Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effects of dexamethasone on antiemetics in female patients undergoing gynecologic surgery.
This randomized, double-blind study compared the effects of dexamethasone plus either droperidol, metoclopramide, or granisetron with each antiemetic alone for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in 270 female patients undergoing general anesthesia for major gynecological surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either droperidol 1.25 mg (Group D1, n = 45), droperidol 1.25 mg plus dexamethasone 8 mg (Group D2, n = 45), metoclopramide 10 mg (Group M1, n = 45), metoclopramide 10 mg plus dexamethasone 8 mg (Group M2, n = 45), granisetron 40 micrograms/kg (Group G1, n = 45), or granisetron 40 micrograms/kg plus dexamethasone 8 mg (Group G2, n = 45) immediately before the induction of anesthesia. A standard general anesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia were used throughout the study. Complete response, defined as no PONV and no administration of rescue antiemetic medication during the first 24 h after anesthesia, was 49% in Group D1, 60% in Group D2 (P = 0.199 versus Group D1), 51% in Group M1, 62% in Group M2 (P = 0.198 versus Group M1), 80% in Group G1, and 96% in Group G2 (P = 0.025 versus Group G1). Our results suggest that dexamethasone enhances the antiemetic efficacy of granisetron but does not potentiate the other antiemetics-droperidol and metoclopramide-in female patients undergoing major gynecological surgery. ⋯ We compared the efficacy of dexamethasone plus three different antiemetics-droperidol, metoclopramide, and granisetron-for the prevention of nausea and vomiting after gynecologic surgery. The granisetron-dexamethasone combination was the most effective for preventing post-operative emetic symptoms.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSplanchnic and renal deterioration during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison of the carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and the abdominal wall lift method.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum together with an increased intraabdominal pressure (IAP) induces a hemodynamic stress response, diminishes urine output, and may compromise splanchnic perfusion. A new retractor method may be less traumatic. Accordingly, 30 ASA physical status I or II patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to a CO2 pneumoperitoneum (IAP 12-13 mm Hg) (control) or to a gasless abdominal wall lift method (retractor) group. Anesthesia and intravascular fluids were standardized. Direct mean arterial pressure (MAP), urine output, urine-N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (U-NAG), arterial blood gases, gastric mucosal PCO2, and intramucosal pH (pHi) were measured. Normoventilation was instituted in all patients. MAP increased (P < 0.001) only with CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Minute volume of ventilation had to be increased by 35% with CO2 insufflation. PaCO2 was significantly higher (P < 0.05) for 3 h postoperatively in the control group. Diuresis was less (P < 0.01) and U-NAG levels (P < 0.01) higher in the control group. The pHi decreased after induction of pneumoperitoneum up to three hours postoperatively and remained intact in the retractor group. We conclude that the retractor method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy ensures stable hemodynamics, prevents respiratory acidosis, and provides protection against biochemical effects, which reveal the renal and splanchic ischemia caused by CO2 insufflation. ⋯ A mechanical retractor method (gasless) was compared with conventional CO2 pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholestectomy. The gasless method ensured stable hemodynamics, prevented respiratory acidosis, and provided protection against the renal and splanchnic ischemia seen with CO2 pneumoperitoneum.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of the effect of intrathecal and extradural fentanyl on gastric emptying in laboring women.
We studied gastric emptying, using acetaminophen absorption, in 105 women in labor divided into three equal groups of 35 each, after intrathecal (i.t.) (25 micrograms, Group S) or extradural (50 micrograms, Group E) fentanyl in combination with bupivacaine and compared with a control group (Group C) receiving extradural bupivacaine only. The time to maximal acetaminophen concentration (tCamax), maximal acetaminophen concentration (Camax), and areas under the acetaminophen concentration-time curve at 90 and 120 min (AUC90 and AUC120, respectively) were determined. Median (range) tCamax values were 120 (15-180), 82.5 (15-180), and 90 (15-180) min in Groups S, E, and C, respectively (P < 0.05). Mean +/- SD Camax was 13.4 +/- 8.82, 17.9 +/- 8.06, and 15.0 +/- 6.22 micrograms/mL in Groups S, E, and C, respectively (P < 0.05). Mean +/- SD AUC90 and AUC120 were also significantly smaller in Group S than in the other two groups (430 +/- 616, 736 +/- 504, and 672 +/- 453; and 649 +/- 592, 1063 +/- 627, and 1053 +/- 616 micrograms.mL-1.min-1 in Groups S, E, and C, respectively). We conclude that the administration of fentanyl 25 micrograms i.t. delays gastric emptying in labor compared with both extradural fentanyl 50 micrograms with bupivacaine and extradural bupivacaine alone. ⋯ We examined emptying of the stomach in women in labor after administration of analgesics by the spinal or the epidural route. We observed that the analgesic, fentanyl, administered by the spinal route, although relieving pain rapidly, may delay emptying of the stomach. In theory, delayed gastric emptying may increase the chance of vomiting and aspiration of gastric contents.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEpidural bolus clonidine/morphine versus epidural patient-controlled bupivacaine/sufentanil: quality of postoperative analgesia and cost-identification analysis.
