Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1998
Comparative StudyIsoflurane and pentobarbital reduce the frequency of transient ischemic depolarizations during focal ischemia in rats.
Repetitive transient ischemic depolarizations (IDs) during focal cerebral ischemia are thought to contribute to ischemic damage. Isoflurane and pentobarbital reduce injury (versus the nonanesthetized state) after focal cerebral ischemia. The mechanism by which these drugs reduce injury is not known. This protective effect might be mediated by a reduction in the number of IDs. We measured the frequency of IDs during focal cerebral ischemia in animals anesthetized with isoflurane or pentobarbital and compared it with that in N2O/fentanyl anesthetized animals and in animals in which the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist MK801 (dizocilpine) was given. Focal cerebral ischemia was induced by the occlusion of the middle cerebral artery for a period of 2 h. Cortical infarct volumes were determined after 3 h of reperfusion by image analysis of 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium-stained coronal brain sections. The infarct volume was significantly greater in the N2O/fentanyl group than in the other three groups. Infarct volumes in the isoflurane, pentobarbital, and MK801 groups were similar. The frequency of IDs was significantly greater in the N2O/fentanyl group than in the other three groups, and was the least in the MK801 group. There was a direct correlation between the number of IDs and the volume of tissue injury. The data indicate that the protective effect of isoflurane and pentobarbital might, in part, be determined by their ability to reduce IDs during focal ischemia. However, the observation that the infarct volume was similar in the MK801, isoflurane, and pentobarbital groups, despite a greater frequency of IDs in the latter two groups, suggests that mechanisms other than a simple reduction in the number of IDs probably also play a role in anesthetic-mediated cerebral protection. ⋯ Transient ischemic depolarizations during focal ischemia contribute to brain injury. Both isoflurane and pentobarbital reduced the frequency of these depolarizations. Isoflurane- and pentobarbital-mediated reduction in the frequency of depolarizations might, in part, mediate the previously documented neuroprotective effect of these drugs.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1998
The dose-response relationship of ketorolac as a component of intravenous regional anesthesia with lidocaine.
Ketorolac (K) is a useful addition to lidocaine for i.v. regional anesthesia (IVRA). However, the minimal dose of K that is effective for this purpose has not been established. We added 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 60 mg of K to 0.5% lidocaine IVRA for either carpal tunnel release or tenolysis. Pain was assessed in the postanesthesia care unit by using a visual analog scale. The duration of analgesia (time to first request for pain relief) and the use of Tylenol No. 3 tablets (T3) were measured. A linear dose-response relationship was observed between the dose of K and the duration of analgesia (r = 0.988) up to 20 mg of K. Similarly, the number of T3 tablets used was inversely related to the dose of K (r = 0.960) over the same range. There were no significant differences among the groups who received 20, 30, or 60 mg of K. We conclude that 20 mg of K is the optimal dose for inclusion with 0.5% lidocaine for IVRA under the conditions of our study. ⋯ The antiinflammatory drug ketorolac is a useful addition to lidocaine for i.v. regional anesthesia. This study showed that 20 mg of ketorolac is equally effective as 60 mg in this context. However, smaller doses provided less effective pain relief, and a linear dose-response relationship was demonstrated.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1998
Comparative StudySuccessful strategies for improving operating room efficiency at academic institutions.
In this prospective study, we evaluated the etiology of operating room (OR) delays in an academic institution, examined the impact of multidisciplinary strategies to improve OR efficiency, and established OR timing benchmarks for use in future OR efficiency studies. OR times and delay etiologies were collected for 94 cases during the initial phase of the study. Timing data and delay etiologies were analyzed, and 2 wk of multidisciplinary OR efficiency awareness education was conducted for the nursing, surgical, and anesthesia staff. After the education period, timing data were collected from 1787 cases, and monthly reports listing individual case delays and timing data were sent to the Chiefs of Service. For the first case of the day, patient in room, anesthesia ready, surgical preparation start, and procedure start time were significantly earlier (P < 0.01) in the posteducation period compared with the preeducation period, and the procedure start time for the first case of the day occurred, on average, 22 min earlier than all other procedures. For all cases combined, turnover time decreased, on average, by 16 min. Unavailability of surgeons, anesthesiologists, and residents decreased significantly (P < 0.05) as causes of OR delays. Anesthesia induction times were consistently longer for the vascular and cardiothoracic services, whereas surgical preparation time was increased for the neurosurgical and orthopedic services (P < 0.05). Identification of the etiology of OR inefficiency, combined with multidisciplinary awareness training and personal accountability, can improve OR efficiency. The time savings realized are probably most cost-effective when combined with more flexible OR staffing and improved OR scheduling. ⋯ We achieved significant improvements in operating room efficiency by analyzing operating room data on causes of delays, devising strategies for minimizing the most common delays, and subsequently measuring delay data. Personal accountability, streamlining of procedures, interdisciplinary team work, and accurate data collection were all important contributors to improved efficiency.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1998
Comparative StudyThe effect of prior dural puncture on cerebrospinal fluid sufentanil concentrations in sheep after the administration of epidural sufentanil.
Sufentanil is a highly lipid soluble opioid that provides potent analgesia when administered in the subarachnoid space. Unfortunately, the penetration of sufentanil into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) after epidural administration is poor, and limits its effectiveness for epidural analgesia. Dural puncture may enhance the movement of epidural sufentanil into the subarachnoid space and increase its effectiveness. To determine whether the administration of epidural sufentanil adjacent to a dural puncture results in significantly greater CSF concentrations, 18 adult ewes were studied. Animals in the control group had an epidural catheter placed at the superior border of the pelvis without dural puncture. Animals in the study group had an epidural catheter placed, followed by a dural puncture performed using an 18-gauge Touhy needle. The dural puncture was performed one interspace cephalad to the epidural catheter. One hour after dural puncture, each animal received a loading dose of 0.35 microg/kg of sufentanil (5 microg/mL) through the epidural catheter, followed by an infusion of epidural sufentanil 0.15 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for a period of 4 h. After 4 h, CSF was sampled from a site one interspace caudad to the epidural catheter as well as at the cisterna magna. The mean CSF concentration of sufentanil at the level of the pelvis for animals with a dural puncture was 12.1 +/- 3.0 ng/mL compared with 1.8 ng/mL in controls with intact dura. Sufentanil concentrations at the cisterna magna were below the level of detection (0.08 ng/mL) for all animals in both groups. We conclude that an 18-gauge dural puncture significantly increases movement of sufentanil from the epidural to the intrathecal space. This increase in sufentanil concentration at the level of the pelvis was not associated with detectable levels of sufentanil at the brainstem. ⋯ This study addresses the effect of dural puncture on spinal fluid concentrations of sufentanil after epidural administration. A sheep model was used to measure drug concentrations in the spinal fluid at the levels of the pelvis and brainstem after epidural administration. Dural puncture significantly enhanced movement of sufentanil into the spinal fluid at the level of the pelvis, but brainstem concentrations were below the level of detection. Analgesic concentrations of spinal sufentanil in the clinical setting, as well as brainstem concentrations associated with respiratory depression, have yet to be defined.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1998
Comment Letter Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialDose-response function of epidural fentanyl versus sufentanil.