International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
-
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. · Sep 2000
Comparative StudyPostimplantation dosimetric analysis of permanent transperineal prostate implantation: improved dose distributions with an intraoperative computer-optimized conformal planning technique.
To compare the target coverage and dose to normal tissues after I-125 transperineal permanent implantation (TPI) of the prostate in 90 patients treated with one of three different transperineal techniques. ⋯ Three-dimensional intraoperative computer optimized TPI consistently provided superior target coverage with the prescription dose and significantly lower urethral doses compared to two other techniques used. These data provide proof-of-principle that improved therapeutic ratios can be achieved with the integration of more sophisticated intraoperative planning for TPI and may potentially have a profound impact on the outcome of patients treated with this modality.
-
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. · Aug 2000
Is radiation alone adequate treatment to the axilla for patients with limited axillary surgery? Implications for treatment after a positive sentinel node biopsy.
To estimate the possible efficacy of axillary radiation therapy (AXRT) following a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB), we evaluated the risk of regional nodal failure (RNF) for patients with clinical Stage I or II, clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer treated with either no dissection or a limited dissection (LD) defined as removal of 5 nodes or less followed by AXRT. ⋯ These results imply that AXRT may be an effective and safe alternative to completion dissection for treatment of the axilla following a positive SNB. Further studies comparing these two options in specific patient subgroups are needed.
-
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. · Aug 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialImportance of the mini-mental status examination in the treatment of patients with brain metastases: a report from the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 91-04.
Little information is available on the importance of pretreatment Mini-Mental Status Exam (MMSE) on long-term survival and neurologic function following treatment for unresectable brain metastases. This study examines the importance of the MMSE in predicting outcome in a group of patients treated with an accelerated fractionation regimen of 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions in 2 weeks. ⋯ While gender and perhaps age remain significant predictors for survival, MMSE is also an important way of assessing a patient's outcome. Accelerated fractionation used in the treatment of brain metastases (30 Gy in 10 fractions) appears to also be associated with an improvement in MMSE and a lack of decline of MMSE below 23 in long-term survivors.
-
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. · Aug 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialA Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) phase III randomized study to compare hyperfractionation and two variants of accelerated fractionation to standard fractionation radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: first report of RTOG 9003.
The optimal fractionation schedule for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer has been controversial. The objective of this randomized trial was to test the efficacy of hyperfractionation and two types of accelerated fractionation individually against standard fractionation. ⋯ Hyperfractionation and accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost are more efficacious than standard fractionation for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Acute but not late effects are also increased.
-
Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. · Aug 2000
Comparative StudyFailure-free survival following brachytherapy alone or external beam irradiation alone for T1-2 prostate tumors in 2222 patients: results from a single practice.
To evaluate failure-free survival (FFS) for brachytherapy (BT) alone compared to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) alone for Stage T1-2 Nx-No Mo patients over the same time period by a single community-based practice in the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) era. ⋯ In our patient population, either EBRT or BT appear equally efficacious for patients with T1/T2 disease with Gleason scores = 6 or PSA = 10 ng/dL. Patients with presenting Gleason scores of 8-10 or PSA > 10 ng/dL (but = 20 ng/dL) appear to fare significantly worse with BT alone compared to EBRT alone. Neither EBRT nor BT alone was particularly effective for patients with a presenting PSA > 20 ng/dL, as would be anticipated from the significant risks of occult distant metastasis in this group. To our knowledge, this is the first report comparing the outcome of EBRT and BT treatment in patients treated concurrently by a single group, and these results, achieved in a community-based practice, compare favorably to data from academic centers regarding external beam, brachytherapy, or surgical outcomes and should be generalizable to the community at large.