Transplantation proceedings
-
The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), based on creatinine, bilirubin, and International normalized ratio (INR), has been shown to be superior to the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score in predicting 3-month mortality among patients on the transplant waiting list due to end-stage liver disease (ESLD). An additional advantage of MELD is the possibility to add "adjustment points" for exceptional patients at risk for death because of liver disease not identified by changes in the used parameters, as occurs in the case of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although it is useful, MELD has some important limitations: There are no differences for patients with or without ascites, and for the absence of other laboratory parameters involved in the etiology of disease. In this study, we evaluated dropouts of patients on the waiting list for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) based upon the characteristics of these subjects before and after introduction of the MELD score. ⋯ The use of MELD score in this group of patients produced an advantage for HCC, but seemed to cutoff patients with viral hepatitis complications during the waiting time. Particularly, about one in every 11 patients may receive an harm using this score system. Other parameters should be introduced as adjustment points to make the MELD score suitable also for patients with infectious liver diseases.
-
Superimposed acute right ventricular dysfunction in the setting of preexisting pulmonary hypertension is a nearly fatal complication after heart transplantation. The optimal treatment modality remains a matter of debate. Recently, sildenafil citrate, a nonselective pulmonary vasodilator, has gained popularity in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension in transplant candidates. ⋯ Management of acute right ventricular dysfunction in heart transplant recipients with pulmonary hypertension using sildenafil proved safe and effective.
-
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has proven to be a safe and effective technique in the treatment of respiratory failure complicating various medical and surgical diseases. In recent years, a growing interest has emerged in its adoption for ventilatory assistance in immunocompromised patients, such as those undergoing bone marrow, liver, lung, cardiac, and kidney transplantation. Weaning from the ventilator after liver transplantation can take longer because of unsatisfactory gas exchange during various attempts of T-piece trials. ⋯ Clinical experience has shown that properly delivered NIV mostly benefits moderately dyspneic recipients in acute respiratory failure, while it appears less promising and efficient in patients ventilated for extended periods of time. It has proven safe and efficient mainly as (1) a tool to promote an early ventilatory discontinuation and extubation; (2) a prophylactic strategy for preventing postoperative pulmonary complications; and (3) a simple method to start with in cases of acute hypoxic and/or hypercapnic respiratory failure. The improvements in arterial hypoxemia, the decreased ventilatory demand provided with an inspiratory support, as well as the scarcity of hemodynamic repercussions are among the major benefits of this method.
-
Evaluation of research products released during activities that have received public funds should be a mandatory practice. In this study, we evaluated the research products released during the research program "Innovative Strategies to Expand Cadaveric Donor Pool for Liver Transplantation" (SITF Project), funded by the Italian Ministry of Health. The SITF Project prefigured the participation of Italian transplantation centers with more advanced experience in the field of liver transplantation. ⋯ Spearman's rank test found a weak negative correlation between journal IF and number of published articles (r= -.2919; P= .413). Although the OU involved in the coordination of the SITF Project released a relatively high number of articles (n=8; IF, 0.923+/-0.352), several other OUs obtained better results for number of articles (9-11) and/or IF (3.071+/-2.248 or 2.959+/-1.779). In projects that benefit from public funds, the potential negative impact of coordination activities to scientific production should be adequately considered.