Pain
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Codeine 20 mg increases pain relief from ibuprofen 400 mg after third molar surgery. A repeat-dosing comparison of ibuprofen and an ibuprofen-codeine combination.
A combination of 20 mg codeine base and ibuprofen 400 mg was compared with ibuprofen 400 mg in a randomised double-blind cross-over study of multiple doses in 25 patients after 2-stage bilateral third molar removal. The combination produced significantly greater pain relief and doubled the hours of minimum pain intensity and maximal relief on the day of surgery. ⋯ There was no significant increase in side-effect incidence with the combination. The 30% increase in analgesic effect may be of clinical benefit, and this trial design, cross-over with multiple dosing in out-patients, may be a sensitive test for analgesics, potentially more predictive of side-effect problems than single-dose studies.
-
Case Reports
An unusual case of causalgia. Relevance to recent hypothesis on mechanism of causalgia.
Intravenous regional sympathetic block with guanethidine caused only limited improvement in a patient with longstanding causalgia. Lumbar sympathetic block with phenol also had little direct effect on the pain but completely abolished associated allodynia and vasomotor signs. ⋯ This improvement persisted even after 8 months when there was some return of the previous allodynia and vasomotor signs (to involve a smaller area than previously). The case would appear to have implications for a recently proposed hypothesis concerning the mechanism of pain in causalgia.
-
In the first part of the study 20 subjects (11 headache, 9 normals) free-sorted descriptors from the intensity and affect scales of the Tursky pain perception profile (PPP) into groups on the basis of similar meaning. In part 2 they made similarity ratings of all pairs of words within the intensity and affect scales. In the third part of the study subjects completed a cross-modal matching task to scale the intensity and affect words. ⋯ An MDS analysis showed that the groups could be located in 2-dimensional space in which the dimensions of intensity and affective distress could be easily discerned. When the descriptors from the intensity and affect scales were rated within each scale, a second MDS analysis showed that, whereas the intensity descriptors could be fitted by a 1-dimensional representation, the affect descriptors required a 3-dimensional model. There was evidence that subjects with extensive pain experience placed greater weight on the second and third affective dimensions compared with relatively pain-free subjects.
-
The use of strategies for coping with chronic pain was assessed by means of the Coping Strategy Questionnaire (CSQ) in a Dutch sample of 108 chronic low back pain (LBP) patients referred for behavioral treatment. The 3 factors of the CSQ were related to measurements of behavioral and emotional adjustment to LBP above and beyond the effects of demographic and medical status variables. Especially patients high on the factor Helplessness reported higher levels of pain, functional impairment, anxiety, depression and psychoneuroticism, while patients high on the factor Perceived Control reported lower levels of pain, functional impairment and also manifested a higher level of uptime. The causal role of coping strategies in adjustment to pain, the selectivity of focusing on LBP patients selected through referral and implications for pain management are discussed.