Military medicine
-
The National Defense Authorization Act of 2017 indicated the need for a national strategy to improve trauma care among military treatment facilities (MTFs). Part of the proposed strategy to improve trauma outcomes was to convert identified MTFs into verified trauma centers. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) verifies trauma centers through an evaluation process based on available resources at a facility. It has been proven that trauma centers, specifically those verified by the ACS, have improved trauma outcomes. In 2017, we implemented steps to become a level III trauma program, according to the standards for designation by the state and verification through the ACS. The goal of this retrospective review is to evaluate the impact of this implementation with regard to both patient care and the MTF. ⋯ The establishment of a trauma program in accordance with the standards of the ACS for verification improved metrics of care for trauma patients at our MTF. This implementation as part of the local trauma system also led to increased injury severity seen by the MTF, which enhances readiness for its providers.
-
The incidence of blast injuries on the battlefield has risen over the last several decades. In order to improve prevention and treatment, it is essential to understand the severity and bodily distribution of these injuries. This study aims to characterize blast injury patterns among IDF fatalities. ⋯ Level III, Retrospective analysis.
-
Nearly a billion dollars is spent annually in the Military Health System (MHS) on cancer diagnosis and treatment, with a large portion of that directed toward breast, prostate, and ovarian cancers. Multiple studies have demonstrated the impact of specific cancers on MHS beneficiaries and Veterans, highlighting the fact that active duty and retired military members have a higher incidence than the general public for many chronic diseases and certain forms of cancer. The Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs have supported research that has contributed to the development, clinical testing, and commercialization of 11 cancer drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat breast, prostate, or ovarian cancers. In addition to hallmark funding mechanisms that prioritize innovative, groundbreaking ideas, the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Program's cancer programs continue to identify new approaches to fill critical gaps across the full research spectrum, including bridging the translational research gap toward developing new treatments for cancer patients in the MHS and in the general American public.
-
The U.S. Navy routinely deploys aircraft carriers and amphibious assault ships throughout the world in support of U.S. strategic interests, each with an embarked single surgeon team. Surgeons and their teams are required to participate in lengthy pre-deployment shipboard certifications before each deployment. Given the well-established relationship of surgeon volume to patient outcome, we aim to compare the impact of land vs. maritime deployments on Navy general surgeon practice patterns. ⋯ Surgeons are a critical component of combat causality care teams. In this analysis, we have demonstrated that both land- and maritime-based U.S. Navy surgeons have prolonged periods away from clinical care before and during deployments; for shipboard surgeons, this deficit is large and may negatively impact patient outcomes in the deployed maritime environment. The authors describe this discrepancy and provide practical doctrinal solutions to close this readiness gap.
-
The VestAid is a tablet-based application that provides feedback about a patient's eye/head movements during exercise after concussion. The goal of this case series was to determine if VestAid could be used to detect eye-gaze accuracy in a participant exposed to directed energy (DE). ⋯ VestAid provided unique information about eye-gaze accuracy that detected eye movement abnormalities in the participants with DE exposure, concussion, and vestibular neuritis. The objective metrics of eye-gaze stability correlate with participants' symptoms and perceived difficulty of the eye/head movements.