Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialMetoprolol and coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: does intraoperative metoprolol attenuate acute beta-adrenergic receptor desensitization during cardiac surgery?
Cardiac surgery results in significant impairment of beta-adrenergic receptor (beta AR) function and is a cause of depressed myocardial function after surgery. We previously demonstrated that acute administration of beta AR blocker during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in an animal model of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery attenuates beta AR desensitization, whereas chronic oral beta-blockade therapy in patients undergoing CABG surgery does not prevent it. Therefore we hypothesized that acute administration of metoprolol during CABG surgery would prevent acute myocardial beta AR desensitization. A placebo-controlled initial phase (n = 72) was performed whereby patients were randomized to either metoprolol 10 mg or placebo immediately before CPB. Then a second dose-finding study was performed where patients received 20 mg (n = 20) or 30 mg (n = 20) of metoprolol. Hemodynamic monitoring, atrial membrane adenylyl cyclase activity, atrial beta AR density, and postoperative outcomes were measured. All groups showed similar decreases in isoproterenol-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity (13%-24%). Cardiac output remained similar in all 4 groups throughout the intraoperative and postoperative period. In addition, patients receiving metoprolol 20 or 30 mg had less supraventricular arrhythmias 24 h postoperatively compared with patients receiving metoprolol 10 mg or placebo. Therefore, unlike our previous animal model of CABG surgery, metoprolol did not attenuate myocardial beta AR desensitization. ⋯ We investigated whether IV metoprolol given during cardiac surgery attenuates myocardial beta-adrenergic receptor (beta AR) desensitization. Although metoprolol did not reduce beta AR desensitization, the incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias was reduced by 75% in patients receiving 20 mg or 30 mg metoprolol.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialIntraoperative moderate acute normovolemic hemodilution associated with a comprehensive blood-sparing protocol in off-pump coronary surgery.
We evaluated the blood-sparing effects of intraoperative moderate acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) combined with intraoperative tranexamic acid treatment and shed blood reinfusion in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). One-hundred consecutive OPCAB patients (baseline hematocrit >34%) were prospectively randomized to tranexamic acid treatment (control group; 50 patients) or to tranexamic acid treatment plus normovolemic (1:1 replacement with colloids) withdrawal of 17% +/- 2% of the circulating blood volume (ANH group; 50 patients). All patients had shed blood reinfused with intraoperative bleeding in excess of 250 mL. The requirement for allogeneic transfusions, based on strict a priori defined criteria, was the primary end point of the study. Hematochemical evaluations, bleeding, major complications, and other outcomes were also recorded. Demographics, baseline hematochemical data, and operative characteristics were similar in the two groups. Patients in the ANH group had a median of 850 mL of blood withdrawn and showed a lower intraoperative minimum hematocrit (31% vs 37%; P < 0.0001). Two patients in the ANH group versus 10 patients in the control group (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.89; P = 0.028) required transfusion of a significantly smaller number of packed red blood cell units (5 vs 24; P < 0.001). Postoperative hematochemical variables, bleeding, and outcomes were similar in the two groups of patients. Moderate ANH, combined with tranexamic acid administration and on-demand shed blood reinfusion, may reduce allogeneic transfusion requirements in OPCAB patients. ⋯ We studied the blood-sparing effects of moderate acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) in 100 patients undergoing off-pump coronary surgery (OPCAB). Combined with tranexamic acid administration and shed blood reinfusion when the intraoperative bleeding exceeded 250 mL, ANH was effective in reducing the number of OPCAB patients who required allogeneic transfusions and the number of packed red blood cell units transfused.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of the clinical usefulness of three different electroencephalogram monitors: Bispectral Index, processed electroencephalogram, and Alaris auditory evoked potentials.
