Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of continuous spinal with combined spinal-epidural anesthesia using plain bupivacaine 0.5% in trauma patients.
We investigated the efficacy and complications of microcatheter spinal anesthesia (CSA) in comparison to a combined spinal-epidural technique (CSE) using plain bupivacaine 0.5%. Sixty trauma patients randomly received either CSA using a 22-gauge Sprotte needle and a 28-gauge microcatheter or CSE after insertion of a 22-gauge epidural catheter through an 18-gauge Tuohy needle followed by dural puncture with a 25-gauge pencil-point needle inserted through the backeye of the Tuohy needle. An initial subarachnoid bolus of 2 mL of plain bupivacaine 0.5% was injected. ⋯ However, more patients in the CSE group were treated for bradycardia (4 vs 0). The number of patients suffering from postdural puncture headache was comparable in both groups, but there were more patients with lower back pain in the CSE group (8 vs 2). In conclusion, our data suggest that microcatheter CSA is not associated with an increased rate of complication in patients with lower limb fractures.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialMidazolam premedication delays recovery after propofol without modifying involuntary movements.
Midazolam has GABAergic effects in children that may modify propofol-induced involuntary movements, yet delay recovery. In a double-blind, randomized study, 24 children (2-7 yr of age, ASA physical status I or II) undergoing short surgical procedures received midazolam 0.5 mg/kg (Group M) or placebo (Group P) per os 20-30 min before propofol anesthesia (5 mg/kg intravenously followed by an infusion). Blind observers scored sedation and anxiety levels (scale 1-4) before premedication, at separation from parents, and at induction of anesthesia. ⋯ Anxiety and sedation scores were similar in Group P and Group M, but recovery took longer after midazolam, with eye opening (mean +/- SD) 24 +/- 7 vs 43 +/- 18 min, maximum SS (median and range) 27 (13-37) vs 55 (24-138) min, and maximum VSRS 51 (30-100) vs 80 (50-130) min. Children returned to normal activity in 1 (0-5) day, and none exhibited neurological complications. We conclude that an oral premedicant dose of midazolam prolongs recovery from anesthesia in children without affecting dystonic movements after propofol.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effects of adding sufentanil to bupivacaine for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia.
We tested the hypothesis that postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia was more effective with the combination of sufentanil and bupivacaine (Group 2) than with bupivacaine alone (Group 1). One hundred patients undergoing thoracic, upper abdominal, and aortic surgery were provided with an epidural catheter and randomly allocated to one of the two groups. Postoperatively, patients were monitored in a postanesthetic care unit for at least 1 day before they were transferred to a ward. ⋯ Motor block was only seen in patients with lumbar epidural catheters. There was no difference between groups, and all patients with thoracic catheters could be mobilized beginning on the first postoperative day. We conclude that 1) the addition of sufentanil to a small-dose bupivacaine augments epidural analgesia and 2) thoracic epidural catheters should be used for postoperative analgesia after abdominal or thoracic surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPreemptive epidural morphine for postoperative pain relief after lumbar laminectomy.
This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive epidural morphine for postoperative analgesia after lumbar laminectomy. Thirty ASA physical status I adults undergoing elective lumbar laminectomy under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Group 1 (study group) received 3 mg epidural morphine preemptively 60 min before surgery, followed by epidural placebo at the end of surgery. ⋯ The demand for supplementary analgesia and postoperative morphine consumption in the preemptive group was significantly lower than that in control group (P < 0.05). Patients in the control group were significantly sedated after 12 h and had a high incidence of nausea and vomiting (P < 0.05). The study shows that preemptive epidural morphine is superior to epidural morphine given postoperatively for pain relief after lumbar laminectomy.