Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialConcentration of lidocaine affects intensity of sensory block during lumbar epidural anesthesia.
We investigated the effects of a twofold difference in concentration and volume of lidocaine on lumbar epidural block using a cutaneous current perception threshold (CPT) quantitative sensory testing device. Twenty ASA I patients scheduled for elective gynecological surgery were randomly divided into two equal groups to receive either 20 mL of 1% lidocaine or 10 mL of 2% lidocaine through an epidural catheter inserted at the L1-2 interspace. CPTs at 2000-, 250-, and 5-Hz stimulation and sensation to light touch, temperature, and pinprick at ipsilateral dermatomes V, T9, and L2 were measured before and every 5 min until 60 min after the epidural lidocaine. Epidural anesthesia with both solutions produced a significant increase in all CPTs at dermatomes T9 and L2. Alterations in CPTs were similar for both groups at T9 but were significantly greater in patients given 2% lidocaine than in those given 1% lidocaine at L2. There were no differences in the upper level of sensory block to cold, pinprick, and touch between the two groups. We conclude that lumbar epidural anesthesia with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine produces more intense blockade of both large- and small-diameter sensory nerve fibers than that with 20 mL of 1% lidocaine. ⋯ The effects of local anesthetic concentration and volume on the quality of epidural anesthesia have not been adequately investigated. The results of the present study suggest that the concentration affects the intensity of sensory block during epidural anesthesia with lidocaine.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 1999
Clinical TrialCapnography monitoring during neurosurgery: reliability in relation to various intraoperative positions.
In neurosurgery, estimation of PaCO2 from PETCO2 has been questioned. The aim of this study was to reevaluate the accuracy of PETCO2 in estimating PaCO2 during neurosurgical procedures lasting >3 h and to measure the effect of surgical positioning on arterial to end-tidal CO2 gradient (P[a-ET]CO2) over time. One hundred four neurosurgical patients classified into four groups (supine [SP], lateral [LT], prone [PR], sitting [ST]) were included in a prospective study. PaCO2, PETCO2, and P(a-ET)CO2 were measured after induction of anesthesia (T0), after positioning (T1), each following hour (T2, T3, T4), and at the end of the procedure after return to the SP position (T5). Data are expressed as the mean +/- SD, and statistical analysis used linear regression, the Bland-Altman method, and analysis of variance. The mean durations of positioning and surgery were 4.1+/-1 h and 3.7+/-1.3 h, respectively. We performed 624 simultaneous measurements of PaCO2 (33+/-5 mm Hg) and PETCO2 (27+/-4 mm Hg), leading to a mean P(a-ET)CO2 of 6+/-4 mm Hg. P(a-ET)CO2 of the LT group (7+/-3 mm Hg) was larger (compared with the SP, PR, and ST groups) because of a lower PETCO2 (26+/-4 mm Hg). Negative P(a-ET)CO2 (PETCO2 > PaCO2) occurred 22 times, only in the SP (n = 9) and ST groups (n = 13). Changes in opposite directions of PETCO2 and PaCO2 between two successive measurements were found in 26% of the cases. Correlation coefficients in the four groups (PaCO2 versus PETCO2) were not in good agreement (0.46 to 0.62; P < 0.001). The mean bias was between 5 and 7 mm Hg. The superior (13-15 mm Hg) and inferior (-5 to 0 mm Hg) limits of agreement were too large to expect PETCO2 to replace PaCO2. In conclusion, during neurosurgical procedures of >3 h, capnography should be performed with regular analysis of arterial blood gases for optimal ventilator adjustment. ⋯ This study, which aimed to reevaluate the ability of PETCO2 to estimate PaCO2 during neurosurgical procedures according to surgical position, indicates that PETCO2 cannot replace PaCO2 for the following reasons: scattering of individual values; occurrence of negative arterial to end-tidal CO2 gradient (P[a-ET]CO2; PaCO2 and PETCO2 variations in opposite directions; large changes in P(a-ET)CO2 between two samples; and instability of P(a-ET)CO2 over time.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 1999
Anesthesia for cesarean section and acid aspiration prophylaxis: a German survey.
