Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1999
Clinical TrialA dose-response study of intravenous regional anesthesia with meperidine.
Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) with meperidine in doses > or = 100 mg provides effective postoperative analgesia. However, this technique is associated with excessive opioid-related side effects, which limit its clinical usefulness. The minimal dose of meperidine that is effective for IVRA has yet to be established. We added 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 mg of meperidine to 0.5% lidocaine IVRA for either carpal tunnel or tenolysis surgery. Pain and sedation scores and the incidence of side effects were assessed in the postanesthesia care unit. The duration of analgesia, defined as the time to first request for pain medications, and use of acetaminophen/codeine (T3) tablets were measured. The duration of analgesia increased, in a dose-dependent manner, in the groups that received 0, 10, 20, and 30 mg of meperidine. There was no significant difference in the duration of analgesia for patients receiving > or = 30 mg of meperidine. T3 use was similar in the groups that received 0, 10, and 20 mg of meperidine and in the groups that received 30, 40, and 50 mg. T3 use was significantly lower in the larger dose groups. The incidence of sedation and of all other side effects was significantly higher in the groups that received 30-50 mg of meperidine compared with those that received smaller doses. We conclude that doses of meperidine large enough to produce the most effective postoperative analgesia with IVRA lidocaine causes a significant incidence of side effects, thus limiting its clinical usefulness. ⋯ Meperidine may be a useful addition to 0.5% lidocaine for i.v. regional anesthesia. We showed that 30 mg is the optimal dose of meperidine with respect to postoperative analgesia. However, this dose caused a significant incidence of sedation, dizziness, and postoperative nausea and vomiting.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialUse of remifentanil during anesthetic induction: a comparison with fentanyl in the ambulatory setting.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1999
Perioperative plasma endothelin-1 and Big endothelin-1 concentrations in elderly patients undergoing major surgical procedures.
Plasma concentrations of the vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 (ET-1) increase during acute physiologic stress, but the role of ET-1 in the pathophysiology of stress remains largely undefined. Whether ET-1 mediates thermoregulatory changes in vasomotor tone is unknown. ET-1 and its more stable precursor, Big ET-1, were measured in plasma obtained at several perioperative time points from 95 consecutive elderly patients (mean age 70 +/- 1 yr) randomized to receive either normothermic or hypothermic perioperative care while undergoing major surgical procedures. In the postoperative period, there were no significant changes in plasma ET-1 concentrations, but Big ET-1 concentrations increased considerably (P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in mean ET-1 or Big ET-1 levels in normothermic and hypothermic patients. Preoperative and postoperative ET-1 concentrations were significantly higher in patients with a history of hypertension (P < 0.002) and in those requiring treatment for postoperative hypertension (P < 0.003). Patients with cancer and those undergoing abdominal surgery had significantly higher Big ET-1 concentrations (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.003, respectively). These data support the hypothesis that Big ET-1 is a more sensitive measure of endothelin system activation after major surgery. Premorbid conditions and location and type of surgery influence perioperative ET-1/Big ET-1 concentrations. ⋯ The endothelin response seems to be significantly associated with perioperative hemodynamic aberrations. The endothelin-1 (ET-1) precursor Big ET-1 is a more sensitive measure of the endothelin system activation in response to surgical stress than ET-1 alone. Thermoregulatory vasoconstriction in response to mild perioperative hypothermia occurs independently of the endothelin system.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1999
Tracheal intubation of healthy pediatric patients without muscle relaxant: a survey of technique utilization and perceptions of safety.
We conducted a survey of Society for Pediatric Anesthesia anesthesiologists practicing within the United States to determine the frequency of tracheal intubation of healthy infants and children using an inhaled anesthetic without muscle relaxation (IAWMR). We also examined reasons for the use of this technique. Of all responders who listed their most often used technique for tracheal intubation of healthy infants and children, IAWMR was chosen over intubation with a muscle relaxant by 38.1% and 43.6%, respectively. Anesthesiologists who most often used IAWMR for tracheal intubation of healthy infants and children had over twice the odds (odds ratio [OR] 2.30 for infants, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-4.50; P = 0.015) of classifying their own practice as nonacademic, and one-third the odds (OR 0.34 for infants, 95% CI 0.17-0.68; P = 0.002) of conducting more than half of their cases in a supervisory role. Anesthesiologists who use IAWMR to tracheally intubate healthy pediatric patients most commonly selected as their reasons the lack of need for a muscle relaxant and the desire to avoid both succinylcholine and the excessive duration of nondepolarizing muscle relaxants. ⋯ Inhaled anesthetic without muscle relaxation is the most often used method of intubation for more than one third of Society for Pediatric Anesthesia anesthesiologists when tracheally intubating healthy, fasted pediatric patients undergoing elective procedures. The frequency of this practice seems to be highest in nonacademic practices.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1999
Comparative StudyTrabecular outflow facility and formation rate of aqueous humor during anesthesia with sevoflurane-nitrous oxide or sevoflurane-remifentanil in rabbits.
In the present study, we examined the effect of sevoflurane and remifentanil on intraocular pressure (IOP) and fluid dynamics. Twenty-eight rabbits were anesthetized with halothane, and IOP was measured via a 25-gauge needle in the anterior chamber. Rabbits were then assigned to one of four groups, and halothane was replaced with sevoflurane 1% (n = 7), 2% (n = 7), 3% (n = 7), or 1% + remifentanil 0.65 microg kg(-1) x min(-1) i.v. (n = 7). In all groups, a series of intraocular infusions was made into the anterior chamber, and IOP, trabecular outflow facility, the rate of aqueous humor formation, and intraocular compliance were determined. With sevoflurane only, intraocular compliance decreased (55 +/- 14, 39 +/- 22, 31 +/- 17 nL/mm Hg; P < 0.05) as the concentration of sevoflurane increased. With sevoflurane 1% + remifentanil, intraocular compliance was significantly increased (100.1 +/- 30.5 nL/mm Hg; P < 0.05) compared with sevoflurane 1%, 2%, or 3%. Trabecular outflow facility, rate of aqueous humor formation, and IOP did not differ among groups, and IOP was similar to values obtained during halothane anesthesia. ⋯ The dose-related effects of sevoflurane on intraocular compliance did not produce significant intraocular pressure differences. Adding remifentanil to sevoflurane increased intraocular compliance. Sevoflurane or sevoflurane + remifentanil causes a decrease in intraocular pressure compared with the average of previously reported values in awake rabbits, and the magnitude of the decrease is similar to that previously reported in rabbits anesthetized with ethyl urethane, pentobarbital, or halothane alone or in combination with propofol, cocaine, or lidocaine.