Cancer research
-
Four second-generation Illudin analogues were synthesized and tested for antitumor activity using a metastatic lung carcinoma xenograft model resistant to conventional antitumor agents. One analogue, the parent illudofulvene-derivative called Acylfulvene, inhibited xenograft primary tumor growth and prolonged life span of tumor-bearing animals when administered i.p. or i.v. The efficacy of Acylfulvene exceeded that of mitomycin C, cisplatin, paclitaxol, the parent compound Illudin S, and an earlier analogue, dehydroilludin M. Promising features of this new analogue are: (a) the retention of in vitro activity against a variety of mdr tumor phenotypes including gp170+, gp150+, GSHTR-Pi, topoisomerase I, and topoisomerase II mutants; and (b) an apparent selective cytotoxicity toward cells deficient in either ERCC2 or ERCC3 DNA helicase activity.
-
The tumor suppressor gene CDKN2/p16/MTS1, located on chromosome 9p21, is frequently inactivated in many human cancers through homozygous deletion. Recently, we have reported another pathway of inactivation that involves loss of transcription associated with de novo methylation of a 5' CpG island of CDKN2/p16 in lung cancers, gliomas, and head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. ⋯ This alteration of p16 in colon cancer was particularly striking, since inactivation does not occur through homozygous deletion in this tumor type. Our data show that in tumors, de novo methylation of the 5' CpG island is a frequent mode of inactivation of CDKN2/p16 and also firmly demonstrate that CDKN2/p16 is one of the most frequently altered genes in human neoplasia.
-
Clinical Trial
A phase I trial of amifostine (WR-2721) and melphalan in children with refractory cancer.
Melphalan has a steep dose-response curve, but the use of high doses results in unacceptable myelosuppression. Strategies to circumvent this dose-limiting myelosuppression would allow for the administration of higher, more effective doses of melphalan. Amifostine (WR-2721) has been shown in preclinical studies to protect the bone marrow from the myelotoxicity of melphalan, and in clinical trials, to protect from the myelotoxicity of other alkylating agents. ⋯ Although no dose-limiting (grade 3 or 4) toxicity was attributed to amifostine, significant anxiety and reversible urinary retention occurred at the two highest amifostine dose levels. A dose of 1650 mg/m2 for pediatric Phase II trials is recommended. High doses of amifostine, however, do not appear to allow for escalation of melphalan beyond its single agent MTD of 35 mg/m2.
-
We have previously described a mitoxantrone-resistant human breast carcinoma cell line, MCF7/MX, in which resistance was associated with a defect in the energy-dependent accumulation of mitoxantrone in the absence of P-glycoprotein overexpression (M. Nakagawa et al., Cancer Res. 52: 6175-6181, 1992). We now report that this cell line is highly cross-resistant to the camptothecin analogues topotecan (180-fold), 9-aminocamptothecin (120-fold), CPT-11 (56-fold), and SN38 (101-fold), but is only mildly cross-resistant to the parent compound camptothecin (3.2-fold) and 10,11-methylenedioxy-camptothecin (2.9-fold). ⋯ No overexpression of the multidrug resistance-associated protein was detected compared to parental MCF7/WT cells. Furthermore, both sensitive MCF7/WT and mitoxantrone-resistant MCF7/MX cells contain equal amounts of DNA topoisomerase I protein, and DNA relaxation activities were equal in both cell lines and inhibited to the same extent by topotecan and camptothecin. Thus, these results suggest a novel mechanism of resistance to topoisomerase I inhibitors in cancer cells.
-
Exposure to carcinogens present in the diet, cigarette smoke, or the environment may be associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer. Aromatic amines (aryl- and heterocyclic) are a class of carcinogens that are important in these exposures. These compounds can be N- or O-acetylated by the NAT1 or NAT2 enzymes, resulting in activation or in some cases detoxification. ⋯ In contrast, rapid acetylation genotypes of NAT2 were not a significant risk factor in this English population. However, we found that the risk associated with the NAT1 variant allele (NAT1*10) was most apparent among NAT2 rapid acetylators (odds ratio, 2.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-5.7; P = 0.003), suggesting a possible gene-gene interaction between NAT1 and NAT2 (test for interaction; P = 0.12). This is the first study to test for cancer risk associated with the NAT1 gene, and these positive findings suggest that NAT1 alleles may be important genetic determinents of colorectal cancer risk.