Military medicine
-
Size-matched volunteer studies report gender-dependent variations in spine morphology, and head mass and inertia properties. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of these properties on upper and lower cervical spine temporal kinematics during G+x loading. ⋯ Models with lesser vertebral depth, that is, female-like spines, experienced greater range of motions and pronounced nonphysiological curves. This results in greater distraction/stretch of the posterior upper spine complex, a phenomenon attributed to suboccipital headaches. Forward location of head cg along anteroposterior axis had the greatest influence on upper and lower spine motions and time of formation of the curve. Any increased anteroposterior location of cg attributable to head supported mass may induce greater risk of injuries/neck pain in women during G+x loading.
-
Norovirus, a contagious disease that spreads rapidly in close-quartered communities, has a debilitating effect in military settings, affecting troops' health, productivity, and mission-readiness. This research presents a model of norovirus transmission, testing the vaccination's effectiveness in military training centers. ⋯ Given vaccine characteristics, the model predicted that up to 15% of norovirus cases occurring in training settings over a 10-year period could be prevented by vaccinating all trainees and staff members immediately upon arrival on-base combined with continuous environmental decontamination. There was an impact on morbidity from implementing vaccination of trainees, alone and in combination with staff members. However, vaccinating staff alone prevented few cases over the simulation period, indicating the importance of trainees in norovirus transmission. Likewise, the negligible impact of environmental decontamination or contact reduction alone highlights the importance of addressing both person-to-person and environmental transmission together to minimize illnesses and training downtime.
-
Comparative Study
A Comparison of Nonhuman Primate Injuries in Horizontal Versus Vertical Sled +Gz (Head-to-Foot) Impact Accelerations.
Accelerative events commonly expose military pilots to potentially injurious + Gz (axial, caudal to cranial) accelerations. The Naval Biodynamics Laboratory exposed nonhuman primates (NHPs) to + Gz loading in two subject orientations (supine or upright) to assess the effect of orientation and accelerations associated with injury at accelerations unsafe for human participation. ⋯ Axial loading to supine occupants produced more CNS injuries, whereas upright produced more MSK injuries. Both orientations produced equal THR injuries. NHP injuries reported reflected those reported following human + Gz acceleration events, highlighting the importance of orientation during acceleration to mitigate injury for next generation equipment design and testing.
-
The purpose of this pilot study was to obtain preliminary data to culturally adapt the Veteran Health Administration Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) assessment instruments for the Hispanic Veteran population. A qualitative analysis explored the cognitive processes used by Hispanic Veterans whose preferred language was Spanish to understand a specific set of screening questions within the Initial TBI Screening, the Comprehensive TBI Evaluation, the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI), and the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire (LTCQ). ⋯ Current findings highlight the importance of using linguistically and culturally appropriate materials upon evaluating Hispanic Veterans with a suspected TBI who have Spanish as their primary or preferred language.
-
Rehabilitation research of wounded service members (SMs) commonly focuses on physical ability to return to duty (RTD) as a measure of successful recovery. However, numerous factors or barriers may influence a SM's ability and/or desire to RTD after lower extremity musculoskeletal trauma. SMs themselves as well as the clinical care team that works with them daily, often for years at a time, both offer unique perspectives on the influential factors that weigh into decisions to RTD. The purpose of this study was to identify the intrinsic and extrinsic factors patients and clinicians recognized as influencing the decision to RTD after severe lower extremity trauma. ⋯ Characterization and classification of these clinician and SM-identified factors that influence the decision to RTD after severe lower extremity trauma is expected to improve the efficacy of future rehabilitation efforts and clinical practice guidelines by providing the clinical team the knowledge necessary to recognize modifiable barriers to patient success. A better understanding of factors influencing RTD decision-making may support policies for mitigating RTD barriers, better monitoring of the changing landscape of RTD after lower extremity trauma, improving systems of health care, and/or reducing turnover and facilitating force readiness.