Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 2005
Retrograde submental intubation by pharyngeal loop technique in a patient with faciomaxillary trauma and restricted mouth opening.
Submental intubation is useful for airway management during maxillofacial surgery when both nasal and orotracheal intubation are deemed unsuitable and to avoid a tracheostomy, especially when long-term ventilatory support is not required in the postoperative period. Adequate mouth opening is a prerequisite for all the techniques described for submental intubation, as the initial step is orotracheal intubation. ⋯ We describe the technique of retrograde submental intubation with the help of a pharyngeal loop assembly for the first time in a patient with maxillofacial trauma and restricted mouth opening in whom oral and nasal intubations were not possible and tracheostomy was the only alternative. In this case report, with successful retrograde submental intubation, the potential complications associated with a short-term tracheostomy were avoided, as there was no indication for keeping a tracheostomy during the postoperative period.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 2005
Morphine can enhance the antiallodynic effect of intrathecal R-PIA in rats with nerve ligation injury.
Nerve ligation injury may produce a tactile allodynia. Intrathecal adenosine receptor agonists or morphine have an antiallodynic effect. In this study, we examined the effect of intrathecal morphine on the antiallodynic state induced by the adenosine A1 receptor agonist, N(6)-(2-phenylisopropyl)-adenosine R-(-)isomer (R-PIA), in a rat model of nerve ligation injury. ⋯ Intrathecal morphine synergistically enhanced the antiallodynic effect of R-PIA when coadministered. Intrathecal naloxone and DPCPX reversed the maximal antiallodynic effect in the combination group. These results suggest that activation of mu-opioid and A1 receptors at the spinal level is required for the synergistic interaction on tactile allodynia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 2005
A review of the true methodological quality of nutritional support trials conducted in the critically ill: time for improvement.
In this review we sought to appraise the true methodological quality of nutritional support studies conducted in critically ill patients and to compare these findings to the methodological quality of sepsis trials. An extensive literature search revealed 111 randomized controlled trials conducted in critically ill patients evaluating the impact of nutritional support interventions on clinically meaningful outcomes. Compared with sepsis trials, nutritional support studies were significantly less likely to use blinding (32 of 40 versus 35 of 111, P < 0.001) or present an intention-to-treat analysis (37 of 40 versus 64 of 111, P < 0.001). ⋯ Although nutritional support studies demonstrated a significant increase in the use of blinding after the publication of the CONSORT statement in 1996 (9 of 47 versus 26 of 64 post-CONSORT, P = 0.023), there were no improvements in other key areas. Previous publications have described the overall methodological quality of sepsis trials as "poor." Nutritional support studies were significantly worse than sepsis trials in all aspects of methodological quality, and there were few improvements noted over time. To detect important differences in clinically meaningful outcomes in critical care, the methodological quality of future studies must be improved.