Der Internist
-
The clinical implementation of immunotherapy has broadened the therapeutic options for recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Until 2016, the only molecularly targeted therapy was epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blockade. However, immune checkpoint inhibition has recently become part of first-line treatment in recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC. ⋯ For recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC, the occurrence of systemic effects upon radiochemoimmunotherapy in the clinic is on the rise. Hence, the identification of biomarkers for abscopal effects of radiotherapy and unexpected synergisms between chemotherapy and immunotherapy as well as for pseudoprogression is gaining in importance.
-
Although cutaneous melanoma accounts for only about 4% of all skin cancers (including nonmelanocytic skin cancer), it is responsible for 80% of all deaths caused by skin cancer. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors led to a significant improvement in long-term survival of patients in an advanced stage regardless of BRAF mutation status. In addition to targeted therapy for patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma, immunotherapies are the therapies of choice in advanced stages and, since 2018, also in the adjuvant setting. The effectiveness of combination therapies and sequences of targeted and immunotherapies are currently being tested.
-
Tumor cells always exhibit differences to normal cells. These differences can be recognized by the immune system, enabling the destruction of tumor cells by T cells, as was impressively demonstrated by the success of immune checkpoint inhibition, e.g., in malignant melanoma. ⋯ Nevertheless, all of the efforts made in this respect during the past 30 years have been virtually futile. With current knowledge and technology there is new hope.
-
Checkpoint blockade contributes to the immunosuppressive microenvironment in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) and in particular the interaction of Hodgkin cells and macrophages with T‑cells and natural killer cells via programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1). ⋯ In 60-70% of patients with chemotherapy-refractory cHL, PD‑1 blockade results in responses. Overall survival is excellent and a small number of patients achieve persistent response. Thus, the use of anti-PD‑1 monoclonal antibodies has become an important treatment approach in relapsed cHL in line with the label. The results of first-line therapy are still preliminary; initial phase II studies using nivolumab in combination with doxorubicin (=adriamycin), vinblastin and dacarbazin (AVD) in early unfavorable or advanced stages showed response rates of up to 90%. Thus, implementing immunomodulatory approaches using PD 1‑blockade have resulted in a significant reduction of chemotherapy. This might represent a paradigm shift in the therapy of cHL.
-
The induction of protective T cell responses requires two signals: Signal 1 is generated by activation of the T cell receptor (TCR) and signal 2 results from ligation of the CD28 molecule. Costimulation of the TCR and CD28 is necessary, as the TCR is very good at discriminating between endogenous and foreign structures (antigens), but not all foreign antigens (such as food antigens) are dangerous to the body. A strong CD28 signal, thus, indicates to the T cell that there is indeed a threat and that an immune response is urgently required. However, to avoid autoimmunity and excessive immune responses, further regulatory circuits, provided by immune checkpoints, are necessary. ⋯ Due to the clinical success of checkpoint inhibitors, the concept of cancer immunotherapy has received a massive boost and hopes are high that many more clinical advancements in cancer therapy can be achieved with novel forms of immunotherapy.