Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE
-
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol · Feb 2014
Observational StudyMyocardial injury secondary to ICD shocks: insights from patients with lead fracture.
Patients who receive appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks have a subsequent adverse prognosis. Most data suggest that patients with inappropriate ICD shocks also have a subsequent adverse prognosis, although this is more controversial. The shocks may be an epiphenomenon, that is, a marker of underlying disease progression; however, it cannot be excluded that shocks cause direct myocardial damage. This latter question is difficult to clarify as the arrhythmia provoking the shock can also cause troponin release. Inappropriate shocks secondary to lead fracture are an ideal situation to examine this question; any troponin release in an otherwise well and hemodynamically stable patient, is likely due directly to the shocks. ⋯ Troponin elevation occurred in the majority of our patients after inappropriate ICD discharges secondary to lead fracture. This indicates that ICD shocks can cause myocardial injury.
-
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol · Jan 2014
Comparative StudyCardiac perforation and lead dislodgement after implantation of a MR-conditional pacing lead: a single-center experience.
The purpose of our study was to determine if the rate of lead-related complications was increased with the Medtronic CapSureFix MRI™ SureScan™ 5086 MRI pacing lead (5086; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) compared to the previous generation of Medtronic CapSureFix Novus™ 5076 pacing lead (5076). ⋯ In a high-volume center, the incidence of pericarditis, cardiac perforation, tamponade, death, and lead dislodgement was significantly higher with the MR-conditional Medtronic 5086 lead when compared to the previous generation Medtronic 5076 lead.
-
Drug-induced Brugada syndrome (BrS) represents a great challenge for the prescribing clinicians as well as for those involved in the development of novel pharmaceuticals and in the regulatory bodies responsible with monitoring drug safety. Apart from well-known cardiac agents (mainly Class I antiarrhythmics), an increasing number of noncardiac agents, including psychotropic and anesthetic drugs, have been shown to induce the characteristic Brugada electrocardiogram pattern predisposing to fatal ventricular arrhythmias. Up to now, both repolarization and depolarization abnormalities are thought to be related to the development of ventricular fibrillation in BrS patients. This review highlights the mechanisms and the noncardiac medical agents that unmask a genetic predisposition to BrS.
-
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol · Dec 2013
Safe single-dose administration of propofol in patients with established Brugada syndrome: a retrospective database analysis.
Propofol is an anesthetic drug with a very attractive pharmacokinetic profile, which makes it the induction agent of choice, especially in day-case surgery. Data on its potential proarrhythmic effects in patients with Brugada syndrome (BS) patients are still lacking. The aim of our study was to investigate whether a single dose of propofol triggered any adverse events in consecutive high-risk patients with BS. ⋯ From 1996 to 2011, 57 high-risk patients with BS (35 males; mean age: 43 ± 16 years) underwent an automated implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation at our center using propofol as induction drug of general anesthesia. Three patients had a history of spontaneous type I ECG, three had aborted sudden death, and 51 had a history of recurrent or unexplained syncope. The induction dose ranged between 0.8 mg/kg and 5.0 mg/kg (2.2 ± 0.7 mg/kg). Only one case received propofol to maintain anesthesia. The surgical procedure involved an anesthetic period of 75 ± 25 minutes. No patient developed a malignant rhythm during induction and maintenance of anesthesia. All patients were then safely discharged from the postanesthetic care unit after 1 hour. No adverse events were noticed during the recovery phase. In our study, administration of a single-dose propofol in patients with BS was safe. Nevertheless, extreme caution is still recommended when conducting general anesthesia in patients with BS, especially if BS patients are sedated with propofol for longer periods.
-
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol · Nov 2013
The importance of atrial fibrillation burden and the origin of device-tailored anticoagulation.
The current paradigm for anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation is based upon clinical risk factors for stroke without reference to the frequency or duration (i.e., burden) of atrial fibrillation episodes. In the last decade, increasing evidence derived from device-based surveillance of atrial fibrillation has suggested that in some patients the burden of atrial fibrillation may be associated with thromboembolic risk. The development of rapidly acting oral anticoagulants and devices with remote monitoring capability has allowed the testing of a strategy of tailored or "pill-in-the-pocket" anticoagulation based upon atrial fibrillation burden.