Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1998
The effects of age and gender on the optimal premedication dose of intramuscular midazolam.
We conducted a double-blind study on the effects of age and gender on the optimal premedication dose of i.m. midazolam. We randomly divided 100 male and 100 female patients in each of three age groups: A = 20-39 yr, B = 40-59 yr, and C = 60-79 yr (total 600 patients) into five groups according to midazolam dosage: 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, and 0.12 mg/kg. Midazolam was injected i.m. with atropine 0.01 mg/kg 15 min before the induction of anesthesia. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation (SpO2), sedation level, tongue root depression, eyelash reflex, and anterograde amnesia were monitored. There were no significant differences between male and female patients in any variables in any age. Decrease of SpO2 and loss of eyelash reflex were seen with midazolam 0.10 mg/kg in Group A, and with 0.08 mg/kg in Group B. In Group C, decreases in BP and SpO2, loss of eyelash reflex, and depression of the tongue root were observed with midazolam 0.06 mg/kg. In conclusion, the optimal doses of i.m. midazolam administered 15 min before the induction of anesthesia in male or female patients were 0.08, 0.06, and 0.04 mg/kg for Groups A, B, and C, respectively. ⋯ Midazolam is the most widely used preoperative anxiolytic drug. Our purpose was to evaluate the optimal dose of i.m. midazolam that would maximize the desired effects and minimize the side effects in a common clinical setting. Results indicate that age, but not gender, should affect the i.m. midazolam dose selected for premedication.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPatient-controlled versus anesthesiologist-controlled conscious sedation with propofol for dental treatment in anxious patients.
In a randomized, cross-over study, we prospectively compared the efficacy and quality of two methods to achieve conscious sedation with propofol in 11 unpremedicated, anxious dental patients. Each patient underwent two dental procedures, one that was conducted under target-controlled infusion (TCI) by the anesthesiologist (ACS), and the other that used patient-controlled sedation (PCS). The initial target concentration in the ACS mode was 2.5 microg/mL, which was manipulated in both directions until the desired clinical end point was achieved. In the PCS mode, a 4-mg bolus of propofol (10 mg/mL) was delivered at each activation of the machine, infused over 7 s without a lockout interval. The anxious dental patients could induce and maintain conscious sedation with the PCS settings. The mean (range) venous blood propofol concentrations were not significantly different with either mode: ACS 1.8 (0.8-2.7) microg/mL and PCS 1.2 (0.2-2.5) microg/mL. The level of patient satisfaction, quality of sedation, and treatability were not different for either mode of sedation. The intensity of amnesia for intraoperative events was related to the blood concentrations achieved. In the ACS mode, one patient became unresponsive (sedation level 4) immediately after the start of sedation. No adverse cardiorespiratory effects resulted from either mode of propofol sedation. Five patients expressed a strong preference for PCS, and three would prefer ACS in the future. The results of the present study suggest that with these PCS settings, a satisfactory level of conscious sedation and a high level of patient satisfaction was achieved. ⋯ In a randomized, cross-over study, the blood propofol concentrations necessary to achieve conscious sedation in anxious dental patients using a target-controlled infusion conducted by the anesthesiologist versus patient-controlled sedation were not different. With the patient-controlled sedation settings, a satisfactory level of conscious sedation and a high level of patient satisfaction were achieved.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1998
Comparative StudyComparison of the three-in-one and fascia iliaca compartment blocks in adults: clinical and radiographic analysis.
The 3-in-1 (Group 1) and fascia iliaca compartment (Group 2) blocks, two single-injection, anterior approach procedures used to simultaneously block the femoral, obturator, and lateral femoral cutaneous (LFC) nerves, were compared in 100 adults after lower limb surgery. Pain control, sensory and motor blockades, and radiographically visualized spread of local anesthetic solution were studied prospectively. Both approaches provided efficient pain control using 30 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 0.5% bupivacaine and 5 mL of contrast media (iopamidol). Complete lumbar plexus blockade was achieved in 18 (38%) Group 1 and 17 (34%) Group 2 patients (n = 50 patients per group). Sensory block of the femoral, obturator, genitofemoral, and LFC nerves was obtained in 90% and 88%, 52% and 38%, 38% and 34%, and 62% and 90% of the patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.05). Sensory LFC blockade was obtained more rapidly for the patients in Group 2 (P < 0.05). Concurrent internal and external spread of the local anesthetic solution under the fascia iliaca and between the iliacus and psoas muscles was noted in 62 of the 92 block procedures analyzed radiographically. Isolated external spreads under the fascia iliaca and over the iliacus muscle were noted in 10% and 36% of the patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P < 0.05). The local anesthetic solution reached the lumbar plexus in only five radiographs. We conclude that the fascia iliaca compartment block is more effective than the 3-in-1 block in producing simultaneous blockade of the LFC and femoral nerves in adults. After both procedures, blockade was obtained primarily by the spread of local anesthetic under the fascia iliaca and only rarely by contact with the lumbar plexus. ⋯ In adults, the two anterior approaches, 3-in-1 and fascia iliaca compartment blocks, provide effective postoperative analgesia. The fascia iliaca compartment technique provides faster and more consistent simultaneous blockade of the lateral femoral cutaneous and femoral nerves. Sensory block is caused by the spread of local anesthetic solution under the fascia iliaca and only rarely to the lumbar plexus.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1998
Tests to evaluate intravenous placement of epidural catheters in laboring women: a prospective clinical study.
