The Annals of thoracic surgery
-
Esophageal duplication cysts are rare and frequently asymptomatic anomalies of the adult gastrointestinal tract that are often misdiagnosed in clinical practice. Identifying the unique features of esophageal duplication cysts is therefore important. ⋯ Enucleation was not feasible, and therefore, esophagectomy was performed. The only long-term side effect that occurred after 44 months of follow-up examinations was slight acid reflux esophagitis.
-
Review Meta Analysis
A meta-analysis of resected metachronous second non-small cell lung cancer.
This meta-analysis was designed to determine the effect of surgical treatment on overall survival of patients treated surgically for a second non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that occurred after resection of an initial NSCLC. PubMed and Scopus databases were queried. ⋯ Meta-analyses revealed pooled operative mortality of 7% for the second resection, pooled 5-year overall survival of 46% after resection of the second NSCLC, and 79% after resection of the first NSCLC. These results suggest that surgical resection can be considered for patients who have a second primary NSCLC after resection of an initial lung cancer.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Challenge for perceval: aortic valve replacement with small sutureless valves--a multicenter study.
There is controversy concerning the performance of small aortic prostheses (size < 21). These have been associated with morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement (AVR) due to their increased gradient. Sutureless technology is now available but the performance of the smallest of these prostheses needs to be assessed. ⋯ This multicenter study confirms the safety, efficacy, and ease of insertion of Perceval valves in elderly patients with small annulus. The performance of the smaller prosthesis was satisfying and prosthesis size did not affect patient outcome.
-
Comparative Study
Propensity adjusted analysis of open and endovascular thoracic aortic repair for chronic type B dissection: a twenty-year evaluation.
Optimal treatment of chronic type B aortic dissection (CBAD), whether open (open descending aortic repair, OAR) or endovascular (thoracic endovascular aortic repair, TEVAR), is controversial, suggesting a comparative analysis is warranted. ⋯ Intervention for CBAD can be performed with excellent results, either by an open or endovascular approach. The higher rate of treatment failure after TEVAR warrants modification of current device design or endovascular approach before broad application of this treatment strategy.