Contributions to nephrology
-
Chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly coexist, and data suggest that renal patients have AF rates in excess of double that encountered in the general population. These patients are at increased risk of stroke, regardless of the presence or absence of AF. Furthermore, a lower GFR causes increased thromboembolic risk in patients with AF - independent of other risk factors. ⋯ The new oral anticoagulants have relatively little data in patients with severe renal impairment, and all have an element of renal excretion. There is a need for large randomised control trials in patients with renal insufficiency and on haemodialysis to provide a bank of high-quality scientific data on which clinicians can base their management decisions. Until then, we must adopt a pragmatic approach which involves careful consideration of the relative risk of stroke and bleeding in each individual patient.
-
Various drugs have been used for the treatment of focal segmental glomerular sclerosis (FSGS) or minimal change disease (idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, INS) including methylprednisolone pulses, alkylating agents and calcineurin inhibitors, often without a strong rationale. For some drugs the rationale has been recently provided by the identification of mechanisms regulating proteinuria. The characterization of molecules acting as permeability factors, including hemopexin, soluble urokinase receptor and cardiotrophin-like cytokine-1, supports plasma exchange in severe cases of INS, particularly in patients at high risk of recurrence of FSGS after transplantation. ⋯ Using saquinavir associated with small doses of calcineurin inhibitors, we treated a small series of very difficult cases of INS with insufficient response to steroid therapy and multiple immunosuppressive drugs. Saquinavir allowed a significant reduction of steroid cumulative doses and disappearance of features of steroid toxicity. In conclusion, recent reports have allowed a new insight into the pathogenetical mechanism regulating proteinuria in INS, offering new targets for treating severe cases.
-
Pathophysiological mechanisms of cardiorenal syndromes (CRS) types 1-5 are still sparsely characterized. In an attempt to address this issue, a consensus conference on CRS was held in Venice, Italy, in November 2012 under the auspices of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI). ⋯ Pre-conference we performed a systematic search and review of the available literature using a modified Delphi analysis. Hereby identified and in this review discussed questions were: (i) What are the predominant pathophysiologic mechanisms of CRS type 1 in acute decompensated heart failure? (ii) Could biomarker profiling identify pathomechanisms or hemodynamic phenotype of patients with CRS type 1? Could predictive biomarkers improve renal safety of therapy in CRS type 1? (iii) How do the timing, severity and duration relate to the mechanisms and outcomes of CRS type 1? In summary, after discussion and appraisal of the best available evidence, working group 1 makes consensus recommendations for future research on pathologic mechanisms of CRS type 1 and recommendations for clinical practice where treatment is in either proof or disproof of a mechanism.
-
Acute kidney injury (AKI) commonly occurs in hospitalized patients and is independently and strongly associates with morbidity and mortality. The clinical benefits of a timely and definitive diagnosis of AKI have not been fully realized due to limitations imposed by the use of serum creatinine and urine output to fulfill diagnostic criteria. These restrictions often lead to diagnostic delays, potential misclassification of actual injury status, and provide little information regarding underlying cause. ⋯ Promising diagnostic injury markers include neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), interleukin 18 (IL-18) and liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP). However, there are currently insufficient data on damage biomarkers to support their use for AKI staging. Rigorous validation studies measuring the association between the novel damage biomarker(s) and clinically relevant outcomes are needed.