Journal of advanced nursing
-
This is the second of two linked papers exploring decision making in nursing. The first paper, 'Classifying clinical decision making: a unifying approach' investigated difficulties with applying a range of decision-making theories to nursing practice. This is due to the diversity of terminology and theoretical concepts used, which militate against nurses being able to compare the outcomes of decisions analysed within different frameworks. ⋯ This is particularly important as nurses' roles continue to expand to embrace elements of managerial, medical and therapeutic work. Analysing nurses' decisions as classification behaviour will also enhance clinical effectiveness, and assist in making nurses' expertise more visible. In addition, the classification framework explodes the myth that intuition, traditionally associated with nurses' decision making, is less rational and scientific than other approaches.
-
Comparative Study
English nursing and medical students' attitudes towards organ donation.
The purpose of the study reported in this paper was to examine nursing and medical students' attitudes towards organ and corneal donation. A sample of 72 nursing and medical degree students from a British University, completed a 61-item self-administered quantitative questionnaire, adapted by Kent and Owens (1995) from an original tool devised by Parisi and Katz (1986). The findings revealed that all but one of the respondents had an overall positive attitude towards organ donation; a significant relationship was found to exist between the extent of this positive attitude held by each student and their personal willingness to donate organs. ⋯ Overall, the study revealed that although this group of student nurses seem to be in favour of organ donation, with many willing to sign a donor card, doubts still exist in the medical student group. Further work is required to understand this phenomena. A comparison of the data with an earlier study completed by Kent and Owens (1995) indicate that student nurses may have a more positive orientation to donation than qualified staff.
-
This study investigates how cancer patients who receive care from community specialist palliative care (CSPC) nurses differ from those who do not. This was achieved by secondary data analyses from the Regional Study of Care for the Dying, a retrospective interview survey of deaths in 1990 in 20 nationally representative health districts. Interviews were obtained for 2,074/2,915 (71%) of randomly selected cancer deaths; 574 (27.8%) were reported to have received care from a Macmillan nurse, hospice home-care nurse, or other community specialist palliative care nurse. ⋯ Having a lymphoma, leukaemia or myeloma, a brain tumour and being dependent on others for help with self-care for more than 1 year decreased the likelihood. The use of CSPC nurses to provide expertise in symptom control and to support families of dependent patients is consistent with the aims of palliative care, and therefore appears appropriate. Further research is, however, needed to investigate the apparent age bias in access to these services, and to ensure that CSPC services are provided on the basis of need, irrespective of patient age.