Contributions to nephrology
-
During critical illness, reductions in renal blood flow (RBF) are believed to be a major cause of kidney dysfunction, and therapy is often aimed at restoration of RBF. Despite this, our ability to measure RBF during critical illness has been limited by the invasiveness of the available techniques. Ciné Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CPC-MRI) represents an entirely noninvasive, contrast-free method of measuring blood flow with the potential of enabling the measurement of blood flow to major organs including the kidney. We have recently assessed the feasibility of measuring RBF by means of CPC-MRI in 2 critically ill patients with septic acute kidney injury and were able to compare such measurements to those obtained in a normal volunteer.
-
Different definitions for acute kidney injury (AKI) once posed an important impediment to research. The RIFLE consensus classification was the first universally accepted definition for AKI, and has facilitated a much better understanding of the epidemiology of this condition. The RIFLE classification was adapted by a broad platform of world societies, the Acute Kidney Injury Network group, as the preferred AKI diagnostic and staging system. ⋯ Renal replacement therapy is necessary in approximately 2% of this cohort. AKI that occurs within a 7-day period after cardiac surgery is related to perioperative risk factors, such as preexisting chronic kidney disease, acute ischemia, aorta cross-clamping, or use of cardiopulmonary bypass. AKI that occurs after the first week is mostly a consequence of sepsis or heart failure.
-
Blood purification in critical care can perform 2 main functions: as an artificial support for failing organs (such as artificial kidney or liver support) and as a remover of causative humoral mediators of critical illness (such as severe sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome). As an artificial kidney, continuous blood purification (such as continuous hemofiltration and continuous hemodiafiltration, CHDF) is widely applied in intensive care units. The intensity of renal replacement therapy, however, has been reported to have no impact upon the efficacy of the blood purification in terms of clinical outcome. ⋯ However, our understanding of the pathophysiology of sepsis has changed since the concept of pattern recognition receptors and pathogen-associated molecular patterns was introduced. According to this, CHDF with a cytokine-adsorbing polymethylmethacrylate membrane hemofilter is preferable and more effective than direct hemoperfusion with an endotoxin-adsorbing polymyxin-B immobilized column in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock. Blood purification in critical care is gaining popularity, and is widely for both renal and non-renal indications.
-
Fluid overload may occur in patients with heart failure. Further complications may arise when cardiorenal syndromes develop and the kidneys are unable to eliminate the accumulated fluid. Diuretics represent the fist line of treatment, although in some case they may be ineffective or even dangerous for the patient. ⋯ Then, an evaluation of biomarkers of heart failure and a careful analysis of body fluid composition by bioimpedance vector analysis should be carried out to establish the level of hydration and to guide fluid removal strategies. Last but not least, an adequate extracorporeal technique should be employed to remove excess fluid. Preference should be given to continuous forms of ultrafiltration (slow continuous ultrafiltration, continuous venovenous hemofiltration); these techniques guided by a continuous monitoring of circulating blood volume allow for an adequate restoration of body fluid composition minimizing hemodynamic complications and worsening of renal function especially during episodes of acute decompensated heart failure.
-
Review Case Reports
Diuretic therapy in fluid-overloaded and heart failure patients.
Diuretics are the most commonly used drugs to treat clinically diagnosed fluid overload in patients with heart failure. There is no conclusive evidence that they alter major outcomes such as survival to hospital discharge or time in hospital compared to other therapies. However, they demonstrably achieve fluid removal in the majority of patients, restore dry body weight, improve the breathlessness of pulmonary edema and are unlikely to be subjected to a large double-blind randomized controlled trial in this setting because of lack of equipoise. ⋯ Such therapy often requires more intensive monitoring than available in medical wards. If diuretic therapy fails to achieve its clinical goals, ultrafiltration by semipermeable membranes is reliably effective in achieving targeted fluid removal. The combination of diuretic therapy and/or ultrafiltration can achieve volume control in essentially all patients with heart failure.