Pain
-
Visceral pain processing is abnormal in a majority of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. Aberrant endogenous nociceptive modulation and anticipation are possible underlying mechanisms investigated in the current study. Twelve IBS patients and 12 matched healthy controls underwent brain fMRI scanning during the following randomised stimuli: sham and painful rectal distensions by barostat without and with simultaneous activation of endogenous descending nociceptive inhibition using ice water immersion of the foot for heterotopic stimulation. ⋯ In conclusion, IBS patients showed dysfunctional endogenous inhibition of pain and concomitant aberrant activation of brain areas involved in pain processing and integration. Anticipation of rectal pain was associated with different brain activation patterns in IBS involving multiple interoceptive, homeostatic, associative and emotional areas, even though pain scores were similar during sham distension. The aberrant activation of endogenous pain inhibition appears to involve circuitry relating to anticipation as well as pain processing itself.
-
The aims of this study were to explore: (a) the interrelation between spatial summation (SS) and spatial discrimination (SD) of pain, (b) whether the two phenomena are subserved by different sensory channels. SS and SD of pain were measured with contact heat stimuli delivered at slow (0.50 degrees C/s) and fast (40 degrees C/s) rise times. Pressure nerve block of the radial nerve was employed to assess whether differential activation of C and A delta fibers is obtained by these different rates of rise. ⋯ Stimulation rate did not affect SS or SD. Following nerve block, thresholds obtained with the fast rise stimulation increased significantly (HPT rose from 46.2 to 50.5 degrees C) but those obtained with slow rise stimuli were not affected by the block, indicating that C and A delta fibers were activated selectively. The results suggest that: (a) SS and SD are mutually exclusive functions of the nociceptive systems, (b) C and A delta nociceptors are probably similarly involved in these functions.
-
Neuropathic pain is a major clinical problem unresolved by available therapeutics. Spinal cord glia play a pivotal role in neuropathic pain, via the release of proinflammatory cytokines. Anti-inflammatory cytokines, like interleukin-10 (IL-10), suppress proinflammatory cytokines. ⋯ This supports that spinal proinflammatory cytokines are important in both the initiation and maintenance of neuropathic pain. Importantly, pDNA-IL-10 gene therapy reversed mechanical allodynia induced by CCI, returning rats to normal pain responsiveness, without additional analgesia. Together, these data suggest that intrathecal IL-10 gene therapy may provide a novel approach for prolonged clinical pain control.
-
Lidocaine-like sodium channel blocking drugs provide pain relief either by interrupting impulse conduction in neurons when applied locally in high concentrations or, when given systemically, by suppressing high-frequency ectopic discharges due to preferential drug binding to inactivated channel states. Lidocaine-like actions of opioids have frequently been demonstrated clinically. However, drug binding to resting and inactivated channel conformations has been studied systematically only in the case of meperidine. ⋯ Sufentanil, fentanyl and tramadol but not morphine reversibly suppressed sodium inward currents at high concentrations (half-maximum blocking concentrations (IC50) 49+/-4, 141+/-6 and 103+/-8 microM) when depolarizations were started from hyperpolarized holding potentials. Short depolarizations inducing fast-inactivation and long prepulses inducing slow-inactivation significantly (*p < or = 0.001) increased the blocking potency for these opioids. 15% slow inactivated channels reduced the respective IC50 values to 5+/-3, 12+/-2 and 21+/-2 microM. These results show that: (1) Sufentanil, fentanyl and tramadol block voltage-gated sodium channels with half-maximum inhibitory concentrations similar to the IC50 reported for meperidine. (2) Slow inactivation--a physiological mechanism to suppress ectopic activity in response to slow shifts in membrane potential--increases binding affinity for sufentanil, fentanyl and tramadol. (3) Morphine has no such effects.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Gabapentin and postoperative pain--a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of perioperative gabapentin administration for the control of acute postoperative pain. We searched Medline (1966-2006), the Cochrane Library (2006), Scopus, CINAHL and bibliographies from clinical trials and review articles. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing gabapentin with inactive controls in surgical patients. ⋯ Cumulative 24 h opioid consumption was also lower (WMD, -7.25 mg). Gabapentin was associated with an increased risk of sedation (Peto OR 3.86; 95% CI 2.50-5.94) but less opioid-related side effects such as vomiting (Peto OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.39-0.86) and pruritus (Peto OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.10-0.74). In conclusion, gabapentin has an analgesic and opioid-sparing effect in acute postoperative pain management when used in conjunction with opioids.