Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effects of clonidine premedication on sevoflurane requirements and anesthetic induction time.
We assessed the effects of oral clonidine preanesthetic medication (4.5 microg/kg) on the vital capacity rapid-inhalation anesthetic induction time (VCRII time) and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) to prevent a response to a verbal command in 50% of patients (MAC-Awake) by its hypnotic effect, and on MAC-Skin incision for the analgesic effect in patients anesthetized with sevoflurane. We studied 104 adult patients (control group: n = 52, clonidine group: n = 52) aged 30-48 yr scheduled to undergo general anesthesia. Fifty-two patients received oral clonidine 4.5 microg/kg 1.5 h before arrival in the operating room (clonidine group). The patients exhaled to residual volume and took three vital capacity breaths of 5% sevoflurane in oxygen. The VCRII time was defined as the time interval between the initiation of the VCRII and the disappearance of the response to verbal command. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane in oxygen and air. The end-tidal (ET) sevoflurane concentration reached a predetermined value, then the ratio of predetermined ET to inspiratory concentration was maintained at > or =0.95 for at least 15 min before skin incision. After skin incision, the patients were observed for gross purposeful muscular movements. MAC was defined as the average of the cross-over midpoints in each cross-over. After maintaining the ET sevoflurane concentration for 15 min, patients were judged to be awake or asleep. Average times for VCRII using 5% sevoflurane were achieved in 44+/-11 s (mean +/- SD) and 27+/-6 s in the control and clonidine groups, respectively (P = 0.0001). MAC-Awake values of sevoflurane were 0.66%+/-0.03% and 0.35%+/-0.02% (P = 0.0001), and MAC-Skin incision values were 1.97%+/-0.19% and 1.29%+/-0.13% (P = 0.0001) in the control and clonidine groups, respectively. These results suggest that clonidine may have a more potent hypnotic effect than analgesic effect. ⋯ Oral clonidine preanesthetic medication (4.5 microg/kg) significantly reduces vital capacity rapid inhalation anesthetic induction time and minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration awake for sevoflurane.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialQuality of emergence from anesthesia and incidence of vomiting with remifentanil in a pediatric population.
We conducted a randomized trial to compare the incidence of vomiting and the quality of emergence from anesthesia associated with the use of remifentanil versus a nonopiate. It was expected that remifentanil would provide smoother emergence from anesthesia with a comparably low rate of vomiting. The study sample consisted of 115 pediatric patients undergoing dental restoration and extraction who were randomly assigned to the nonopiate or remifentanil groups based on their hospital admission numbers. The nonopiate patients received sufficient desflurane to prevent movement, typically 7%-9%. The remifentanil group received remifentanil 0.2 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) and enough desflurane to prevent movement, typically 3.2%-3.6%. A trained postanesthesia care unit nurse, blinded to the anesthetic technique, assessed the quality of emergence and incidence of vomiting. Sixty-three patients received remifentanil and 52 received the nonopiate. The groups were not significantly different in either quality of emergence or incidence of vomiting. Remifentanil provided results comparable to a nonopiate with no increase in emesis. ⋯ A randomized, controlled clinical trial of 115 patients undergoing dental restoration indicated that an anesthetic technique using remifentanil provided quality of emergence comparable to and no greater incidence of vomiting than a nonopiate technique.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA controlled study of transesophageal echocardiography to guide central venous catheter placement in congenital heart surgery patients.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and central venous catheter (CVC) placement are often used during congenital cardiac surgery. Complications of CVC placement include cardiac perforation, inadvertent arterial placement, and erroneous hemodynamic data from unrecognized malposition. In this study, we used a prospective, randomized, controlled design to evaluate the use of TEE to guide depth of insertion and confirm superior vena cava cannulation, and to improve the percentage of correctly placed CVCs and reduce complications of CVC placement. One hundred forty-five patients were studied. Eighty patients were randomized to have subclavian vein insertion, 64 to have internal jugular insertion, and 1 to have external jugular insertion of CVC. TEE-guided CVC placement resulted in 100% correct placement when assessed by preoperative TEE, versus 86% in the control group (72 of 72 vs. 63 of 73; P = 0.01). There was no difference in correct placement between the two groups when assessed by postoperative chest radiograph (81.9% TEE versus 75.3% control; P = not significant). One significant complication, a superior vena cava perforation, occurred in the control group. Time to placement was 9.6 min in the TEE group versus 8.0 min in the control group (P = 0.015). ⋯ Transesophageal echocardiography can be used to guide central venous catheter placement in congenital heart surgery. Central venous catheters that seem to be located high in the right atrium by chest radiograph in these patients are often actually in the superior vena cava and pose little risk of cardiac perforation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPropofol anesthesia enhances pressor response to ephedrine in patients given clonidine.
