Pain
-
Comparative Study
Principle components analysis of pain thresholds to thermal, electrical, and mechanical stimuli suggests a predominant common source of variance.
We addressed the question whether pain thresholds to different stimuli measure independent aspects of pain or one common phenomenon. In the first case, different stimuli are required to completely characterize a subject's pain sensitivity. In the second case, different stimuli are redundant and can be used to calculate composite scores across pain modalities. ⋯ Only minor variance components, each explaining <14% of the total variance, indicated a distinction of pain stimuli. There, a pattern of similarities and dissimilarities emerged agreeing with known distinct mechanisms of nociceptive responses to different stimuli. We conclude that characterizing a person as being generally stoical or complaining to any painful stimulus appears to be justified at least at pain threshold level.
-
This study examined the effects of anxiety and depression on pain in women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n=82) or osteoarthritis (OA; n=88). Anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed at the beginning of the study. Arthritis pain, interpersonal stress, negative affect, and positive affect were assessed weekly for 11 consecutive weeks. ⋯ When entered together into the prediction equations, anxiety alone was still related to elevations in current and next week pain. In addition, anxiety alone was indirectly related to current pain through negative affect and depression alone was indirectly related to current pain through positive affect. These results highlight the need for careful study of the differential effects of anxiety and depression and treatments that target their unique mechanisms.
-
Comparative Study
Touch or pain? Spatio-temporal patterns of cortical fMRI activity following brief mechanical stimuli.
Most imaging studies on the human pain system have concentrated so far on the spatial distribution of pain-related activity. In the present study, we investigated similarities and differences between the spatial and temporal patterns of brain activity related to touch vs. pain perception. To this end, we adopted an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigm allowing us to separately assess the activity related to stimulus anticipation, perception, and coding. ⋯ Significant decreases in fMRI signals following both tactile and painful stimuli were found in perigenual cingulate (pACC)/medial prefrontal cortex (MPF) and in the posterior cingulate/precuneus/paracentral lobule; more intense decreases were found in the pACC/MPF following painful stimuli. fMRI signal increases in the contralateral insula and in aMCC, but not in the parietal cortex, were more prolonged following painful than tactile stimuli. Moreover, a second peak of signal increases (albeit of lower intensity) was found in anterior insula and aMCC during pain intensity rating. These results show specific spatio-temporal patterns of cortical activity related to processing noxious vs. non-noxious mechanical stimuli.
-
Comparative Study
Peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor agonist attenuates neuropathic pain in rats after L5 spinal nerve injury.
Studies in experimental models and controlled patient trials indicate that opioids are effective in managing neuropathic pain. However, side effects secondary to their central nervous system actions present barriers to their clinical use. Therefore, we examined whether activation of the peripheral mu-opioid receptors (MORs) could effectively alleviate neuropathic pain in rats after L5 spinal nerve ligation (SNL). ⋯ Ipsilateral intraplantar injection of loperamide also dose-dependently (10-100 microg/50 microl) reversed mechanical allodynia on day 7 post-SNL. We suggest that loperamide can effectively attenuate neuropathic pain, primarily through activation of peripheral MORs in local tissue. Therefore, peripherally acting MOR agonists may represent a promising therapeutic approach for alleviating neuropathic pain.
-
Comparative Study
Neuropathic pain: are there distinct subtypes depending on the aetiology or anatomical lesion?
Neuropathic pain can be caused by a variety of nerve lesions and it is unsettled whether it should be categorised into distinct clinical subtypes depending on aetiology or type of nerve lesion or individualised as a specific group, based on common symptomatology across aetiologies. In this study, we used a multivariate statistical method (multiple correspondence analyses) to investigate associations between neuropathic positive symptoms (assessed with a specific questionnaire, the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory [NPSI]) and aetiologies, types of nerve lesion and pain localisations. We also examined the internal structure of the NPSI and its relevance to evaluation of symptoms of evoked pains by exploring their relationships with clinician-based quantified measures of allodynia and hyperalgesia. ⋯ Multiple correspondence analyses indicated few associations between symptoms (or dimensions) and aetiologies, types of lesions, or pain localisations. Exceptions included idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia and postherpetic neuralgia. We found that there are more similarities than differences in the neuropathic positive symptoms associated with a large variety of peripheral and central lesions, providing rationale for subgrouping aetiologically diverse neuropathic patients into a specific multidimensional category for therapeutic management.