Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1997
Comparative StudyThe Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale: how does it compare with a "gold standard"?
Evaluating the effectiveness of interventions directed toward the treatment of preoperative anxiety in children has been hindered by the absence of a statistically valid measurement tool. In a previous investigation, we developed an instrument (Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale [YPAS]) that can be used to assess anxiety in children undergoing induction of anesthesia. The purpose of the present investigation was to modify and expand the applicability of the instrument to the preoperative holding area and to validate the modified instrument (m-YPAS) against a recognized "gold standard" (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Childrens [STAIC]). Videotapes of children in a preoperative holding area were analyzed by the investigators. The existing five categories of the YPAS were found to reflect most of the behaviors observed. Several items, however, were modified to describe new behaviors observed. Reliability analysis using weighted kappa statistics revealed that inter-observer agreement ranged from 0.68 to 0.86, whereas intraobserver weighted kappa ranged from 0.63 to 0.90. Concurrent validity between the YPAS and the STAIC was acceptable (P = 0.01, r = 0.79). Construct validity was high as assessed by increased m-YPAS scores from the preoperative holding area (28 +/- 8) to entering the operating room (35 +/- 12), to introduction of the anesthesia mask (43 +/- 15;F [1,36] = 0.6, P = 0.001]. Showing good to excellent observer reliability and high concurrent and construct validity, the m-YPAS proved to be an appropriate tool for assessing children's anxiety during the perioperative period. ⋯ The absence of a statistically valid measurement tool that can be applied easily in perioperative settings hinders the evaluation of interventions directed toward treatment of preoperative anxiety in children. The authors describe the development of such a tool, the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale.
-
Postoperative pain is a common reason for the delayed discharge and unanticipated hospital admission of out-patients. In this study, we examined the pattern of pain in ambulatory surgical patients and determined those factors that predict postoperative pain. Ten thousand eight consecutive ambulatory surgical patients were prospectively studied. Preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative variables, and pain in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and the ambulatory surgical unit (ASU) and 24 h postoperatively were documented. The incidence of severe pain was 5.3% in the PACU, 1.7% in the ASU, and 5.3% 24 h postoperatively. In the PACU, younger male adults (36 +/- 13 vs 47 +/- 22 yr), ASA physical status I patients, and patients with a higher body mass index (26 +/- 5 vs 25 +/- 5 kg) had a higher incidence of severe pain. In the group with severe pain, the duration of anesthesia, the duration of stay in the PACU and the ASU, and the time to discharge was longer than in the group without severe pain. In the PACU, orthopedic patients had the highest incidence of pain (16.1%), followed by urologic (13.4%), general surgery (11.5%), and plastic surgery (10.0%) patients. In patients who had general anesthesia, the intraoperative dose of fentanyl was significantly smaller in the group with severe pain than in the group without severe pain when body mass index and duration of anesthesia were taken into consideration. Body mass index, duration of anesthesia, and certain types of surgery were significant predictors of severe pain in the PACU. This knowledge will allow us to identify those patients at risk of severe postoperative pain and manage them prophylactically. ⋯ The pattern of pain was examined in 10,008 consecutive ambulatory surgical patients. The incidence of severe pain was 5.3% in the postanesthesia care unit, 1.7% in the ambulatory surgical unit, and 5.3% 24 h postoperatively. Body mass, duration of anesthesia, and certain types of surgery were significant predictors of pain in the postanesthesia care unit. These data will allow us to better predict those patients who need intense prophylactic analgesic therapy.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSplanchnic and renal deterioration during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison of the carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and the abdominal wall lift method.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum together with an increased intraabdominal pressure (IAP) induces a hemodynamic stress response, diminishes urine output, and may compromise splanchnic perfusion. A new retractor method may be less traumatic. Accordingly, 30 ASA physical status I or II patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum (IAP 12-13 mm Hg) (control) or to a gasless abdominal wall lift method (retractor) group. Anesthesia and intravascular fluids were standardized. Direct mean arterial pressure (MAP), urine output, urine-N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (U-NAG), arterial blood gases, gastric mucosal PCO2, and intramucosal pH (pHi) were measured. Normoventilation was instituted in all patients. MAP increased (P < 0.001) only with CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Minute volume of ventilation had to be increased by 35% with CO2 insufflation. PaCO2 was significantly higher (P < 0.05) for 3 h postoperatively in the control group. Diuresis was less (P < 0.01) and U-NAG levels (P < 0.01) higher in the control group. The pHi decreased after induction of pneumoperitoneum up to three hours postoperatively and remained intact in the retractor group. We conclude that the retractor method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy ensures stable hemodynamics, prevents respiratory acidosis, and provides protection against biochemical effects, which reveal the renal and splanchic ischemia caused by CO2 insufflation. ⋯ A mechanical retractor method (gasless) was compared with conventional CO2 pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholestectomy. The gasless method ensured stable hemodynamics, prevented respiratory acidosis, and provided protection against the renal and splanchnic ischemia seen with CO2 pneumoperitoneum.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effects of dexamethasone on antiemetics in female patients undergoing gynecologic surgery.