We studied the hemodynamic effects of ephedrine in patients with or without clonidine premedication during either isoflurane or propofol anesthesia. Forty adult patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 20 patients received famotidine 20 mg orally (control group) and 20 received clonidine 3 microg/kg and famotidine 20 mg orally (clonidine group). Within each group, 10 patients were then anesthetized with isoflurane and 10 with propofol. Hemodynamic measurements were taken at 1-min intervals for 10 min after a bolus injection of ephedrine 0.1 mg/kg. The magnitude of the maximal pressor response to ephedrine was no different whether patients without clonidine were anesthetized with isoflurane (increase 5+/-7 mm Hg) or propofol (3+/-9 mm Hg); however, this response was greater (P<0.05) with propofol (17+/-6 mm Hg) versus isoflurane (6+/-5 mm Hg) in patients given clonidine. The arterial blood pressure increase in clonidine-premedicated patients with propofol anesthesia was the largest among the four subgroups. The heart rate response to ephedrine was not significant in patients anesthetized with isoflurane and was small but significant in those anesthetized with propofol. The present results, together with previous studies on the effect of ephedrine in patients medicated with clonidine, suggest that the interaction between clonidine and ephedrine is modulated by the anesthetic used. ⋯ We evaluated the pressor response to ephedrine during isoflurane or propofol anesthesia with or without clonidine premedication. Our study suggests that, in anesthetized patients premedicated with clonidine, decreases in blood pressure may be easier to reverse with ephedrine with some types of anesthesia (e.g., propofol) than with others (e.g., isoflurane).
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1999
Voiding in patients managed with or without ultrasound monitoring of bladder volume after outpatient surgery.
The goal of this study was to determine whether recovery room monitoring of bladder volume would affect patient outcome after ambulatory surgery. Incidence of urinary retention and times to void and to discharge were compared in 161 patients managed with ultrasound bladder monitoring versus 173 controls without bladder monitoring. Urinary retention was diagnosed by clinical means or by ultrasound, confirmed by bladder catheterization. Patients were required to void or were catheterized before discharge. In the control patients without underlying risk factors for retention, median time to void was 95 min, and retention occurred in 0.8%, which was not significantly different from the ultrasound group (80 min and 0%, respectively). After hernia/anal surgery or spinal/epidural anesthesia, voiding was delayed (130 and 213 min), incidence of retention was increased (17% and 13%), and there was a trend toward earlier voiding (168+/-99 vs. 138+/-68 min) with bladder monitoring. We conclude that most patients at low risk of retention void within 3 h of outpatient surgery; their outcome is unaffected by bladder monitoring. After hernia/anal surgery and spinal/ epidural anesthesia, the likelihood of urinary retention is increased, and ultrasound monitoring facilitates deciding whether such patients should be catheterized. ⋯ Incidence of bladder catheterization and urinary retention were compared in patients managed with and without ultrasound monitoring of bladder volume after outpatient surgery. Monitoring did not alter outcome in patients at low risk of retention, but it facilitated determining when to catheterize patients at high risk of retention (hernia/anal surgery, spinal/epidural anesthesia).