Military medicine
-
The Department of Defense spends more than $3 billion annually on medical costs of lifestyle-related morbidity. Military service members and veterans engage in unhealthy behaviors at a higher rate than the civilian population. Lifestyle medicine may mitigate lifestyle-related chronic diseases and increase medical readiness in the U.S. Military. However, patients' perspectives in a military community regarding a lifestyle medicine-based approach to health care have not been studied. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and attitudes of and interest in lifestyle medicine-based care within a military community. ⋯ Despite an overall low level of awareness of lifestyle medicine, most respondents expressed interest in a lifestyle medicine approach to health care, with food/nutrition and sleep ranked as the most important domains. Lower levels of education may be a potential barrier to patient willingness to engage in lifestyle medicine care. Service members in combat arms occupational specialties may represent a potential target population for smoking cessation interventions. Further research with a larger sample more proportionately inclusive of all military service branches is needed.
-
Although active duty women (ADW) represent over 17% of the total U. S. Armed Forces, there are few evidence-based guidelines to promote the health of women who serve in contemporary military roles. ⋯ Optimizing the health of this population is critical to maintaining the strength and readiness of our U. S. Armed Forces.
-
Cancers of unknown primary (CUP) are defined as histologically confirmed metastatic cancers that do not have an identified primary site of origin despite an appropriate diagnostic workup. Although accessibility to and quality of medical care influence diagnosis of cancer including CUP, previous studies describing CUP have generally been conducted in patients with various accessibilities to care. This study aimed to describe the demographic, histologic, and temporal trend characteristics of CUP patients in the DoD Cancer Registry of the Military Health System (MHS), which provides universal health care access, reducing the potential effects of accessibility to care on research results. ⋯ The proportion and trends of CUP in the ACTUR were generally consistent with other descriptive CUP studies. This study provides a description of CUP in a health care system with universal access in the USA and provides a foundation for future studies on CUP.
-
As part of their day-to-day operational mission, shipboard sailors experience unique stressors that can affect their health and readiness. The San Diego Fleet and Family Support Center (FFSC) conducts in-person classes to teach stress management principles to sailors. The FFSC stress management course covers the causes and consequences of stress, reviews the Navy Operational Stress Control model, and provides information on basic stress management skills. This course has not been rigorously evaluated to determine its impact on the sailors' ability to manage stress. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term impact of the FFSC stress management class on the (1) sailors' stress management knowledge, (2) sailors' intention to share knowledge from the class with others, and (3) sailors' satisfaction with the class. ⋯ This study was the first evaluation of the short-term impact of the FFSC stress management course on the stress management knowledge of shipboard crews. Study limitations prevented the study team from assessing the long-term impact of the stress management course on future stress levels and stress abatement behaviors. Recommendations are made to enhance future evaluations of FFSC classes for service members.
-
As of early 2022, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic still represents a worldwide medical emergency situation. The ongoing vaccination programs can slow down the spread of the virus; however, from time to time, the newly emerging variants of concern and antivaccination movements carry the possibility for the disease to remain in our daily lives. After the appearance of SARS-CoV-2, there was scholarly debate whether the virus was of natural origin, or it emerged from a laboratory, some even thinking the agent's potential biological weapon properties suggest the latter scenario. Later, the bioweapon theory was dismissed by the majority of experts, but the question remains that despite its natural origin, how potent a biological weapon the SARS-CoV-2 virus can become over time. ⋯ Our results show that the virus can become a potent bioweapon candidate in the future, achieving a total score of 24 out of 36 on the original 12 criteria. The SARS-CoV-2 has already proven its pandemic generating potential and, despite worldwide efforts, still remains an imminent threat. In order to be prepared for the future possibility of the virus arising as a bioweapon, we must remain cautious and take the necessary countermeasures.