We compared the usefulness of the Bispectral Index (BIS), Processed electroencephalogram (pEEG), and Alaris auditory evoked potentials (A-AEP). Ninety females scheduled for mastectomy were divided into three groups. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl to insert a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and was maintained by adding nitrous oxide. EEG was monitored by either BIS, spectral edge frequency by pEEG, or A-AEP index by A-AEP. We recorded the number of patients with impedance low enough to extract good EEG signals at the first electrodes application (success rate), the number with an index outside of the range considered appropriate for general anesthesia (inappropriateness rate), changes of the index by LMA insertion or surgical incision (responsiveness), and time to return to good EEG signals after signal disturbance by electric cautery (recovery time). The success rate was larger in BIS > or = A-AEP > pEEG. The inappropriateness rate was smaller in A-AEP < or = BIS , or = pEEG. The A-AEP group showed the largest responsiveness. The recovery time was shorter in pEEG < A-AEP < BIS. In summary, the BIS had the largest success rate, the A-AEP had the least inappropriateness rate and the largest responsiveness, and the pEEG had the fastest recovery time. ⋯ We compared the usefulness of three electroencephalogram monitors. The Bispectral Index was the easiest for obtaining low impedance, the auditory evoked potential index had the least inappropriateness rate for general anesthesia and had the largest responsiveness, and the spectral edge frequency was the fastest in stabilizing measurement after electric cautery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPrevention of atelectasis formation during the induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients.
Atelectasis caused by general anesthesia is increased in morbidly obese patients. We have shown that application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during the induction of anesthesia prevents atelectasis formation in nonobese patients. We therefore studied the efficacy of PEEP in morbidly obese patients to prevent atelectasis. Twenty-three adult morbidly obese patients (body mass index >35 kg/m(2)) were randomly assigned to one of two groups. In the PEEP group, patients breathed 100% oxygen (5 min) with a continuous positive airway pressure of 10 cm H(2)O and, after the induction, mechanical ventilation via a face mask with a PEEP of 10 cm H(2)O. In the control group, the same induction was applied but without continuous positive airway pressure or PEEP. Atelectasis, determined by computed tomography, and blood gas analysis were measured twice: before the induction and directly after intubation. After endotracheal intubation, patients of the control group showed an increase in the amount of atelectasis, which was much larger than in the PEEP group (10.4% +/- 4.8% in control group versus 1.7% +/- 1.3% in PEEP group; P < 0.001). After intubation with a fraction of inspired oxygen of 1.0, PaO(2) was significantly higher in the PEEP group compared with the control group (457 +/- 130 mm Hg versus 315 +/- 100 mm Hg, respectively; P = 0.035) We conclude that in morbidly obese patients, atelectasis formation is largely prevented by PEEP applied during the anesthetic induction and is associated with a better oxygenation. ⋯ Application of positive end-expiratory pressure during induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients prevents atelectasis formation and improves oxygenation. Therefore, this technique should be considered for anesthesia induction in morbidly obese patients.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialImprovement of pain treatment after major abdominal surgery by intravenous S+-ketamine.
The use of intraoperative racemic ketamine for pain prevention after abdominal surgery is controversial. We compared one preincisional i.v. injection of S(+)-ketamine with its preincisional and repeated intraoperative use in 45 patients undergoing surgery with epidural and general anesthesia. S(+)-ketamine is a new drug formulation that contains the more potent S(+)-stereoisomer of ketamine. Patients were randomized to receive placebo, 0.5 mg/kg preincisional S(+)ketamine, or 0.5 mg/kg preincisional and 0.2 mg/kg intraoperative S(+)-ketamine repeated at 20-min intervals. In the postoperative period, epidural ropivacaine (2 mg/mL; 0.12 mL.kg(-1).h(-1)) was infused for pain therapy. Patients who received repeated S(+)-ketamine reported smaller pain scores than those who received placebo after awakening and 3 and 6 h later (P < or = 0.05). Fewer patients with repeated S(+)-ketamine required additional analgesics than those with placebo (P < or = 0.05). Cumulative consumption of additional diclofenac and dextropropoxyphene at 24 h was less after single (P < 0.05) and repeated (P < 0.05) S(+)-ketamine versus placebo. After awakening, patients who received repeated S(+)-ketamine reported being in a better mood than those in the other groups (P < 0.05). No psychotomimetic side effects were noted. In conclusion, preincisional and repeated intraoperative small-dose S(+)-ketamine added to general and epidural anesthesia causes better postoperative pain relief than general and epidural anesthesia alone. ⋯ After major visceral surgery, preincisional and repeated intraoperative small-dose S(+)-ketamine added to general and epidural anesthesia causes better postoperative pain relief than general and epidural anesthesia alone.