Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2004
Comparative StudyA comparison of frontal and occipital bispectral index values obtained during neurosurgical procedures.
We placed bispectral index (BIS) sensors on the frontal and occipital areas of neurosurgical patients and compared BIS values obtained from both areas during propofol/fentanyl anesthesia. BIS showed a strong correlation between frontal and occipital montages (r(2) = 0.96; P = 0.03). It may be valid to measure BIS with the sensor on the occipital area if required during frontal neurosurgical procedures. ⋯ Bispectral values were positively correlated when recorded from frontal and occipital sensors in patients undergoing clipping of unruptured cerebral aneurysms while anesthetized with propofol and fentanyl.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2004
Case Reports Comparative StudyReversal of direct thrombin inhibition after cardiopulmonary bypass in a patient with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
We treated persistent hemorrhage after cardiopulmonary bypass in a heart transplant recipient who had received anticoagulation with the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin by a combination therapy aimed at reducing the plasma concentration of the thrombin antagonist (hemodialysis and modified ultrafiltration), increasing the concentration of thrombin at bleeding sites (recombinant factor VIIa), and increasing the plasma concentration of other coagulation factors (fresh frozen plasma and cryoprecipitate). The bleeding was controlled, and there was no thrombotic complication. ⋯ A combination of modified ultrafiltration, hemodialysis, and the administration of recombinant factor VIIa, fresh frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate may reverse the anticoagulant effect of bivalirudin.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2004
A simple, fast, easy method to identify the evidence base in pain-relief research: validation of a computer search strategy used alone to identify quality randomized controlled trials.
Clinicians need a simple, fast, reliable, and inexpensive way of identifying the evidence base relevant to their clinical practice. It is often believed that the only way to identify all relevant evidence is to perform hand-searches of the literature to supplement computer searches; this is complex and labor intensive. However, most of quality randomized controlled trials cited in systematic reviews in pain medicine are listed in computer databases. We performed two studies to investigate the efficiency-in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and precision-of three computer search strategies: Optimally Sensitive Search Strategy, which is used by the Cochrane Collaboration; RCT.pt, a standard MEDLINE strategy; and DBRCT.af, which is a new single-line computer algorithm based on the assumption that double-blinded, randomized controlled trials would be indexed with "double-blind," "random," or variations of these terms in MEDLINE and EMBASE. DBRCT.af was found to be highly sensitive (97%) in identifying quality randomized controlled trials in pain medicine. The precision (ratio of randomized controlled trials to the number of nonrandomized trials identified) was 82%, and the specificity in excluding the nonrandomized controlled trials was 98%. We conclude that clinicians can now use DBRCT.af to update and conduct de novo systematic reviews in pain-relief research. ⋯ Quality evidence about what is good clinical practice in pain treatment is buried in the medical literature among large quantities of other information. This article describes how any clinician with access to the Internet can identify those quality studies reliably, quickly, and inexpensively.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2004
Comparative StudyIncreasing the value of time reduces the lost economic opportunity of caring for surgeries of longer-than-average times.
Anesthesiology groups that provide care for surgical procedures of longer-than-average duration are economically disadvantaged by both increased staffing costs and reduced revenue. Under the current billing system, anesthesia time is valued the same regardless of the total case duration. In this study, we evaluated the effect on four academic anesthesiology departments of two hypothetical scenarios by changing the anesthesia care billing system to make more valuable either 1) all time units or 2) just second-hour and subsequent time units. From the four departments, case-specific data (anesthesia Current Procedural Terminology code and minutes of care) were collected for all anesthesia cases billed for 1 yr. Basic units were determined from the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) relative value guide. The average time for each case was defined as the average anesthesia time for that specific Current Procedural Terminology code, as published by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The actual total ASA units per hour (tASA/h) was determined by adding all the basic units and time units and dividing by hours of anesthesia care (minutes of anesthesia care divided by 60). We then calculated a hypothetical CMS tASA/h for each group by substituting the CMS average time for each anesthesia procedure time for the actual time reported by each group and using 15-min time units. For each group, the Actual (Act) tASA/h and CMS tASA/h were calculated for both options-changing the interval for all time units or only for second and subsequent hours. Intervals were 15, 12, 10, 7, 6, or 5 min. When changing all time units, Act tASA/h and CMS tASA/h were never equal for all groups. The two productivity measures became approximately equal if only time units after the first hour were changed to 6- to 7-min intervals. When changes were applied only to the Act tASA/h (with CMS tASA/h remaining at 15-min intervals), at the 12-min interval either option resulted in a similar or higher Act tASA/h than CMS tASA/h. Both options increase the value of time and help compensate for the lost economic opportunity of longer-than-average surgical durations. ⋯ Longer-than-average surgical durations result in less potential revenue per hour under current billing methodology. This study quantifies the increase in billing productivity when the value of time is increased, when evaluating the billing productivity of four academic anesthesiology groups.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2004
Comparative StudyLung recruitment improves the efficiency of ventilation and gas exchange during one-lung ventilation anesthesia.
Atelectasis in the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation (OLV) impairs arterial oxygenation and increases dead space. We studied the effect of an alveolar recruitment strategy (ARS) on gas exchange and lung efficiency during OLV by using the single-breath test of CO(2) (SBT-CO(2)). Twelve patients undergoing thoracic surgery were studied at three points in time: (a) during two-lung ventilation and (b) during OLV before and (c) after an ARS. The ARS was applied selectively to the dependent lung and consisted of an increase in peak inspiratory pressure up to 40 cm H(2)O combined with a peak end-expiratory pressure level of 20 cm H(2)O for 10 consecutive breaths. The ARS took approximately 3 min. Arterial blood gases, SBT-CO(2), and metabolic and hemodynamic variables were recorded at the end of each study period. Arterial oxygenation and dead space were better during two-lung ventilation compared with OLV. PaO(2) increased during OLV after lung recruitment (244 +/- 89 mm Hg) when compared with OLV without recruitment (144 +/- 73 mm Hg; P < 0.001). The SBT-CO(2) analysis showed a significant decrease in dead-space variables and an increase in the variables related to the efficiency of ventilation during OLV after an ARS when compared with OLV alone. In conclusion, ARS improves gas exchange and ventilation efficiency during OLV. ⋯ In this article, we showed how a pulmonary ventilatory maneuver performed in the dependent lung during one-lung ventilation anesthesia improved arterial oxygenation and dead space.