Pain
-
Damage to peripheral nerves causes significant remodeling of peripheral innervation and can lead to neuropathic pain. Most nociceptive primary afferents are unmyelinated (C fibers) and subdivided into peptidergic and nonpeptidergic fibers. Previous studies have found nerve injury in the trigeminal system to induce changes in small-diameter primary afferent innervation and cause significant autonomic sprouting into the upper dermis of the lower-lip skin of the rat. ⋯ These changes were associated with significant increase in glial-derived nerve growth factor levels in the lower-lip skin. While IB4-saporin treatment had no effect on evoked mechanical thresholds when von Frey hairs were applied to the lower-lip skin, ablation of nonpeptidergic fibers in a chronic constriction injury model caused significant sympathetic and parasympathetic fiber sprouting, and led to an exacerbated pain response. This was an unexpected finding, as it has been suggested that nonpeptidergic fibers play a major role in mechanical pain, and suggests that these fibers play a complex role in the development of neuropathic pain.
-
Sleep disturbance and pain catastrophizing are important mediators of the chronic pain experience. To date, these factors have not been considered concurrently despite compelling theoretical rationale to do so. In the present study, we examined whether pain catastrophizing not only has direct effects on clinical pain and pain-related interference, but also indirect effects through its association with sleep disturbance. ⋯ Prospective studies are needed to examine lagged associations between these constructs. These findings have important theoretical and clinical implications. Critically, interventions that reduce pain catastrophizing may concurrently improve sleep and clinical pain.
-
Comparative Study
How efficient is the orienting of spatial attention to pain? An experimental investigation.
This study investigated how efficient spatial attention was oriented to pain in 2 experiments. Participants detected whether painful (pain group) or nonpainful (control group) somatosensory stimuli were delivered to the left or right hand. Each stimulus was preceded by a visual cue presented near to the stimulated hand (valid trial), the opposite hand (invalid trial), or centrally between hands. ⋯ This effect was due to faster responses on valid relative to baseline trials (engagement), rather than slower responses on invalid relative to baseline trials (disengagement), and was significantly correlated with self-reported bodily threat. In experiment 2, prioritization of the pain location was probably overridden by task strategies because it was advantageous for participants' task performance to attend to the cued location irrespective of whether stimulation was painful or not. Implications of these findings for theories of hypervigilance and attentional management of pain are discussed.