Spine
-
Methodological. ⋯ It was concluded that the SRS-30 Turkish questionnaire was valid and reliable in evaluating the treatment of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Considering the studies related to SRS scales in the literature, especially those applied Rasch analysis, it is seen that the reply categories of the items should be reviewed.Level of Evidence: 2.
-
A retrospective comparison of the surgical outcome after cervical laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) using a modified K-line based on lordosis in neck extension as a predictor: in K-line Back CSM (KB group), the K-line crosses the ventral edge of any of the spinous processes, whereas in K-line Front CSM (KF group), the K-line does not. ⋯ The K-line Back predicts a poor neurological outcome after laminoplasty for CSM. Decompression with fusion may be recommended for these patients.Level of Evidence: 4.
-
Retrospective review of prospective case-control study. ⋯ This is the largest study comparing the surgical outcomes of MIS and PSF. MIS patients benefit from increased kyphosis, fewer transfusion, lower opioid consumption, and shorter hospital stay with similar Cobb correction. Increased postoperative kyphosis is likely from muscle sparing dissection in MIS.Level of Evidence: 3.
-
Retrospective analysis. ⋯ PSES patients with earlier diagnostic year (before 2010), larger tumor size (>59 mm), and lymph node invasion, are more likely to have metastasis. We developed a nomogram based on age, tumor extent, tumor size, and surgical treatments for determining the prognosis for patients with PSES, while more external patient cohorts are warranted for validation.Level of Evidence: 3.
-
RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RUAM) applied to chiropractic manipulation for patients with chronic low-back pain (CLBP) and chronic neck pain (CNP). ⋯ Chiropractors in this US sample tend to provide manipulation to very few patients with CLBP or CNP for which it is inappropriate. However, more research is needed to determine which patients with CNP benefit from manipulation.Level of Evidence: 4.