Neurosurgery
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
Single Versus Fractionated Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas Close to the Optic Pathway: A Multicenter Propensity Score Matched Study.
Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS), typically administered in a single session (S-GKRS), is an effective treatment for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA). For lesions close to the optic pathway, the use of hypofractionated radiosurgery is growing. This study seeks to compare the results of S-GKRS vs fractionated-GKRS (F-GKRS) for NFPAs adjacent to the optic pathway. ⋯ In the management of NFPAs adjacent to the optic pathway both F-GKRS and S-GKRS had comparable outcomes and risks at 7 years. Future prospective studies including larger cohorts with longer follow-up are needed to confirm our results.
-
Persistent neuropathic pain after brachial plexus avulsion (BPA) is common and generally nonresponsive to medical management. Dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning is the last resort for pain management in patients with BPA. This study aims to investigate and compare the outcomes and complications of DREZ procedures. ⋯ DREZ lesioning is effective for intractable pain alleviation after BPA. Compared with RF-assisted DREZ lesioning, MDT is associated with better VAS score improvements and a lower rate of postoperative motor weakness.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
General Versus Nongeneral Anesthesia for Carotid Endarterectomy: A Prospective Multicenter Registry-Based Study on 25 000 Patients.
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a well-established treatment option for carotid stenosis. The choice between general anesthesia (GA) and nongeneral anesthesia (non-GA) during CEA remains a subject of debate, with concerns regarding perioperative complications, particularly myocardial infarctions. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes associated with GA vs non-GA CEA using a large, nationwide database. ⋯ In this nationwide registry-based study, non-GA CEA was associated with better short-term outcomes in terms of perioperative complications, compared with GA CEA. The findings suggest that non-GA CEA may be a safer alternative, especially in younger patients and those with more comorbidities.