The American journal of medicine
-
Meta Analysis
A Closer Look at Penicillin Allergy History: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Tolerance to Drug Challenge.
True allergy to penicillin is rare, despite the high frequency with which it is reported. While most patients reporting penicillin allergy are not prone to anaphylaxis, it is not currently known what percentage of these patients will tolerate dose challenges of penicillin-based antibiotics. This review aims to determine the rate of tolerance in patients reporting penicillin allergy when challenged with penicillin-based antibiotics. ⋯ Misrepresented penicillin allergy drives unnecessary use of alternative antibiotics, which may be less effective, more toxic, and more expensive than using penicillin. In addressing the problem of penicillin allergy over-diagnosis, evaluation should go beyond risk for type 1 hypersensitivity. Our data suggest that 94.4% of 5056 participants with reported penicillin allergy determined to be clinically appropriate for allergy evaluation tolerated repeat administration of penicillin-based antibiotics without any adverse reactions. This review generates meaningful information useful to clinical predictive analytics, in evaluating and managing patients with a reported history of penicillin allergy.
-
Health care providers are frequently faced with the challenge of caring for patients who have limited English proficiency. These patients experience challenges accessing health care and are at higher risk of receiving suboptimal health care than native English speakers. ⋯ Many providers lack the skill set and knowledge that are vital to successful collaboration with an interpreter. The objective of this article is to address a number of questions surrounding the use of health care interpreters and to provide concrete suggestions that will enable providers to best serve their patients.
-
Skin cancer affects 1 in 5 Americans, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Treatment costs and rates of skin cancer and melanoma continue to rise, making preventative measures increasingly important. However, there is conflicting evidence about efficacy of primary and secondary prevention strategies in decreasing incidence and improving early diagnosis. ⋯ Additional emerging evidence shows that regular skin cancer screening in high-risk populations improves early detection and decreases melanoma mortality. New technology may enhance prevention, promote accurate diagnoses, and improve management of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers. Here, we place rising rates of melanoma within historical context, review costs, efficacy, and evidence for primary and secondary skin cancer prevention and examine the evolving role of novel technologies in the field.