Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of needle gauge and lidocaine pH on pain during intradermal injection.
Local anesthetics can produce pain during skin infiltration. We designed a randomized, prospective trial to determine whether needle gauge and/or solution pH affect pain during the intradermal infiltration of lidocaine. After approval by our institution's human studies review board, 40 healthy adult volunteers gave their consent to participate in this study. All of the volunteers randomly received four intradermal injections. Each volunteer was blinded as to the content of the intradermal injections and to which needle size was used for each injection. Each volunteer randomly received a 0.25-mL intradermal injection of the following four solutions: 1) lidocaine 2% administered through a 25-gauge needle (lido-25); 2) lidocaine 2% mixed with sodium bicarbonate (4 mL of 2% lidocaine plus 1 mL of sodium bicarbonate, pH 7.26) administered through a 25-gauge needle (lido-bicarb-25); 3) lidocaine 2% administered through a 30-gauge needle (lido-30); and 4) lidocaine 2% mixed with sodium bicarbonate (4 mL of 2% lidocaine plus 1 mL of sodium bicarbonate) administered through a 30-gauge needle (lido-bicarb-30). In each patient, the injection site was in the same region for each of the four injections. The skin wheal was tested for appropriate anesthesia using a 19-gauge needle on the skin wheal. A visual analog pain score was recorded after each intradermal injection. The pain scores were significantly higher in the lido-25 (3.2 +/- 0.2) group than in the lido-30 (2.5 +/- 0.3), lido-bicarb-25 (1.9 +/- 0.2), and lido-bicarb-30 (1.3 +/- 0.2) groups. The lido-bicarb-30 injection was also rated as less painful than the lido-30 injection. We found no differences between the lidobicarb-25 and the lido-bicarb-30 injections. Complete analgesia for the 19-gauge needle pain stimulus was achieved in all patients for each injection. We conclude that, overall, the pain intensity of an intradermal injection of 2% lidocaine is low. The addition of sodium bicarbonate to 2% lidocaine decreases the pain associated with an intradermal skin wheal, and although the use of a 30-gauge needle decreases the pain of injection, the addition of sodium bicarbonate seems to have a greater overall effect than needle size. ⋯ Forty volunteers randomly received four intradermal injections consisting of 2% lidocaine with or without sodium bicarbonate via a 25- or 30-gauge needle. The addition of bicarbonate had a greater overall effect than needle size in decreasing the pain associated with the intradermal injection of lidocaine.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialSubhypnotic doses of propofol do not relieve pruritus induced by intrathecal morphine after cesarean section.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether subhypnotic doses of propofol effectively relieve pruritus in women who received intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery. Twenty-nine women who developed pruritus after undergoing an elective cesarean section and receiving intrathecal morphine (0.25 mg) for postoperative analgesia were enrolled in this randomized, prospective, double-blind study. The women were randomly assigned to receive either 1 mL of propofol (n = 17) or 1 mL of placebo (n = 12) I.V. Pruritus was evaluated 5 min after treatment. In the absence of successful treatment, the women received another 1 mL of the same drug. Pruritus was again evaluated 5 min after the second dose. We found that pruritus was successfully treated twice in the propofol group and once in the placebo group (P = not significant). The antipruritic action of propofol lasted for up to 6 h in one woman and 15 min in the other. The one success in the placebo group lasted for 15 min. We conclude that the success rate of propofol in treating pruritus in women who received intrathecal morphine for postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery is not significantly different from that of placebo. ⋯ Pruritus is a common and bothersome side effect of neuraxial opioids after cesarean section. Subhypnotic doses of I.V. propofol (10 mg) have been used to treat pruritus caused by neuraxial opioids. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we found that propofol does not relieve pruritus in women who underwent cesarean section and received intrathecal morphine sulfate (0.25 mg) for postoperative pain relief.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialIntraarticular morphine in the multimodal analgesic management of postoperative pain after ambulatory anterior cruciate ligament repair.
Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is associated with a considerable degree of postoperative pain. Our customary multimodal approach to postoperative analgesia after ambulatory ACL surgery includes perioperative nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, pre- and postincisional intraarticular (I.A.) bupivacaine (B), and postoperative cryotherapy using an external cooling system. This study was designed to determine whether the addition of I.A. morphine (MS) provides improved postoperative analgesia. One hundred patients scheduled for elective ambulatory ACL repair received our standard multimodal therapy. After surgery, patients were randomized to one of four study groups. Group 1 received 30 mL of 0.25% B I.A. Group 2 received 30 mL of normal saline I.A. and 5 mg of MS I.A. Group 3 received 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine I.A. and 5 mg of MS I.V.. Group 4 received 30 mL of 0.25% B I.A. and 5 mg of MS I.A. The addition of I.A. B postoperatively provided prolonged analgesia and decreased postoperative pain and analgesic requirements. The addition of MS to I.A. B did not provide additional postoperative analgesia. We conclude that patients undergoing ambulatory ACL repair using our standard multimodal analgesic regimen failed to receive additional postoperative analgesia when MS was added to the I.A. B. ⋯ Patients receiving a multimodal analgesic regimen of perioperative nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, intraarticular bupivacaine, and external cooling did not receive any additional analgesia from intraarticular morphine.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of timing of ondansetron administration on its efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit as a prophylactic antiemetic in the ambulatory setting.
Although ondansetron (4 mg I.V.) is effective in the prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after ambulatory surgery, the optimal timing of its administration, the cost-effectiveness, the cost-benefits, and the effect on the patient's quality of life after discharge have not been established. In this placebo-controlled, double-blind study, 164 healthy women undergoing outpatient gynecological laparoscopic procedures with a standardized anesthetic were randomized to receive placebo (Group A), ondansetron 2 mg at the start of and 2 mg after surgery (Group B), ondansetron 4 mg before induction (Group C), or ondansetron 4 mg after surgery (Group D). The effects of these regimens on the incidence, severity, and costs associated with PONV and discharge characteristics were determined, along with the patient's willingness to pay for antiemetics. Compared with ondansetron given before induction of anesthesia, the administration of ondansetron after surgery was associated with lower nausea scores, earlier intake of normal food, decreased incidence of frequent emesis (more than two episodes), and increased times until 25% of patients failed prophylactic antiemetic therapy (i.e., had an emetic episode or received rescue antiemetics for severe nausea) during the first 24 h postoperatively. This prophylactic regimen was also associated with the highest patient satisfaction and lowest cost-effectiveness ratios. Compared with the placebo group, ondansetron administered after surgery significantly reduced the incidence of PONV in the postanesthesia care unit and during the 24-h follow-up period and facilitated the recovery process by reducing the time to oral intake, ambulation, discharge readiness, resuming regular fluid intake and a normal diet. When ondansetron was given as a "split dose," its prophylactic antiemetic efficacy was not significantly different from that of the placebo group. In conclusion, the prophylactic administration of ondansetron after surgery, rather than before induction, may be associated with increased patient benefits. ⋯ Ondansetron 4 mg I.V. administered immediately before the end of surgery was the most efficacious in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting, facilitating both early and late recovery, and improving patient satisfaction after outpatient laparoscopy.