Cancer treatment reviews
-
Cancer treatment reviews · Feb 2004
Review Meta Analysis Comparative StudyThe value of FDG-PET in the detection, grading and response to therapy of soft tissue and bone sarcomas; a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Sarcomas represent a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge that requires techniques to provide better assessment of the disease than provided by traditional means. FDG-PET depicts the increased metabolism in abnormal tissues, enabling visualisation and quantification in vivo. The objective of this review was to assess the diagnostic value of FDG-PET in the detection, grading and therapy response of soft tissue and bone sarcomas. ⋯ The meta-analysis in this study was limited by the fact that only a few studies had mutual comparable outcome parameters. Moreover, the methodological quality of the studies was generally poor. Nevertheless, our results indicate that FDG-PET can discriminate between sarcomas and benign tumours and low and high grade sarcomas based on the mean SUV. The diagnostic implications of these results have to be investigated, especially the discrimination between benign tumours and low grade sarcomas. Based on this meta-analysis, there is no indication to use FDG-PET in the standard treatment of sarcomas. In the future PET imaging in bone and soft tissue sarcomas should be directed to the clinical implication for the detection and grading of sarcomas and the treatment evaluation of locally advanced sarcomas.
-
Cancer treatment reviews · Feb 2004
ReviewEpidermal growth factor receptor: a promising target in solid tumours.
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is expressed in a wide variety of solid tumours. It has been demonstrated that the EGFR-associated signaling pathway plays an important role in carcinogenesis and cancer progression. ⋯ Many of these strategies have demonstrated efficacy against EGFR-expressing tumour cells in preclinical studies, prompting a large number of clinical trials. In particular, clinical studies using monoclonal antibody blockade and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors have suggested that EGFR blockade is a well-tolerated and effective treatment strategy; however, more trials are needed to precisely define how these agents will fit into modern cancer care.
-
Cancer treatment reviews · Dec 2003
ReviewPrevention of chemotherapy and radiation toxicity with glutamine.
Malignancy produces a state of physiologic stress that is characterized by a relative deficiency of glutamine, a condition that is further exacerbated by the effects of cancer treatment. Glutamine deficiency may impact on normal tissue tolerance to antitumor treatment, and may lead to dose reductions and compromised treatment outcome. Providing supplemental glutamine during cancer treatment has the potential to abrogate treatment-related toxicity. We reviewed the available data on the use of glutamine to decrease the incidence and severity of adverse effects due to chemotherapy and/or radiation in cancer patients. ⋯ The role of glutamine in the prevention of chemotherapy and radiation-induced toxicity is evolving. Glutamine supplementation is inexpensive and it may reduce the incidence of gastrointestinal, neurologic, and possibly cardiac complications of cancer therapy. Further studies, particularly placebo-controlled phase III trials, are needed to define its role in chemotherapy-induced toxicity.
-
Cancer treatment reviews · Oct 2003
Review Comparative StudyThe risks and benefits of hormonal replacement therapy in healthy women and in breast cancer survivors.
For many years hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) has been considered to offer not only effective relief of climacteric symptoms but also a reduction in the risk of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease, plus a possible prevention of cognitive decline. Randomised trials of HRT in women with preexisting coronary heart disease have not confirmed, however, cardiovascular benefits of HRT and have even suggested increased cardiac risk associated with this management. Numerous retrospective studies demonstrated that the risk of breast cancer is higher in HRT-users and is related to therapy duration. ⋯ HRT also increases the relative risk of endometrial cancer, particularly if oestrogen alone is administered. Currently, the indications for HRT in healthy subjects should include only reduction of menopausal symptoms and prevention of osteoporosis. The use of HRT in breast cancer survivors is controversial, and until the results from prospective randomised trials are available, cannot be recommended in this group as a standard care.
-
Cancer treatment reviews · Jun 2003
Are patients with cancer receiving adequate treatment for thrombosis? Results from FRONTLINE.
The current practice of clinicians worldwide in the treatment of venous thromboembolism was assessed via responses to the FRONTLINE survey. Significant regional differences in practice were noted. ⋯ Oral anticoagulants were favoured for long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism, particularly in Western Europe and North America. Case study reports from the survey revealed that a substantial proportion of patients with cancer had been perceived to be at low risk of thrombosis, had consequently not received thromboprophylaxis and developed VTE.