We compared the costs, quality of analgesia, and side effects of postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with bupivacaine/sufentanil versus an epidural bolus (BOLUS) of clonidine/morphine in 68 patients with pancreatic surgery. Postoperative pain treatment was performed over 4 days: the PCEA pump was filled with bupivacaine 0.25% and sufentanil 2 micrograms/mL and set to 3-mL bolus and 10-min lockout time. BOLUS patients received injections of clonidine 150 micrograms plus morphine 2 mg on demand. Visual analog scale (VAS) score at rest and during coughing, heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, duration of intestinal paralysis, hospital treatment, and costs for personnel and material were recorded. VAS scores during coughing (3 +/- 2.5 vs 5 +/- 3, P < 0.001) was higher, and HR (79 +/- 13 vs 89 +/- 15, P < 0.001), and SAP (110 +/- 18 vs 124 +/- 23, P < 0.001) were lower, in the BOLUS compared with the PCEA group. The incidence of hypotension (SAP < 80 mm Hg) was greater (6 vs 0, P < 0.001) in the BOLUS group. The incidence of all other side effects was comparable. The costs of personnel ($204 +/- $40 vs $166 +/- $38, P < 0.001) were higher in the BOLUS group, but the costs of material ($51 +/- $17 vs $87 +/- $18, P < 0.001) were higher in the PCEA group. Total costs ($62 +/- $9 vs $62 +/- $11 per day, P = 0.9) were comparable. We conclude that because of superior analgesia and reduced side effects at analogous costs, PCEA is preferable to the BOLUS technique for the treatment of postoperative pain. ⋯ An epidural clonidine/morphine bolus technique resulted in inferior analgesia, more side effects, and comparable costs compared with a bupivacaine/sufentanil patient-controlled regimen in a randomized controlled trial after abdominal surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPressure support ventilation augments spontaneous breathing with improved thoracoabdominal synchrony in neonates with congenital heart disease.
In neonates, during spontaneous breathing with demand-type continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), high airway resistance caused by small endotracheal tubes, time delay for triggering, and rapid respiratory frequency may result in patient-ventilator asynchrony. Such asynchrony may alter normal breathing patterns and thoracoabdominal synchrony. We, therefore, studied whether pressure support ventilation (PSV) could augment spontaneous breathing and improve synchrony between the rib cage (RC) and the abdominal (AB) motions in nine postoperative neonates with congenital heart disease. Three successive levels of PSV (0, 5, and 10 cm H2O) were used randomly. With increasing levels of PSV, the tidal volume (VT) increased and the respiratory frequency decreased, associated with an increase in minute ventilation. To assess thoracoabdominal synchrony, maximum compartment amplitude (MCA)/VT (MCA = AB + RC) and the phase delay of the RC-to-AB motion during inspiration (the ratio of the time delay to the inspiratory time) were measured using respiratory inductive plethysmography. When the motions of the RC and AB were out of phase, MCA/VT exceeded 1.0. MCA/VT decreased significantly from 1.3 +/- 0.3 without PSV to 1.0 +/- 0.0 with PSV of 10 cm H2O. The phase delay and paradoxical motion of the RC observed in seven of the nine cases without PSV also disappeared with PSV of 10 cm H2O. In conclusion, PSV can effectively augment spontaneous breathing with better thoracoabdominal synchrony in neonates. ⋯ Assisting spontaneous ventilation in a neonate is often difficult. Because pressure support ventilation facilitates coordination between the patient and ventilator in adults and children, we thought it might be effective in neonates. Our study supports this conclusion.