Lancet
-
Comparative Study
Should paediatric intensive care be centralised? Trent versus Victoria.
The mortality rate is lower among children admitted to specialist paediatric intensive care units (ICUs) than among those admitted to mixed adult and paediatric units in non-tertiary hospitals. In the UK, however, few children receive intensive care in specialist paediatric units. We compared the ICU mortality rate in children from the area the Trent Health Authority, UK, with the rate in children from Victoria, Australia, where paediatric intensive care is highly centralised. ⋯ If Trent is representative of the whole country, there are 453 (200-720) excess deaths a year in the UK that are probably due to suboptimal results from paediatric intensive care. If the ratio of paediatric ICUs to children were the same in the UK as in Victoria, there would be only 12 paediatric ICUs in the country. Our findings suggest that substantial reductions in mortality could be achieved if every UK child who needed endotracheal intubation for more than 12-24 h were admitted to one of 12 large specialist paediatric ICUs.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Randomised trial of oral and intravenous methylprednisolone in acute relapses of multiple sclerosis.
An intravenous rather than oral course of methylprednisolone is often prescribed for treating acute relapses in multiple sclerosis (MS) despite the lack of evidence to support this route of administration. Our double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial was designed to compare the efficacy of commonly used intravenous and oral steroid regimens in promoting recovery from acute relapses in MS. ⋯ Since our study did not show any clear advantage of the intravenous regime we conclude that it is preferable to prescribe oral rather than intravenous steroids for acute relapses in MS for reasons of patient convenience, safety, and cost.
-
The value of routine skull radiography as a method of predicting intracranial injury is controversial. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of skull radiography by prospectively studying head-injured children admitted to a children's hospital that serves an urban population. ⋯ In children, severe intracranial injury can occur in the absence of skull fracture. Skull radiography is not a reliable predictor of intracranial injury and is indicated only to confirm or exclude a suspected depressed fracture or penetrating injury, and when non-accidental injury is suspected, including in all infants younger than 2 years. Clinical neurological abnormalities are a reliable predictor of intracranial injury. If imaging is required, it should be with CT and not skull radiography.