before RLFP, 3) during RLFP, 4) on bypass after RLFP, and 5) post-bypass. Before bypass and on bypass before RLFP, the correlation (r = 0.979 and 0.852) and agreement (mean bias, right versus left, 0 and +2) between hemispheres were excellent. During RLFP, however, correlation (r = 0.35) and agreement (mean bias of the right versus left side, +6.3) worsened and only partially returned to baseline values after RLFP. Nine of 19 patients had sustained differences in cerebral oxygen saturation of >10%, always with the left side values less than the right. Bilateral monitoring detects desaturation in the left cerebral hemisphere during RLFP. The long-term consequences of lower saturations on the left side of the brain are unclear. ⋯ Left-sided cerebral hemisphere oxygen saturation, measured with near-infrared spectroscopy, was less than right-sided cerebral oxygen saturation during regional low-flow cerebral perfusion used for neonatal aortic arch reconstruction.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2004
The failure of retrograde autologous priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit to reduce blood use after cardiac surgical procedures.
Hemodilution during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a primary risk factor for blood transfusion in cardiac surgical patients. Priming of the CPB circuit with the patients' own blood (retrograde autologous priming, RAP) is a technique used to limit hemodilution and reduce transfusion requirements. We designed this study to examine the impact of RAP on perioperative blood product use. Using a retrospective cohort study design, the medical records of all patients undergoing CPB (excluding circulatory arrest cases) by a single surgeon were examined. Data were collected over a 24-mo period when RAP was routinely used as a blood conservation strategy (RAP group, n = 257). This group was compared with a cohort of patients during the 24 mo immediately preceding the introduction of RAP into clinical practice (no RAP group, n = 288). A small, statistically insignificant reduction in the percentage of patients receiving packed red blood cells was observed in the RAP group (44% versus 51% no RAP, P = 0.083). No differences were found between the groups in the number of units of packed red blood cells, platelets, or fresh frozen plasma transfused throughout the perioperative period. These results suggest that overall, RAP does not offer a clinically important benefit as a blood conservation technique. ⋯ Priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit with the patients' own blood (retrograde autologous priming) resulted in insignificant reductions in blood use in a large, unselected group of patients undergoing cardiac surgical procedures.
-
We accomplished endotracheal intubation by using fluoroscopic direction in a patient presenting a difficult airway both on the basis of a preanesthetic physical examination and on the basis of a potential for cervical cord injury associated with complicated laryngoscopy. Under topical anesthesia, a multipurpose angiographic (MPA) catheter over a Bentson wire was advanced into the trachea under intermittent C-arm fluoroscopic guidance while the occiput, cervical spine, and mandible remained in a neutral position. The endotracheal tube was then easily advanced over the MPA catheter into the trachea, where the location was documented by fluoroscopic view. Because of judicious use of topical anesthesia and the small diameter and flexibility of the MPA catheter, the unsedated patient remained comfortable throughout the procedure. The stored data were later transferred to a compact disk, and a copy was provided to the patient as an adjunct to Medic-Alert. Unlike fiberoscopy, with which the view can be totally obscured by secretions, blood, and abnormal anatomy, the direction and location of the MPA catheter within the airway were easily identifiable throughout the procedure. The small diameter of the MPA (1.5-mm outer diameter) should allow placement of endotracheal tubes as small as 3.0-mm inner diameter--an option not available even with pediatric instruments. Although time was not a consideration, the procedure was accomplished in <12 min with 22 s of fluoroscopy. We believe that with experience, atraumatic intubation of a difficult airway could be accomplished routinely in less than 2 min with radiological-assisted intubation. ⋯ Radiologic-assisted intubation facilitated endotracheal intubation without sedation, instrumentation, or significant movement of the occiput, cervical spine, or mandible. The procedure was accomplished in <12 min and with only 22 s of fluoroscopy. This approach provides the ultimate adjunct to the preoperative airway physical evaluation while providing for immediate (or delayed) atraumatic endotracheal intubation. The diagnostic information and procedure can be recorded on a compact disk.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2004
A survey of orthopedic surgeons' attitudes and knowledge regarding regional anesthesia.
We conducted a survey to explore the surgical attitudes and preferences regarding regional anesthesia among Canadian orthopedic surgeons. Surveys were returned by 468 (61%) of 768 surgeons. Forty-eight percent of respondents directed their patients' choice of anesthetic. Forty percent of surgeons directed their patients to choose regional anesthesia. The principal reasons for favoring regional anesthesia were less postoperative pain (32%), decreased nausea and vomiting (12%), and safety (14%). Reasons for not favoring regional anesthesia were delays in the induction of anesthesia (43%) and an unpredictable success rate (12%). This survey suggests that orthopedic surgeons are supportive of regional anesthesia. Barriers to increased popularity include perceived delays and unreliability. ⋯ Orthopedic surgeons understand the benefits of and are supportive of the use of regional anesthesia in their practices. Barriers to increased popularity include perceived operating room delays and lack of reliability.