Military medicine
-
A deeper understanding of personality specifics in military personnel may increase the efficacy of health care professionals in this field. Changes in modern warfare require army officers to make decisions in complicated situations with increasing levels of autonomy. Character is traditionally regarded as a key quality in these dynamics. However, it remains unclear which character strengths are conducive to effective leadership in the military. The present study aims at mapping Czech Army cadets' and professional soldiers' perceptions of the character strengths of those officers, who they consider the best they served under. The study also examined how these perceptions vary across soldiers at different stages of their careers and how much they overlap with the same soldiers' ratings of their own strengths. In addition, a regression analysis, to outline combinations of strengths for various aspects of character-based leadership, was performed. ⋯ The present study achieved its aims. First, it suggests the officers' character strengths that tend to be most valued by their subordinates among Czech Army cadets and soldiers serving in reconnaissance units. Second, the strong overlap of best officers' character profiles in all groups suggests that this perception may remain stable throughout a soldier's career. Third, the relationship between chosen officers' and respondents' self-reported strengths was negligible, suggesting that the perception of officer's strengths may not be an individual's projection. Fourth, regression models of character-based leadership proposed a combination of character strengths that may contribute to the officer's perceived efficacy. Compared to other studies, the sample included both cadets and military professionals with a proportional number of females being included. These results imply that health care practitioners working with military clients may benefit from the acknowledgment of their specific character strengths, most notably honesty and fairness, while providing care to this population.
-
The prevalence of tobacco use in the Veteran population and among Veterans Health Administration patients remains high, resulting in significant health and economic consequences. This problem has generated many tobacco research studies and clinical interventions, which often rely upon tobacco use status data previously recorded in electronic health records (EHR). Therefore, the consistency and reliability of these data are critical. The Veterans Health Administration uses an extensive EHR system where tobacco use status can be documented either as free text (FT) or as health factors (HF). The current literature assessing the reliability of HF and FT data is limited. This analysis evaluated the agreement between HF and FT tobacco use status data. ⋯ Agreement between HF and FT data that document the tobacco use statuses of Veterans varied because of implausible data. HF data had fewer implausible tobacco use statuses, but FT data were recorded more frequently. Although HF and FT data can be reasonably relied upon to determine the tobacco use statuses of Veterans, researchers and clinicians must be aware of implausible data and consider methods to overcome this limitation. Future studies should investigate the ways of improving the consistency of EHR documentation by health care providers and benchmark HF and FT data against a gold standard like biochemical verification to determine accuracy.
-
Operations in the Middle East have slowed, and near-peer tensions escalate. The U. S. ⋯ Furthermore, use of ACNPs in theater could advance deployed medical capabilities and help conserve the fighting force of the U. S. Military and its partners.
-
Military health care personnel face numerous risks to mental health, including those associated with combat injury, although no study has described combat injuries within this subgroup or assessed their impact on mental health outcomes. ⋯ U.S. Navy corpsmen are at risk of combat injury and associated mental health disorders. Injured corpsmen should be screened for mental health problems in the acute phase postinjury, during their remaining time in theater, and after returning home. Future research should address how combat injury compares with other stressors that health care personnel experience and whether the psychological consequences of these injuries (e.g., PTSD) negatively impact work performance and increase risk of burnout.
-
In response to the Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act being signed into law, several research groups in Colorado organized the First Annual PACT Act Research Symposium for Veteran Health. The 2-day symposium was interested in research relevant to military exposures with a primary focus on respiratory and mental health. Information on the PACT Act, data sources in the Department of Veteran Affairs and DOD, and research opportunities at the Veteran Affairs were presented. ⋯ On the second day of meetings, a smaller group of participants discussed next steps in military exposure research, as well as priorities for future research. Per the latter, recommendations for future research were made regarding the need for more precise exposure characterization, longitudinal data collection, and efforts to increase understanding regarding disease pathogenesis, as well as the impact of exposures across multiple organs. Such efforts will require interdisciplinary collaboration.