This randomized, double-blind study compared the effects of dexamethasone plus either droperidol, metoclopramide, or granisetron with each antiemetic alone for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in 270 female patients undergoing general anesthesia for major gynecological surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either droperidol 1.25 mg (Group D1, n = 45), droperidol 1.25 mg plus dexamethasone 8 mg (Group D2, n = 45), metoclopramide 10 mg (Group M1, n = 45), metoclopramide 10 mg plus dexamethasone 8 mg (Group M2, n = 45), granisetron 40 micrograms/kg (Group G1, n = 45), or granisetron 40 micrograms/kg plus dexamethasone 8 mg (Group G2, n = 45) immediately before the induction of anesthesia. A standard general anesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia were used throughout the study. Complete response, defined as no PONV and no administration of rescue antiemetic medication during the first 24 h after anesthesia, was 49% in Group D1, 60% in Group D2 (P = 0.199 versus Group D1), 51% in Group M1, 62% in Group M2 (P = 0.198 versus Group M1), 80% in Group G1, and 96% in Group G2 (P = 0.025 versus Group G1). Our results suggest that dexamethasone enhances the antiemetic efficacy of granisetron but does not potentiate the other antiemetics-droperidol and metoclopramide-in female patients undergoing major gynecological surgery. ⋯ We compared the efficacy of dexamethasone plus three different antiemetics-droperidol, metoclopramide, and granisetron-for the prevention of nausea and vomiting after gynecologic surgery. The granisetron-dexamethasone combination was the most effective for preventing post-operative emetic symptoms.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of the effect of intrathecal and extradural fentanyl on gastric emptying in laboring women.
We studied gastric emptying, using acetaminophen absorption, in 105 women in labor divided into three equal groups of 35 each, after intrathecal (i.t.) (25 micrograms, Group S) or extradural (50 micrograms, Group E) fentanyl in combination with bupivacaine and compared with a control group (Group C) receiving extradural bupivacaine only. The time to maximal acetaminophen concentration (tCamax), maximal acetaminophen concentration (Camax), and areas under the acetaminophen concentration-time curve at 90 and 120 min (AUC90 and AUC120, respectively) were determined. Median (range) tCamax values were 120 (15-180), 82.5 (15-180), and 90 (15-180) min in Groups S, E, and C, respectively (P < 0.05). Mean +/- SD Camax was 13.4 +/- 8.82, 17.9 +/- 8.06, and 15.0 +/- 6.22 micrograms/mL in Groups S, E, and C, respectively (P < 0.05). Mean +/- SD AUC90 and AUC120 were also significantly smaller in Group S than in the other two groups (430 +/- 616, 736 +/- 504, and 672 +/- 453; and 649 +/- 592, 1063 +/- 627, and 1053 +/- 616 micrograms.mL-1.min-1 in Groups S, E, and C, respectively). We conclude that the administration of fentanyl 25 micrograms i.t. delays gastric emptying in labor compared with both extradural fentanyl 50 micrograms with bupivacaine and extradural bupivacaine alone. ⋯ We examined emptying of the stomach in women in labor after administration of analgesics by the spinal or the epidural route. We observed that the analgesic, fentanyl, administered by the spinal route, although relieving pain rapidly, may delay emptying of the stomach. In theory, delayed gastric emptying may increase the chance of vomiting and aspiration of gastric contents.