We prospectively evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of an epinephrine-containing epidural test dose (EpiTD) as a marker of intravascular injection in 209 unmedicated laboring women. Maternal heart rate (MHR) was continuously monitored and recorded on a strip chart. A tocodynamometer monitored uterine activity. A lumbar epidural catheter was placed and aspirated. If aspiration was positive for blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), the catheter was replaced. In uterine diastole and with stable MHR, 198 patients received an EpiTD (epinephrine 15 microg plus lidocaine 45 mg) via the catheter. MHR and the generated HR strip were observed. A positive EpiTD was defined as a sudden increase in MHR of 10 bpm more than the resting MHR, within one minute after the injection, with a fast acceleratory phase of more than 1 bpm. Absence of a tachycardiac response suggested a negative EpiTD. If the tachycardiac response was deemed equivocal or a uterine contraction followed the EpiTD injection within 1 min, the EpiTD was invalidated and repeated. Catheter aspiration was repeated, and the catheter was removed if aspiration was positive. All patients with negative EpiTD and aspiration received 6-12 mL of epidural bupivacaine 0.25% with or without fentanyl 50 microg. Absence of analgesia without signs or symptoms of systemic toxicity after a maximum of bupivacaine 30 mg defined failed epidural analgesia. All patients with positive EpiTD and negative aspiration received 5 mL of lidocaine 2% epidurally as a second test dose (Lido100TD). The presence of tinnitus and/or metallic taste defined a positive Lido100TD. There were 176 true negatives, 0 false negatives, 14 true positives, and 8 false positives. The sensitivity of EpiTD was 100%, the specificity 96%, the negative predictive value 100%, and the positive predictive value 63%. The prevalence of negative tests was 88%, and the prevalence of positive tests was 12%. The overall accuracy of an EpiTD was 95.5%. We conclude that EpiTD is a reliable test to identify i.v. catheters during the performance of lumbar epidural analgesia in laboring patients. ⋯ Catheters inserted for epidural analgesia in laboring patients may accidentally enter a blood vessel. Local anesthetics injected through these catheters may cause seizures and cardiac arrest. In this study, we concluded that injecting a small amount of epinephrine before injecting a local anesthetic frequently helps to identify these misplaced catheters. Few catheters may actually be in the correct place even after responses to epinephrine.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSmall-dose hyperbaric versus plain bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.
In a double-blind, randomized trial, 98 parturients undergoing cesarean section received either hyperbaric or plain bupivacaine 6.6 mg combined with sufentanil 3.3 microg as part of a combined spinal-epidural procedure. To prevent hypotension, 1000 mL of lactated Ringer's solution, 500 mL of hydroxyethyl starch 6%, and ephedrine 5 mg were administered i.v. The height of the block was equal in both groups, but more patients in the plain group had blocks that were either too high or too low (P < 0.01). The number of patients requiring epidural supplementation was equal in both groups. Strict criteria were used to treat hypotension. The overall incidence of systolic blood pressure (<90 mm Hg) was 13%, whereas it was more pronounced in the plain group (21% vs 6% in the hyperbaric group, P < 0.05), which required more ephedrine (P < 0.05) and in which a greater incidence of nausea was noticed (P < 0.05). We conclude that the use of a small dose of intrathecal bupivacaine combined with sufentanil plus our described preloading regimen resulted in a lower incidence of hypotension. Further, we conclude that the use of hyperbaric bupivacaine in this manner provides a more reliable block and a lower incidence of hypotension than plain bupivacaine. ⋯ A small dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% combined with sufentanil used intrathecally during cesarean section offered a more reliable cephalad spread of the spinal block than the glucose-free combination, which was reflected in a lower incidence of hypotension and nausea.