Health physics
-
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements Commentary 27 examines recent epidemiologic data primarily from low-dose or low dose-rate studies of low linear-energy-transfer radiation and cancer to assess whether they support the linear no-threshold model as used in radiation protection. The commentary provides a critical review of low-dose or low dose-rate studies, most published within the last 10 y, that are applicable to current occupational, environmental, and medical radiation exposures. The strengths and weaknesses of the epidemiologic methods, dosimetry assessments, and statistical modeling of 29 epidemiologic studies of total solid cancer, leukemia, breast cancer, and thyroid cancer, as well as heritable effects and a few nonmalignant conditions, were evaluated. ⋯ Nonetheless, the preponderance of recent epidemiologic data on solid cancer is supportive of the continued use of the linear no-threshold model for the purposes of radiation protection. This conclusion is in accord with judgments by other national and international scientific committees, based on somewhat older data. Currently, no alternative dose-response relationship appears more pragmatic or prudent for radiation protection purposes than the linear no-threshold model.
-
The aim of the study is to investigate systematically the possible interactions between two types of stun guns and last-generation pacemakers and implantable defibrillators. Experimental measurements were performed on pacemakers and implantable defibrillators from five leading manufacturers, considering the effect of stun gun dart positioning, sensing modality, stun gun shock duration, and defibrillation energy level. More than 300 measurements were collected. ⋯ For implantable defibrillators, in all cases, the stun guns triggered a ventricular fibrillation event detection. No risks resulted when the stun gun was used by a person wearing a pacemaker or an implantable defibrillator. This work provides novel and up-to-date evidence useful for the evaluation of risks to pacemaker/implantable defibrillator wearers due to stun guns.
-
The detonation of a nuclear weapon and the occurrence of a nuclear accident represent possible mass-casualty events with significant exposure to mixed neutron and gamma radiation fields in the first few minutes after the event with the ensuing fallout, extending for miles from the epicenter, that would result primarily in photon (gamma- and/or x-ray) exposure. Circulating biomarkers represent a crucial source of information in a mass-casualty radiation exposure triage scenario. We evaluated multiple blood biodosimetry and organ-specific biomarkers for early-response assessment of radiation exposure using a mouse (B6D2F1, males and females) total-body irradiation model exposed to Co gamma rays over a broad dose range (3-12 Gy) and dose rates of either 0.6 or 1.9 Gy min and compared the results with those obtained after exposure of mice to a mixed field (neutrons and gamma rays) using the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute Co gamma-ray source and TRIGA Mark F nuclear research reactor. ⋯ Blood was collected 1, 2, 4, and 7 d after total-body irradiation. Results from Co gamma-ray studies demonstrate: (1) significant dose- and time-dependent reductions in circulating mature hematopoietic cells; (2) dose- and time-dependent changes in fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand, interleukins IL-5, IL-10, IL-12, and IL-18, granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, thrombopoietin, erythropoietin, acute-phase proteins (serum amyloid A and lipopolysaccharide binding protein), surface plasma neutrophil (CD45) and lymphocyte (CD27) markers, ratio of CD45 to CD27, procalcitonin but not in intestinal fatty acid binding protein; (3) no significant differences were observed between dose-rate groups in hematological and protein profiles (fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand, IL-5, IL-12, IL-18, erythropoietin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, CD27, CD45, and ratio of CD45 to CD27) for any radiation dose at any time after exposure (p > 0.148); (4) no significant differences were observed between sex groups in hematological and protein profiles (fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand, IL-18, erythropoietin, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, serum amyloid A, CD45) for any radiation dose at any time after exposure (p > 0.114); and (5) PCT level significantly increased (p < 0.008) in mice irradiated with 12 Gy on day 7 post-total-body irradiation without significant differences between groups irradiated at dose rates of either 0.6 or 1.9 Gy min (p > 0.287). Radiation-quality comparison results demonstrate that: (1) equivalent doses of pure gamma rays and mixed-field radiation do not produce equivalent biological effects, and hematopoietic syndrome occurs at lower doses of mixed-field radiation; (2) ratios of hematological and protein biomarker means in the Co study compared to mixed-field studies using 2× Co doses vs. 1× TRIGA radiation doses (i.e., 3 Gy Co vs. 1.5 Gy TRIGA) ranged from roughly 0.2 to as high as 26.5 but 57% of all ratios fell within 0.7 and 1.3; and (3) in general, biomarker results are in agreement with the relative biological effectiveness = 1.95 (Dn/Dt = 0.67) reported earlier by Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute scientists in mouse survival countermeasure studies.
-
The emergency responder community trains for and responds to many types of incidents on a daily basis and has done so for years. This experience with fires, emergency medical calls, chemical spills, confined spaces, and other common calls for assistance has helped responders develop an understanding of the problems and a confidence in solving them. Radiation from an accidental release in a facility or during transportation, or from a terrorist incident that causes radioactive materials to be released from their containment vessel, remains a cause of concern and fear. ⋯ All of this information and support comes to the responder community separately, and it is left to the local-level planners to piece it together. It needs to be coordinated and communicated as one source. Communications remains the top challenge for the responder community as we look to the new administration for a plan for radiological and nuclear preparedness: communicating public messaging on radiation terminology, how members of the public can protect themselves and expected public agency actions; communicating a coordinated response plan that includes all levels and agencies; communicating the necessary training; andcommunicating the recovery actions that will have to take place.
-
This study was conducted as part of an endeavor to improve the risk management system of radiation therapy departments in the Republic of Korea. An online survey on the status and perception of Korea's medical physicists on risk management in radiation therapy was carried out. A total of 40 domestic radiation oncology departments participated. ⋯ Based on the results of the survey, the conclusions that can be derived are (1) the majority of respondents have a high interest in the risk management of radiation therapy; (2) the lack of staffing is one cause of risk management difficulties; (3) a risk-related terminology and classification system at the national or professional association level are required; (4) each hospital should create a voluntary reporting system for the handling of incidents; (5) medical physicists should establish incident reporting, analysis and countermeasures; and (6) government should develop education and training programs. It was confirmed that the current risk management system should be changed by education in the hospital and at the national level in order to improve risk management related to radiation therapy. In addition, it was recognized that a dedicated staff and a risk management certification system and organization for patient safety in radiotherapy are needed.