Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAnesthesia for in vitro fertilization: the addition of fentanyl to 1.5% lidocaine.
Ultrasonically guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval is relatively short procedure that is performed on an out-patient basis. The optimal anesthetic technique should allow good surgical anesthesia with minimal side effects, a short recovery time, and, if possible, a high rate of successful pregnancy. Spinal anesthesia is often used in this institution, as well as many others, for this procedure. The addition of fentanyl may be effective for both intraoperative and postoperative pain relief. We assessed the effect of adding fentanyl to 1.5% lidocaine in women undergoing ultrasonically guided oocyte retrieval. Seventy-eight women were randomized to receive 45 mg of hyperbaric 1.5% lidocaine with or without 10 microg of fentanyl. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were lower in the operating room (OR) (P < 0.05) and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) (P < 0.0005) for the group that received fentanyl. In addition, the amount of narcotic required in the PACU was less in the fentanyl group (P < 0.005). There was no difference in VAS scores the evening of or 24 h after the procedure. The amount of analgesics and narcotics required after discharge was the same for both groups. Timed variables, such as time to urination, ambulation, and discharge, were the same for both groups of women. The addition of fentanyl to lidocaine for transvaginal oocyte retrieval results in a more comfortable patient in the OR and PACU. ⋯ This study demonstrates that when fentanyl is added to a local anesthetic, lidocaine, with spinal anesthesia for egg retrieval procedures, patients are more comfortable during the procedure compared with those who receive lidocaine alone. In addition, the narcotic requirements of patients are less in the postanesthesia care unit.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1999
Minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration of volatile anesthetics in normal and cardiomyopathic hamsters.
Minimum alveolar anesthetic concentrations (MAC) values of volatile anesthetics in cardiovascular diseases remain unknown. We determined MAC values of volatile anesthetics in spontaneously breathing normal and cardiomyopathic hamsters exposed to increasing (0.1%-0.3% steps) concentrations of halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, or desflurane (n = 30 in each group) using the tail-clamp technique. MAC values and their 95% confidence interval were calculated using logistic regression. In normal hamsters, inspired MAC values were: halothane 1.15% (1.10%-1.20%), isoflurane 1.62% (1.54%-1.69%), sevoflurane 2.31% (2.22%-2.40%), and desflurane 7.48% (7.30%-7.67%). In cardiomyopathic hamsters, they were: halothane 0.89% (0.83%-0.95%), isoflurane 1.39% (1.30%-1.47%), sevoflurane 2.00% (1.85%-2.15%), and desflurane 6.97% (6.77%-7.17%). Thus, MAC values of halothane, isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane were reduced by 23% (P < 0.05), 14% (P < 0.05), 13% (P < 0.05), and 7% (P < 0.05), respectively in cardiomyopathic hamsters. ⋯ Minimum alveolar anesthetic concentrations of volatile anesthetics were significantly lower in cardiomyopathic hamsters than in normal hamsters.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1999
The influence of anesthetic choice, PaCO2, and other factors on osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption in rats with brain tumor xenografts.
Increasing the delivery of therapeutic drugs to the brain improves outcome for patients with brain tumors. Osmotic opening of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) can markedly increase drug delivery, but achieving consistent, good quality BBB disruption (BBBD) is essential. We evaluated four experiments compared with our standard isoflurane/O2 protocol to improve the quality and consistency of BBBD and drug delivery to brain tumor and normal brain in a rat model. Success of BBBD was assessed qualitatively with the large molecular weight marker Evans blue albumin and quantitatively by measuring delivery of the low molecular weight marker [3H]-methotrexate. With isoflurane/O2 anesthesia, the effects of two BBBD drugs of different osmolalities were evaluated at two different infusion rates and infusion durations. Arabinose was superior to saline (P = 0.006) in obtaining consistent Evans blue staining in 16 of 24 animals, and it significantly increased [3H]-methotrexate delivery compared with saline in the tumor (0.388 +/- 0.03 vs 0.135 +/-0.04; P = 0.0001), brain around the tumor (0.269 +/- 0.03 vs 0.035 +/- 0.03; P = 0.0001), brain distant to the tumor (0.445 +/- 0.05 vs 0.034 +/- 0.07; P = 0.001), and opposite hemisphere (0.024 +/- 0.00 vs 0.016 +/- 0.00; P = 0.0452). Forty seconds was better than 30 s (P = 0.0372) for drug delivery to the tumor. Under isoflurane/O2 anesthesia (n = 30), maintaining hypocarbia was better than hypercarbia (P = 0.025) for attaining good BBBD. A propofol/ N2O regimen was compared with the isoflurane/O2 regimen, altering blood pressure, heart rate, and PaCO2 as covariates (n = 48). Propofol/N2O was superior to isoflurane/O2 by both qualitative and quantitative measures (P < 0.0001). Neurotoxicity and neuropathology with the propofol/N2O regimen was evaluated, and none was found. These data support the use of propofol/N2O along with maintaining hypocarbia to optimize BBBD in animals with tumors. ⋯ Propofol/N2O anesthesia may be better than isoflurane/O2 for optimizing osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption for delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs to brain tumor and normal brain.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialRemifentanil administration during monitored anesthesia care: are intermittent boluses an effective alternative to a continuous infusion?
This randomized, double-blind study was designed to evaluate the analgesic effectiveness and respiratory stability of remifentanil when administered as intermittent bolus injections, a variable-rate infusion, or a combination of a constant basal infusion supplemented with intermittent boluses during monitored anesthesia care (MAC). Forty-five patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) procedures were randomly assigned to one of the three modes of remifentanil administration. All patients received midazolam 2 mg i.v., followed by a propofol infusion at 50 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1). Two minutes before administering a series of test shock waves: Group I received a remifentanil infusion of 0.1 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), and a saline bolus (5 mL); Group II received a saline infusion and a remifentanil bolus (25 microg in 5 mL); and Group III received a remifentanil infusion of 0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1), and a remifentanil bolus (12.5 microg in 5 mL). The average pain intensity was scored on an 11-point scale, with 0 = no pain to 10 = severe pain. During the ESWL procedure, pain was treated by increasing the study drug infusion rate by 25%-50% and administering 5-mL bolus injections of the study medication in Groups I (saline) and II (remifentanil 25 microg). In Group III, intermittent 5-mL boluses (remifentanil 12.5 microg) were administered as needed. Patients in Groups II and III reported lower pain scores in response to the test shocks. Significantly more remifentanil was administered in Group I (379 +/- 207 microg) than in Group II (201 +/- 136 microg). However, more interventions were required for the treatment of intraoperative pain in the intermittent bolus group (Group II). When remifentanil is administered as the analgesic component of a MAC technique, these data support the use of intermittent bolus doses (12.5-25 microg) alone or in combination with a basal infusion (0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) as alternatives to a variable-rate continuous infusion. ⋯ In this study, three different modes of remifentanil administration were used during monitored anesthesia care for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy procedures. These results suggest that using intermittent bolus injections of remifentanil (25 microg) or a continuous infusion (0.05 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) supplemented with intermittent bolus (12.5 microg) injections may be more effective than a variable-rate infusion of remifentanil during propofol sedation.