Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2006
Meta AnalysisA systematic review (meta-analysis) of the accuracy of the Mallampati tests to predict the difficult airway.
The original and modified Mallampati tests are commonly used to predict the difficult airway, but there is controversy regarding their accuracy. We searched MEDLINE and other databases for prospective studies of patients undergoing general anesthesia in which the results of a preoperative Mallampati test were compared with the subsequent rate of difficult airway (difficult laryngoscopy, difficult intubation, or difficult ventilation as reference tests). Forty-two studies enrolling 34,513 patients were included. ⋯ The Mallampati tests were poor at identifying difficult mask ventilation. Publication bias was not detected. Used alone, the Mallampati tests have limited accuracy for predicting the difficult airway and thus are not useful screening tests.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2006
Randomized Controlled TrialIntraoperative administration of tramadol for postoperative nurse-controlled analgesia resulted in earlier awakening and less sedation than morphine in children after cardiac surgery.
In adults, intraoperative administration of tramadol could result in earlier recovery and less sedation than morphine. In this controlled, randomized, double-blind study, we investigated whether an intraoperative initial dose of tramadol could cause more rapid awakening from general anesthesia, less sedation, and earlier tracheal extubation than morphine in children during the immediate postoperative period. Forty children aged 1-6 yr, scheduled for atrial or ventricular septal defect repair and tracheal extubation in the pediatric intensive care unit, were randomly allocated to receive morphine, initial dose 0.2 mg/kg, or tramadol 2 mg/kg given at the end of sternal closure, followed by nurse-controlled analgesia (bolus 0.02 mg/kg of morphine and 0.2 mg/kg of tramadol) with background infusions (0.015 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for morphine and 0.15 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for tramadol). ⋯ Times to first trigger of nurse-controlled analgesia bolus and objective pain scores during the 48 h observation period were comparable between groups. The incidence of desaturation and emesis were similar between groups. The patients ate well and did not differ on Day 1 or Day 2.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2006
ReviewThe use of hypertonic saline for treating intracranial hypertension after traumatic brain injury.
The past decade has witnessed a resurgence of interest in the use of hypertonic saline for low-volume resuscitation after trauma. Preliminary studies suggested that benefits are limited to a subgroup of trauma patients with brain injury, but a recent study of prehospital administration of hypertonic saline to patients with traumatic brain injury failed to confirm a benefit. ⋯ There are few clinical studies in traumatic brain injury with patient survival as an end point. In this review, we examined the experimental and clinical knowledge of hypertonic saline as an osmotherapeutic agent in neurotrauma.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2006
Comparative StudyBolus configuration affects dose requirements of intracarotid propofol for electroencephalographic silence.
We hypothesized that an intracarotid bolus injection of propofol to produce electroencephalographic (EEG) silence would require a smaller dose of the drug compared with the continuous infusion of the drug. Furthermore, the bolus propofol dose will be a function of the bolus characteristics in each bolus (mass/volume). We compared the dose requirements of intracarotid propofol needed to maintain EEG silence when delivered as bolus injections to continuous infusions in rabbits. ⋯ We found that the infusion rate of propofol required to sustain EEG silence was three-fold larger than the dose required by bolus injections, 22.8 +/- 11.9 vs 6.2 +/- 2.9 mL/h for infusion versus bolus, respectively (n = 7, P < 0.004). Furthermore, during bolus injection, the doses of propofol required to produce EEG silence were a direct function of the bolus volume and the mass of drug in each bolus, total dose = 3.6 + 29 x mg/bolus, n = 32, r = 0.85. For maximum regional effects of the bolus intracarotid drug injection, the bolus characteristics (volume and drug concentration) have to be optimized.