Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAlkalinization of lidocaine does not hasten the onset of axillary brachial plexus block.
We assessed the onset of sensory and motor blockade as well as the distribution of sensory blockade after axillary brachial plexus block with 1.5% lidocaine hydrochloride 1:200,000 epinephrine with and without sodium bicarbonate in 38 patients. The onset of analgesia and anesthesia was recorded over the distributions of the median, ulnar, radial, and medial cutaneous nerves of the forearm, medial cutaneous and lateral cutaneous nerves of the arm, and musculocutaneous nerve. The onset of motor blockade of elbow and wrist movements was also recorded. Data were analyzed by using survival techniques and compared by using log rank tests. Only the onset of analgesia in the medial cutaneous nerves of the arm and forearm, and the onset of anesthesia in the medial cutaneous nerve of the arm were significantly faster (P < 0.05) with alkalinization of lidocaine. Our study showed that alkalinization of lidocaine does not significantly hasten block onset in most terminal nerve distributions. ⋯ We examined whether alkalinizing a local anesthetic would quicken the onset of a regional upper limb nerve blockade. We found that alkalinization of lidocaine did not offer a significant clinical advantage in axillary brachial plexus blockade.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAlfentanil as an adjuvant to epidural bupivacaine in the management of postoperative pain after laparotomies: lack of evidence of spinal action.
In this double-blind study, we compared the efficacy of epidural versus i.v. administration of alfentanil in combination with small-dose bupivacaine for postoperative pain relief. Thirty-two patients were randomly allocated to one of two study groups. Patients from both groups received an epidural loading dose of 60 mg of bupivacaine (12 mL of 0.5%). Subsequently, patients in the epidural (EPI) group received an infusion (8 mL/h) of 0.125% bupivacaine (10 mg/h) plus alfentanil (0.36 mg/h) and an i.v. infusion (8 mL/h) of NaCl 0.9%. Patients in the i.v. group received an epidural infusion (8 mL/h) of 0.125% bupivacaine (10 mg/h) and an i.v. infusion (8 mL/h) of alfentanil (0.36 mg/h). Infusions were maintained for 24 h. These dose regimens were such that equivalent subanalgesic plasma concentrations of alfentanil were obtained. Patient-controlled analgesia with morphine was available to both groups. Time to onset of postoperative pain and morphine consumption were used as variables to compare the two regimens. Measured plasma concentrations of alfentanil during the postoperative observation period were similar (< 20 ng/mL) in both groups. Median times to onset of postoperative pain (EPI 600 min, i.v. 360 min) and total morphine consumption (EPI 11 mg, i.v. 10 mg) did not differ between the groups (P > 0.2). We conclude that, in combination with epidural bupivacaine 0.125%, an i.v. infusion of alfentanil is equally effective as an epidural infusion of alfentanil if the plasma concentrations are the same. The study did not demonstrate a spinal mechanism of action for alfentanil. ⋯ This randomized, double-blind study showed that, when combined with small-dose bupivacaine (0.125%), epidurally administered alfentanil is not more effective than i.v. administered alfentanil for postoperative pain management when the regimens are such that equivalent subanalgesic plasma alfentanil concentrations are obtained. A spinal mechanism of action for alfentanil could therefore not be demonstrated.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialProphylactic ephedrine attenuates the hemodynamic response to propofol in elderly female patients.
In this study, we compared the effect of prophylactic administration of ephedrine against the hypotensive effect of propofol in elderly female patients scheduled for minor gynecological procedures. Ninety patients aged 60 yr or older were randomly allocated to one of three groups of 30 patients each to receive either normal saline, ephedrine 0.1 mg/kg, or ephedrine 0.2 mg/kg i.v. 1 min before the induction of anesthesia. Anesthesia was induced and maintained with propofol and fentanyl. Hemodynamic variables were measured before and 2, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60 min after induction. The decrease in blood pressure and heart rate (HR) was significantly less in each of the ephedrine groups (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the decrease was less in the large-dose group compared with the small-dose group (P < 0.05). Twelve patients in the control group experienced a decrease in systolic blood pressure to < 80 mmHg, compared with only one patient in the ephedrine groups (P < 0.001). In conclusion, the prophylactic injection of ephedrine significantly attenuated, but did not completely abolish, the decrease in blood pressure associated with induction of anesthesia with fentanyl and propofol. Ephedrine 0.2 mg/kg was slightly more effective than ephedrine 0.1 mg/kg. ⋯ The prophylactic effect of ephedrine to counteract the hypotensive effect of propofol induction of anesthesia was investigated in three groups of elderly female patients given 0.1 or 0.2 mg of ephedrine or placebo before induction. Both ephedrine doses markedly attenuated, but neither of them abolished, the decrease in blood pressure.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialAn in vivo evaluation of four spinal needles used for the combined spinal-epidural technique.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate four pencil-point spinal needles commonly used for combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia. Four hundred-seven consecutive parturients undergoing cesarean delivery or labor analgesia received a CSE block with a randomly selected pencil-point spinal needle (Becton-Dickinson [B-D] 27-gauge, 119-mm Whitacre; B-D 27-gauge, 120-mm Durasafe; B-D 25-gauge, 120-mm Durasafe; or International Medical Devices' 26-gauge, 124-mm Gertie Marx). Success in obtaining cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the incidence of transient paresthesias and postdural puncture headache (PDPH) were compared by using chi2 testing; P < 0.05 was considered significant. Failure to obtain CSF (3%-5%) was not significantly different among spinal needles. The Gertie Marx 26-gauge needle was associated with significantly more paresthesias (29%) than the Whitacre 27-gauge needle (17%). The combined incidence of paresthesias with the Durasafe 25-gauge and Gertie Marx 26-gauge spinal needles (28%) was greater than the combined incidence of paresthesias with the Durasafe 27-gauge and Whitacre 27-gauge needles (18%). The incidence of PDPH did not differ among the four pencil-point spinal needles. We conclude that longer spinal needles are associated with a significantly more frequent incidence of transient paresthesias without residual effects. ⋯ The use of four pencil-point spinal needles in the combined spinal-epidural technique is associated with an inconsequential incidence of spinal headache, a low incidence of paresthesias that are transient with no long-term effects, and a high degree of success independent of spinal needle length.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialDroperidol and the side effects of epidural morphine after cesarean section.
Epidural morphine produces analgesia with a high incidence of side effects that include pruritus, nausea, and vomiting. This study investigated whether epidural or i.v. droperidol could alleviate these symptoms. In a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, 97 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section were randomly assigned to three groups. All received standard continuous epidural anesthesia. After delivery, each received 5 mg of epidural morphine with either no droperidol injection, 2.5 mg of epidural droperidol, or 2.5 mg of i.v. droperidol. The incidence, onset, duration, and severity of pruritus; the onset and severity of pain; and satisfaction were similar for each group, but the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting was lower in the group that received i.v. droperidol (P < 0.01). Sedation was minimal throughout the study. Thus, epidural droperidol failed to alleviate the side effects caused by epidural morphine, but i.v.droperidol reduced both the incidence and severity of nausea and vomiting. These results suggest that droperidol acts systemically to counter the effects of epidural morphine but that it is not entirely effective. ⋯ A single dose of epidural morphine provides long-lasting pain relief for women who have undergone cesarean section, but it has some troublesome side effects (itching, nausea, vomiting). We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in 97 such women to study whether droperidol could reduce these side effects. We found that i.v. droperidol reduced nausea and vomiting but did not prevent itching, and that epidural droperidol failed to prevent all side effects.