Intensive care medicine
-
Intensive care medicine · Dec 1999
Changing use of intensive care for hematological patients: the example of multiple myeloma.
Intensivists generally view patients with hematological malignancies as poor candidates for intensive care. Nevertheless, hematologists have recently developed more aggressive treatment protocols capable of achieving prolonged complete remissions in many of these patients. This change mandates a reappraisal of indications for ICU admission in each type of hematological disease. Improved knowledge of the prognosis is of assistance in making treatment decisions. ⋯ The prognosis for myeloma patients in the ICU is improving over time. This may reflect either recent therapeutic changes in hematological departments and ICUs or changes in patient selection for ICU admission. Hematologists and intensivists should work closely together to select hematological patients likely to benefit from ICU admission.
-
Intensive care medicine · Dec 1999
Multicenter StudyMulticentric study of monitoring alarms in the adult intensive care unit (ICU): a descriptive analysis.
To assess the relevance of current monitoring alarms as a warning system in the adult ICU. ⋯ The study confirms that the level of monitoring in ICUs generates a great number of false-positive alarms.
-
Intensive care medicine · Dec 1999
Comparative StudyStressors in ICU: perception of the patient, relatives and health care team.
To compare the evaluation of the stressors present in the intensive care unit (ICU) from the point of view of the patient, relatives and the multiprofessional team and to identify differences and similarities with regard to the perception of stressors in order to optimize patient care. ⋯ Being in pain, being unable to sleep and having tubes in the nose and/or mouth were pointed out as the major stressors by the three groups. There was no statistically significant correlation between the total stress scores of the patients and their relatives (r = 0.193), between the patients and the team (r = -0.002), or between the total scores of the team and the relatives (r = -0.185). The results suggest that the views of the relatives and the professional team concerning the stressors have some similar points compared to the evaluation made by the patient himself, although the intensity of the evaluation for each group corresponds to its own perception.