Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
-
The drugs prescribed for 280 women with hip fractures (mean age 83 years) were compared with those prescribed for 145 women controls (mean age 81 years) as recorded in a family practice age-sex register. Thirty-three percent of the fracture patients were taking diuretics compared with 24% of the controls (.10 greater than P greater than .05). Forty-six percent of these diuretics taken by the fracture group (compared with 40% taken by the controls) were either loop or potassium sparing diuretics in combination with another diuretic. ⋯ Thus, this population did not confirm a previously identified association between long-acting sedatives and the risk of fracture. As only 3.5% of fracture patients and 2.1% controls were receiving phenothiazines, a role for these drugs in hip fracture cannot be ruled out. In summary, hip fracture patients were slightly more likely to be taking diuretics and somewhat less likely to be taking NSAIDs than controls but there were no differences with respect to other drugs.
-
A peculiar dynamic in communication exists between those who are most likely to be involved in life-prolongation decisions. We found that both the elderly and health care professionals talk about life-prolongation, but not with one another; that they consider some of the same factors as they think about the life-prolongation decision; and that most of them believe physicians should be responsible for initiating discussion. ⋯ The patient remains patient, waiting--with fears of dependency, memories of previous life-threatening experiences, and deep sensitivity for suffering--for the physician to initiate the discussion. Is a mediator such as a family member necessary in these situations? Is the hospital environment not conductive to discussion of less than heroic efforts?
-
Letter Case Reports
Pneumothorax complicating small-bore nasogastric feeding tube insertion.
-
Comparative Study
The impact of age on utilization of intensive care resources.
The impact of age on admission practices and pattern of care were examined in 599 admissions to a medical intensive care unit (MICU) and 290 patients on the conventional medical care divisions of the same hospital. Four age groups were compared: under 55, 55 to 64, 65 to 74, and 75 years of age and over. Severity of illness and prior health were assessed using the Acute Physiology Score (APS) and the Chronic Health Evaluation (CHE) instruments. ⋯ Still, elderly DNR patients received as much resources as younger DNR patients and this was more than non-DNR patients. The sample of patients treated on conventional medical divisions had age distribution similar to the MICU sample. There was some evidence that admission APS (median, 5, 5, 6, 6, respectively, P = .055) and maximum APS (median, 5, 5, 7, 8, respectively, P = .023) differed slightly across age groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)