We surveyed routine anesthetic practice and measures to prevent acid aspiration syndrome (AAS) in patients undergoing cesarean section (CS) throughout Germany. Of 1061 questionnaires, 81.9% were returned. For scheduled CS, general anesthesia was used in 63% of cases, and for urgent CS, it was used in 82% of cases. Regional anesthesia was used less often for both scheduled and urgent CS in smaller (< or =500 deliveries/yr; 28% and 16%, respectively) than in medium-sized (500-1000 deliveries/yr; 42% and 19%, respectively) or major obstetric departments (>1000 deliveries/yr; 45% and 21%, respectively). Among the regional techniques, epidural anesthesia (59%) was preferred more than spinal anesthesia (40%) in scheduled CS. In urgent CS, spinal anesthesia predominated (56% vs 42%). Pharmacological AAS prophylaxis is routinely used in 69% (68%) of departments before elective (urgent) CS under general anesthesia and in 52% under regional anesthesia. H2-blocking drugs are preferred for AAS prophylaxis over H2-blocker plus sodium citrate and sodium citrate alone. Both the incidence of and the mortality from AAS at CS are very low in Germany (<1 fatality per year). Nevertheless, AAS prophylaxis deserves more widespread use in obstetric anesthesia and in other patients at risk (e.g., children, outpatients). ⋯ According to a countrywide survey, the use of regional anesthesia for cesarean section and pharmacological prophylaxis of acid aspiration syndrome is considerably less common in Germany than in the United States, United Kingdom, or other European countries.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 1999
Clinical TrialCommon peroneal nerve stimulation for neuromuscular monitoring: evaluation in awake volunteers and anesthetized patients.
The study was conducted in two parts. First, evoked responses to common peroneal nerve stimulation at four electrode positions were tested in 25 awake volunteers. The initial threshold stimulus current (ITS) (minimal current producing dorsiflexion or eversion of the ankle joint and great toe) and the supramaximal stimulus current (SMS) (the point at which further increases in current did not produce increases in twitch tension) were defined. SMS was not reliably achieved using electrodes at each side of the fibular head. However, an exploratory electrode accurately located the nerve and enabled SMS in all volunteers (SMS/ITS = 3.4). Second, 16 anesthetized, paralyzed patients were studied. The common peroneal and ulnar nerves were stimulated simultaneously. Evoked tension was recorded at the adductor pollicis using a force transducer and at the great toe by a blinded observer. Reversal was given when the train-of-four count at the great toe reached four. Onset times were longer, and median posttetanic counts were greater, at the great toe compared with the adductor pollicis. Time from reversal to train-of-four ratio = 0.7 at the adductor pollicis was 207+/-160 s. We conclude that neuromuscular monitoring at the common peroneal nerve was not equivalent to monitoring at the ulnar nerve. ⋯ Accurate neuromuscular monitoring is important for patient safety. We studied the accuracy of monitoring at the common peroneal nerve in volunteers and patients. An exploratory electrode accurately located the common peroneal nerve. Monitoring at the common peroneal nerve was not equivalent to monitoring at the ulnar nerve in patients.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 1999
The effects of ketamine and propofol on neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and P2x purinoceptors in PC12 cells.
We studied the effects of ketamine and propofol on two ligand-gated ion channels mediating fast synaptic transmission through sympathetic ganglia, neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAchRs), and P2X purinoceptors in a rat pheochromocytoma cell line PC12 using whole cell voltage clamp recording. Ketamine and propofol similarly inhibited the nicotine-induced inward current reversibly and dose-dependently at the membrane potential of -60 mV but had no effects on the adenosine triphosphate-induced current. Both anesthetics accelerated the current decay during agonist application, resulting in greater inhibition on the steady current than the peak current. The 50% inhibition concentration values for the steady current were lower than the clinically relevant concentrations for ketamine (2.8+/-0.6 microM) and higher than those for propofol (5.4+/-0.6 microM). Both anesthetics induced an addition of the fast component to the decay phase and an acceleration of the slow component, which suggests an open channel blockade or an enhancement of desensitization as a mechanism. The effects on closed channels seemed to be small because preincubation with the anesthetics did not significantly augment the block. Inhibition was voltage-independent at membrane potentials between -20 and -70 mV and was consistent with a noncompetitive block. Inhibition of the neuronal nAchR-mediated current may lead to the suppression of synaptic transmission in sympathetic ganglia by ketamine, but not by propofol, at the clinically relevant concentrations. However, these results are not consistent with changes in sympathetic nerve activities reported for animals or humans anesthetized with ketamine or propofol, which suggests effects from other systems, such as the central nervous system in vivo. ⋯ Ketamine (at smaller than clinically relevant concentrations) and propofol (at larger than clinically relevant concentrations) inhibited neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated current in PC12 cells, which possess the receptors that resemble those in postganglionic sympathetic neurons. These findings are not consistent with in vivo experiments, which suggests that effects from other systems, such as the central nervous system, are of importance.