Pain
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Ethnicity interacts with the OPRM1 gene in experimental pain sensitivity.
Robust interindividual variation in pain sensitivity has been observed, and recent evidence suggests that some of the variability may be genetically mediated. Our previous data revealed significantly higher pressure pain thresholds among individuals possessing the minor G allele of the A118G SNP of the mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) compared with those with 2 consensus alleles. Moreover, ethnic differences in pain sensitivity have been widely reported. ⋯ The reasons for this dichotomy are unclear; they may involve ethnic differences in haplotypic structure, or A118G may be a tag-SNP linked to other functional polymorphisms. These findings demonstrate an ethnicity-dependent association of OPRM1 genotype with pain sensitivity. Additional research is warranted to uncover the mechanisms influencing these relationships.
-
Comparative Study
A comparison of four self-report scales of pain intensity in 6- to 8-year-old children.
There are many different instruments for assessing pain intensity in children, but the agreement between them is unclear. The aims of this study were to determine the 1-dimensionality of 4 widely used self-report scales for measuring the intensity of pediatric pain, and the agreement between them. A sample of 126 school children between 6 and 8 years of age (mean = 6.87 years; SD = 0.68 year) were interviewed individually and asked to identify the most frequent pain that they had experienced in the 3 months before the interview, and to report their maximum pain intensity using all 4 scales (Visual Analogue Scale, Coloured Analogue Scale, Faces Pain Scale-Revised and Numerical Rating Scale-11). ⋯ Our data show the 1-dimensionality of the scales. The 95% limits of agreement between each pair of measures were as follows: VAS/CAS (-23.8, 23.4); VAS/NRS-11 (-41, 31.1); VAS/FPS-R (-38.3, 33.6); CAS/NRS-11 (-35.6, 26.2); CAS/FPS-R (-36.4, 32.1), and FPS-R/NRS-11 (-36.3, 31). Our data suggest that these 4 instruments measure 1 common factor but that they are not concordant.
-
Multicenter Study
Parents who catastrophize about their child's pain prioritize attempts to control pain.
How parents respond to their child in pain is critically important to how both parent and child attempt to cope with pain. We examined the influence of parental catastrophic thinking about child pain on their prioritization for pain control. Using a vignette methodology, parents reported, in response to different pain scenarios, on their imagined motivation for 2 competing goals: to control their child's pain (ie, pain control) or to encourage their child's participation in daily activities (ie, activity engagement). ⋯ Furthermore, independently of parental catastrophic thoughts, heightened priority for pain control was observed in highly intense and chronic pain situations. Moreover, in highly intense pain, priority for pain control was stronger for mothers compared with fathers. Theoretical and clinical implications and directions for future research are discussed.
-
Numerous behavioral pain measures have been validated for young children, but none is appropriate to assess pain in emergency departments (EDs), where caregivers need a simple, easily completed scale. Our objective was to elaborate and validate a tool, relevant in any painful situation, with agitation or prostration, and for any age under 7 years. Five items (scored 0 to 3) were developed by pediatric pain and emergency caregivers. ⋯ Interrater reliability was excellent between nurses and researcher (weighted kappa 0.7 to 0.9), and in a group of 6 nurses (simultaneous assessment of 122 videos). The treatment threshold was determined at 4 of 15. EVENDOL has excellent validity and can be used for all children under age 7 in EDs, for any age and any pain, acute as well as more prolonged.